This paper examines attachment disorders as they manifest in children who have experienced institutional care, including those adopted from abroad or placed in foster care. Drawing on key empirical studies, it discusses the behavioral patterns associated with attachment disorders—such as indiscriminate friendliness and inhibited conduct toward strangers—and traces these patterns into adolescence and adulthood. The paper addresses the paradox of a condition recognized as clinically severe yet lacking clear diagnostic consensus. It critically evaluates the most widely used intervention, holding therapy, highlighting its lack of empirical support and documented dangers, and surveys the limited landscape of other treatment and family support options.
The paper demonstrates effective use of secondary sourcing and evidence synthesis. Rather than relying on a single study, the author compiles findings from multiple researchers—Chisholm, Carter, and O'Connor and Zeanah—to build a converging argument about etiology and treatment gaps. The explicit acknowledgment that "relatively few empirical reports" exist shows critical awareness of a field's evidentiary limitations, a hallmark of mature academic writing.
The paper opens by defining the disorder and identifying its core clinical problem. It then reviews behavioral evidence across development, from early childhood through adulthood. A central paragraph frames the clinical paradox, followed by a critical section on holding therapy. The paper closes by surveying parent-support approaches and honestly admitting the field's unresolved questions. References follow in a brief citations section.
Attachment disorder refers to the clinical condition evidenced by and experienced by children who have endured adverse early care — typically children in the foster care system or those adopted after experiencing institutional deprivation abroad. A significant problem in this field is that there are a great many theoretical and interpretive papers on the topic but relatively few empirical reports, causing considerable confusion among professionals and caregivers who are uncertain about which approach to take in treating and caring for affected children.
Regardless of the type of institutional care these children received, studies consistently show that children who experienced institutional care exhibit a similar pattern of disturbed and alienated behavior toward strangers (Chisholm, 1998). It appears that the absence of a consistent caregiver, combined with a lack of selective attention, drives the characteristics and etiology of attachment disorders. A similar phenomenon has been observed in animals (Carter, 1998). Although attachment disorder was originally thought to be similar to, or associated with, the behavioral and emotional problems commonly seen in young children, recent research shows it to be largely non-associated with those conditions (O'Connor & Zeanah, 2003). Furthermore, the few reports that conducted long-term follow-up found that attachment disorder did not diminish with time.
O'Connor and Zeanah (2003) report two studies in which children adopted from Romanian institutions still exhibited the same inhibited conduct toward strangers even in middle childhood. Another study by Tirzad and colleagues (as cited in O'Connor & Zeanah, 2003) noted that while these children's inhibited or "over-friendly" behavior toward strangers may have diminished somewhat over time, much of their conduct remained pronounced in adolescence and adulthood, where "disturbances in their social behavior and relationships were evident" (p. 225).
This same inhibited conduct is also displayed toward foster or adoptive parents, despite the fact that these children may have been living with those families for many years. Research on attachment theory underscores how early deprivation can fundamentally shape a child's capacity for selective social bonding, with consequences that extend well beyond the early developmental years.
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.