Research Paper Undergraduate 719 words

Authentic Assessment in Head Start Preschool Classrooms

~4 min read 5 sections Education · Early Childhood Education

Abstract

This paper reviews a study by Hallam et al. (2007) examining how authentic assessment practices linked to the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework affect preschool classroom quality. The study observed twenty-six Head Start classrooms divided into intervention, pilot, and comparison groups. The intervention, known as Project LINK, integrated portfolio development, curriculum-based assessment, and instructional planning aligned with the Child Outcomes Framework. Classroom quality was measured using the ECERS-R and ELLCO instruments. Results showed no statistically significant differences on the ECERS-R, but significant improvements in literacy and language environment quality were found for the pilot and intervention groups on the ELLCO. The paper concludes by noting the researchers' call for larger, more diverse future studies.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Assessment Standards in Head Start: Policy context and critique of Head Start performance standards
The Project LINK Intervention: Description of Project LINK's curriculum-assessment integration approach
Study Design and Measures: Observation procedures, instruments, and data analysis methods
Results and Findings: ECERS-R and ELLCO outcomes across three classroom groups
Conclusions and Recommendations: Researcher conclusions and calls for broader future studies

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

The paper presents a clearly organized summary of a primary research study, moving logically from context and rationale to methodology, results, and conclusions.
It accurately distinguishes between the three groups in the study (intervention, pilot, and comparison), which is essential for understanding the nuanced findings.
The paper correctly separates null findings (ECERS-R) from significant findings (ELLCO), demonstrating careful reading and accurate reporting of quantitative results.

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper demonstrates concise research synthesis: the writer condenses a multi-method empirical study into a focused summary without distorting the original findings. The consistent use of parenthetical attribution (Hallam et al., 2007) throughout shows disciplined source acknowledgment and keeps the reader aware that claims derive from a single primary source.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with the policy context for Head Start assessment, introduces the study and its rationale, explains the Project LINK intervention in detail, describes the measures and data collection procedures, presents the statistical results, and closes with the researchers' conclusions and suggestions for future research. This mirrors the IMRaD structure common in educational research summaries, making it easy to follow.

📘 Read the full research paper guide → Generate citations → Build an outline → Draft a literature review → 📚 More Early Childhood Education examples →

Essay 719 words

Introduction: Assessment Standards in Head Start

Head Start preschool classrooms prominently emphasize performance standards as a way to assess educational programs for young children. However, this approach is often criticized as inappropriate for the assessment of young children (Hallam et al., 2007). Standards outlined in the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework were developed as an assessment system in response to the need for increased accountability in early childhood care and education. The Child Outcomes Framework was developed in 2000 as an outline of outcomes expected for four-year-old children as they leave the Head Start program. The concern about this type of framework is that it potentially results in a disconnect between appropriate assessment processes and outcomes.

Hallam et al. (2007) investigated the classroom quality associated with an intervention that linked authentic assessment practices with the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework. These researchers conducted their study by observing twenty-six preschool classrooms involved in Head Start. The pilot and intervention classrooms used an approach to assessment that blended the development of portfolios in line with the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework and a curriculum-based assessment tool, and then integrated this child assessment information into instructional planning. The control group contained comparison classrooms that used only the standard Head Start program assessment approach, which included an agency-developed lesson plan and a standardized assessment tool.

The Project LINK Intervention

The intervention approach used in the study was Project LINK, a program that aimed to promote connections between curriculum, assessment, and outcomes for the enhancement of school success for children involved in the Head Start program (Hallam et al., 2007). The program was intended to serve as a means of documenting accountability, and was designed as an intervention and evaluation to be used over two years. The first year consisted of an examination of classroom quality, and the second year consisted of an examination of standardized child outcomes and classroom quality.

Project LINK is part of a broader movement in early childhood education toward assessment practices that are more authentic and context-sensitive than standardized testing alone. By integrating portfolio development with curriculum-based assessment tools, the intervention sought to align documentation of children's progress with both instructional planning and the accountability requirements of the Head Start framework.

3 Sections Hidden · 325 words

Study Design and Measures120 words

Measures used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention approach in comparison to the control classrooms included the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition (ECERS-R) and the Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation Toolkit (ELLCO). The ECERS-R is a widely used instrument for evaluating the overall…

Results and Findings95 words

Results of the study indicated no statistically significant differences between the three experimental groups with regard to the ECERS-R. Statistically significant differences were found in the quality of the literacy…

Conclusions and Recommendations110 words

The researchers suggested that the findings indicate how an authentic assessment approach has the potential to positively impact the literacy and language environment of the classroom (Hallam et al., 2007). Specifically, an intervention focused on child assessment and standards in a…

View Full Document

Reference

Hallam, R., Graham-Brown, J., Gao, X., & Brookshire, R. (2007). The effects of outcomes-driven authentic assessment on classroom quality. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 9(2). Retrieved 20 February 2012 from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v9n2/hallam.html.

Already a member? Log in

Unlock the rest of this paper

135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection

7-Day Pass

$9.99One-time payment

Does not renew

Get 7-Day Pass

Monthly

$12.99Per month

Renews at $12.99/month until canceled

Start Monthly

Best value

Annual

$99Per year

Renews at $99/year until canceled

Start Annual

Unlimited AI writing tools
Plagiarism and AI text detection tool

Secure checkout

Plan details

Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.

TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.

Prices exclude applicable tax.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Head Start Authentic Assessment Project LINK Child Outcomes Framework Portfolio Development Classroom Quality Literacy Environment ELLCO ECERS-R Instructional Planning