Buddhism and Enlightenment in Why Did Bodhidharma Leave?
This paper analyzes the 1989 Korean film Why Did Bodhidharma Leave for the East? as a meditation on Zen Buddhist enlightenment. Through close reading of the film's three central characters — Master Hyegok, Ki Bong, and the orphan Hae Jin — the paper examines the tension between the inner spiritual world and the external world of attachment. Drawing on the traditional Zen "Ten Bulls" framework, the paper maps each character's spiritual progress and considers how earthly bonds, sacrifice, and the weight of karma prevent or delay the attainment of full enlightenment. The paper concludes by reflecting on whether any character truly reaches the final stage of the Ten Bulls.
- Introduction: Film overview and central analytical framework
- The Monastery and the Inner-Outer Framework: Monastery as space of inner and outer tension
- Characters and Their Earthly Attachments: Ki Bong and Hae Jin's bonds to the outside world
- Master Hyegok and the Role of the Zen Teacher: Master's devotion, approaching death, and legacy
- The Ten Bulls and the Path to Enlightenment: Ten Bulls framework mapped onto each character
- Conclusion: Assessment of whether enlightenment is achieved
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear internal vs. external framework to organize its analysis, giving each character's spiritual struggle a consistent interpretive lens throughout.
- It connects a specific cultural artifact (the Ten Bulls Zen tradition) directly to character development in the film, demonstrating interdisciplinary close reading.
- The paper avoids oversimplifying Buddhist concepts — for example, noting that the tenth bull is not enlightenment itself but a return to society, which adds nuance to the final assessment of each character.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates thematic analysis applied to film: it identifies a governing framework (inner world vs. outer world) and systematically applies it to each major character, using a canonical Zen text (the Ten Bulls) as a secondary theoretical lens. This shows how literary and religious studies tools can be combined in film analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing thesis about the film's internal-external dynamic, then introduces the narrative and setting. It proceeds character by character, analyzing each figure's attachments and spiritual position. It then introduces the Ten Bulls framework and maps each character onto it before closing with a measured, qualified conclusion about whether enlightenment is actually achieved.
Introduction
The film Why Did Bodhidharma Leave for the East? is a profoundly artistic depiction of both inner spiritual belief and individual approaches toward enlightenment, as well as the external relationships that form between people. From this perspective, the film sustains an internal vs. external framework throughout, emphasizing different perspectives to underscore essential characteristics of its three main characters.
The narrative is relatively straightforward: in a Buddhist monastery, three characters of different ages study Buddhist teachings in order to reach enlightenment. Master Hyegok, the old teacher; Ki Bong, his disciple; and the orphan Hae Jin come together in this remote, isolated place to learn about achieving enlightenment. The relationships that form among these characters, as well as the inner struggles each faces in trying to reconcile their past and move beyond ordinary perception toward a deeper, enlightened life, are the film's central concern.
The Monastery and the Inner-Outer Framework
The film revolves around the figure of Master Hyegok, the Zen Buddhist master and teacher, who has come to believe that enlightenment can only be achieved through a total abandonment of the outside world and a complete focus on one's inner life. While the monastery exists within the real world, it is no longer an ordinary worldly space. As a place where enlightenment is the sole purpose of its inhabitants, a deliberate withdrawal from the surrounding world is visible in the actions and approaches of all three characters.
However, the clash between the monastic world — and, simultaneously, the inner world developing within each character — and the outside world is evident not only in the necessity of withdrawal, but also in the conflicts each inner world experiences with elements of the external world. It is precisely these conflicts that prevent the two younger disciples from being able to leave the outside world completely behind.
Characters and Their Earthly Attachments
Each character remains attached to elements of the outside world, and this is strongly connected to the central idea of the film: that enlightenment cannot come easily, but requires genuine sacrifice from those who seek it. Ki Bong has abandoned his family and his blind mother in order to pursue enlightenment. While this might appear to be a selfish act — and it can, in many respects, be interpreted that way — Ki Bong suffers deeply for having left his loved ones and remains reluctant to fully commit to this path.
Hae Jin, on the other hand, has accidentally killed a bird. Though this may seem like a minor incident, within Buddhist cosmology, the constant process of reincarnation means that killing a bird may be tantamount to killing a human soul reborn in that form. It is small, concrete events like this that keep the characters' human consciousness alert and prevent them from taking the final step toward enlightenment — a complete departure from the ordinary world.
Conclusion
The film ultimately presents enlightenment as an aspiration that none of the three characters fully achieves, though each progresses meaningfully along the path. Master Hyegok leaves behind teachings that may guide his pupils forward. Ki Bong and Hae Jin, still tethered by earthly attachments, nevertheless continue to grow through the stages outlined by the Ten Bulls tradition. Their persistent connections to the real world are not simply obstacles — they are also evidence of their humanity, and perhaps the very thing that will make their eventual return to society, as fully enlightened beings, meaningful.
References
Reps, Paul, and Nyogen Senzaki. Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings. 1957.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.