Exploring Buddhism Through an Interfaith Interview
This paper presents a reflective interview with a Buddhist coworker, examining his beliefs, practices, and personal relationship with Buddhist tradition. The paper explores core Buddhist concepts including the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the doctrine of no-self, and the goal of reaching Nirvana. It considers the role of community, ritual, ethics, emotional experience, and material expression in the interviewee's practice. The paper also compares Buddhism with Christianity, discusses the origin of religion through the lens of the inherent need theory, and addresses the challenges Buddhism faces in the contemporary West, particularly regarding social justice. The author concludes with personal reflections on the differences and surprising similarities between the two traditions.
- Introduction to Buddhism and the Interview: Buddhism's background and interview partner selection
- Core Beliefs and Personal Practice: Partner's pragmatic Buddhist beliefs and meditation practice
- Myth, Ethics, and Emotional Experience: Buddha's story, Four Noble Truths, and emotional states
- Material Expression and Sacred Life: Physical objects, rituals, and sense of the sacred
- Buddhism in the Modern World and Social Justice: Challenges Buddhism faces and social justice limits
- Comparing Buddhism and Christianity: Similarities and differences between the two traditions
- Conclusion and Personal Reflection: Author's personal reaction and unanswered questions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds abstract religious concepts — such as no-self, Nirvana, and the Four Noble Truths — in a concrete, personal interview, making them accessible and relatable.
- The author maintains a respectful, curious tone throughout, even when drawing clear distinctions between Buddhism and their own Christian faith, which strengthens the comparative analysis.
- The conclusion goes beyond simple summary by raising genuine philosophical questions (the First Mover principle, the reality of the world), demonstrating critical engagement with the material.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the interview as primary evidence while supporting observations with scholarly citations (Giles, Loy, Mason). This combination of primary data collection and secondary source integration is a hallmark of qualitative, reflective academic writing in religious studies.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing Buddhism and the interview context, then moves through Ninian Smart's classic dimensions of religion — belief, myth, ethics, ritual, experience, material culture, and community — applied to the interviewee's practice. It closes with a comparative section contrasting Buddhism and Christianity, followed by a personal, philosophical conclusion. The structure is systematic without being mechanical.
Introduction to Buddhism and the Interview
Buddhism is a way of life that spread from the East into the West and gained popularity in the United States in the latter half of the 20th century. Some argue that it is not actually a religion since it does not admit the existence of any God. However, its focus on meditation and the goal of reaching a state of no-self has led many to see it as an important part of their life, if not a full religious experience or way of living (Giles, 1993). I chose my conversation partner from work because I knew he held beliefs different from my own.
Core Beliefs and Personal Practice
My conversation partner's beliefs were not characterized by explicit faith in the story of the Buddha, but rather by a pragmatic appreciation of what Buddhism offers in a materialistic society where consumerism dominates and the rat race can make people chase after empty dreams that only cause more pain and suffering. As a Buddhist, he uses meditation as a way to transcend the pressures of daily life and maintain a peace and purity of mind and spirit. He does not believe in life after death, but believes that by following Buddhism he can reduce the amount of pain he experiences or causes, and increase the amount of love he has to give.
His belief system holds that when a person is self-centered, he is falling for the illusion of the universe; when he embraces no-self, he rises out of that illusion. His goal as a Buddhist is to break free from the ego, which traps a person within the illusion. He aspires to reach Nirvana — freedom from the illusion in which there is no more suffering (Loy, 1982).
In terms of community, my conversation partner did not give a strong sense of having one as a Buddhist. For him, his beliefs were something he practiced individually. He did not attend any temple or church. He learned meditation from watching videos on YouTube and from reading books.
Myth, Ethics, and Emotional Experience
The central myth of Buddhism is the story of the Buddha, which focuses on his renunciation of worldly things — the very attachments that prevented him from breaking free from suffering. Once he transcended his attachments and his own sense of self, he reached Nirvana — total Enlightenment. Although my conversation partner did not believe in this myth as literal truth, he appreciated its narrative value and the rites that are part of the ritual of meditation as promoted within Buddhism.
In terms of ethics, the pillars of Buddhism serve as the ethical foundation. These are the Four Noble Truths, which include the Eightfold Path that leads one away from suffering (Mason, 2016). The truths are: suffering exists; suffering is caused by craving; suffering can be ceased; and the Eightfold Path is what ceases it.
The emotional experiences my conversation partner described were positive: a feeling of rebirth, of bliss, and of inner peace — these were the primary emotions he experienced. He felt calm and serene. He noted, however, that he was still making progress and had not yet achieved total Nirvana.
Conclusion and Personal Reflection
My personal reaction to this experience is that it was interesting to learn about Buddhism and to see a person believe in it to the point where he was willing to make it a part of his everyday life. My conversation partner meditated daily and truly believed that this world was an illusion. However, I could not help but feel that he was pursuing Buddhism out of some bitterness or spirit of dejection. I myself could not believe that this world and this life are illusory. I feel, within myself, that this world is real and that this life is real and true.
I would like to ask my conversation partner why he believes the world is an illusion. If the world is an illusion, what is the point or purpose of this life? How did the illusion come to exist? Where did we all come from? One of the reasons I believe what I do is because of the First Mover principle, and I would be interested in exploring this matter further with my partner.
References
Giles, J. (1993). The no-self theory: Hume, Buddhism, and personal identity. Philosophy East and West, 43(2), 175–200.
Loy, D. (1982). Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the same? International Philosophical Quarterly, 22(1), 65–74.
Mason, W. (2016). Buddhist concepts: The four noble truths. Retrieved from http://www.waltermason.com/2010/06/buddhist-concepts-four-noble-truths.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.