Reducing Operating Costs in a Burn Care Unit: Strategic Analysis
This report analyzes strategic alternatives for reducing operating costs at a 40-bed Burn Care Unit whose Baylor Plan overtime policy has generated approximately $800,000 in annual nursing payroll expenses. The paper estimates baseline labor costs across regular, flex-pool, and agency staff categories, then evaluates three strategies: discontinuing the Baylor Plan, outsourcing non-core activities, and upgrading health information systems with electronic health records (EHRs). After weighing financial projections and organizational impact, the report recommends an information systems improvement initiative requiring a $700,000 investment that is projected to yield one-time savings of $375,800 and recurring annual savings of $541,662, reaching $2,000,787 over three years—without provoking nursing strikes or staff conflict.
- Introduction and Executive Summary: Overview of Baylor Plan costs and recommended alternatives
- Problem Analysis and Baseline Labor Cost Estimation: Baseline labor cost tables and overtime assumptions
- Alternative Strategies for Reducing Labor Expenses: Three strategies evaluated: Baylor, IT upgrade, outsourcing
- Estimating Potential Cost Savings from Each Strategy: Quantified cost savings for each strategic alternative
- Chosen Strategy and Implementation Plan: EHR upgrade selected with 13-week rollout plan
- References: Citations for HIS, outsourcing, and Baylor Plan sources
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every recommendation in quantitative analysis: baseline labor cost tables, overtime calculations, single-year and three-year cost-benefit analyses, and NPV projections give the argument measurable weight.
- Systematically rules out alternatives before committing to a recommendation, demonstrating a structured decision process that anticipates objections (nursing strikes, vendor reliability) rather than simply advocating for one option.
- Integrates a detailed, week-by-week implementation plan that moves the paper beyond theoretical analysis into operational guidance, making the recommendation actionable for healthcare administrators.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs cost-benefit analysis as its central method, constructing both single-year and multi-year financial models for each alternative. This allows the writer to compare strategies on a common financial basis and translate abstract policy choices (continue or abandon the Baylor Plan, adopt outsourcing) into concrete dollar figures, which is essential practice in healthcare management and public affairs writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an executive summary that previews all three alternatives and the recommended solution. It then works through a problem analysis section that establishes the baseline annual labor cost (~$5.1 million) before evaluating each strategy in turn: discontinuing the Baylor Plan, improving information systems, and outsourcing. A dedicated cost-savings estimation section quantifies each option. The paper closes with a chosen strategy, a 13-week implementation timeline, a reference list, and a detailed cost-savings appendix for the EHR option.
Introduction and Executive Summary
The Burn Care Unit is a healthcare organization operating a 40-bed inpatient facility. Since its formation, the unit has been profitable and has seen increasing revenues; however, the organization has faced persistent challenges in recruiting professional nurses. To address chronic staffing shortages, management adopted the Baylor Plan—an overtime policy under which nurses who work 24 hours on the weekend are paid for 36 hours, and nurses who work 60 hours on weekdays are paid the equivalent of 70 hours. Although the plan has helped stabilize staffing, it has driven annual nursing payroll costs to approximately $800,000 above a straight-time baseline. The unit's accountant has suggested that the CEO discontinue the Baylor Plan to reduce operating costs.
While eliminating the Baylor Plan would produce measurable savings, doing so would very likely provoke nursing strikes and cause valued staff to resign—outcomes that carry their own costs and risks. Because that option is not organizationally viable, this report evaluates two additional alternatives: (1) improving the unit's health information systems (HIS) through the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and related technologies, and (2) outsourcing non-core activities to third-party vendors.
The objective of this report is to identify a strategy—or combination of strategies—that will reduce Burn Care Unit's operating expenses by $500,000 without provoking a nursing strike. Key findings are summarized below:
Outsourcing non-core activities (housekeeping, food services, facility management, Bio-Med, and selected IT services) to vendors such as Aramark, Sodexo, and Datamark could generate cost savings of approximately $2.99 million per year. However, this option carries meaningful risks: affected non-clinical staff may resist or strike, and poorly structured vendor contracts can result in service failures.
Improving the information systems requires a total investment of $700,000 ($200,000 for direct-care enhancements and $500,000 for broader IT efficiency improvements). In return, Burn Care Unit is projected to realize one-time savings of $375,800, recurring annual savings of $541,662, and cumulative IT and business savings of $2,000,787 over three years. This strategy avoids any disruption to nursing staff and is therefore the recommended course of action.
The report further recommends that Burn Care Unit selectively outsource portions of its IT services to supplement the information systems strategy—provided that only reputable, experienced vendors are engaged. A 13-week implementation plan for the information systems upgrade is presented in Section 4.
Problem Analysis and Baseline Labor Cost Estimation
A multi-unit healthcare corporation in Georgia has been nationally recognized for its Burn Care Program. The program was established in 1978 with an initial capacity of 20 beds and subsequently expanded to a 40-bed unit, making it highly financially rewarding. Over the past three decades, however, the unit has experienced persistent nursing shortages and staffing problems. In response, management implemented the Baylor Plan: nurses work 12-hour shifts every weekend and, if applicable, on weekdays. Nurses who work 24 hours on the weekend are paid for 36 hours with full benefits. Those assigned to weekday shifts for five consecutive days are given the following nine days off. Since the plan's introduction, operating costs have risen substantially, with nursing payrolls totaling approximately $800,000 above straight-time costs. Management has therefore decided to reduce operating expenses without compromising the quality of patient care.
Estimating Annual Labor Operating Costs
The report estimates annual labor costs by calculating the hours worked by three groups of nurses—regular employees, flex-pool employees, and agency employees—across multiple staff categories. The following assumptions apply:
- The Head Nurse (HN) worked 168 hours per pay period (1 × 12 × 14).
- Unit Supervisors (USs) worked 672 hours per pay period (4 × 12 × 14).
- Remaining hours were distributed by nursing category: 76.0% to Registered Nurses (RNs), 16.0% to Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and 8.0% to Nursing Assistants (NAs).
- The same percentage distributions were applied to agency and flex-pool hours.
- Full-time equivalent (FTE) employees work 40 hours per week or 80 hours per pay period. FTE data were drawn from the "Census and Acuity Data by Pay-Period" table (Shukla, 2000, p. 2).
Baseline Cost Estimate — Hourly Rates for Regular Staff
The assumed hourly rates for regular hospital staff, by shift and role, are as follows:
6 am–2 pm / 2 pm–6 pm / 6 am–10 pm / 10 pm–6 am
HN: $17.50 / $17.50 / — / —
RN: $14.50 / $16.00 / $16.00 / $17.50
LPN: $9.80 / $10.80 / $10.80 / $11.80
NA: $6.50 / $7.50 / $7.50 / $8.50
US: $7.50 / $8.50 / $8.50 / $9.50
The average hourly rate for the 6 am–6 pm group is calculated as 8 hours at the first rate plus 4 hours at the second rate, divided by 12. The average for the 6 pm–6 am group is calculated as 4 hours at the first rate plus 8 hours at the second rate, divided by 12 (Shukla, 2000, p. 2). The daily staffing pattern, expressed in hours by shift, is shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Daily Staffing Pattern (hours by shift)
6 am–6 pm: HNs = 12 | RNs = 48 | LPNs = 48 | NAs = 24 | USs = —
6 pm–6 am: HNs = 0 | RNs = 48 | LPNs = 0 | NAs = 24 | USs = —
Daily Total: HNs = 12 | RNs = 96 | LPNs = 48 | NAs = 48 | USs = —
Percent 6 am–6 pm: RNs = 50% | LPNs = 50% | NAs = 50%
Percent 6 pm–6 am: HNs = 0% | RNs = 50% | LPNs = 50% | NAs = 0% | USs = 50%
Overtime costs are calculated at 0.30 times the regular hourly rate. The fully loaded hourly rates—comprising regular pay, hourly fringe costs, and average hourly overtime costs—for each employee category are summarized in the tables below.
Fully Loaded Hourly Rates — Regular Employees (Baseline, No Baylor Plan)
HNs: Hours = 4,368 | Avg Regular Pay = $17.50 | Fringe = $5.25 | OT = — | Fully Loaded = $22.75
RNs: Hours = 140,217 | Avg Regular Pay = $16.00 | Fringe = $4.80 | OT = — | Fully Loaded = $20.80
LPNs: Hours = 29,619.4 | Avg Regular Pay = $10.80 | Fringe = $3.24 | OT = — | Fully Loaded = $14.04
NAs: Hours = 14,759.7 | Avg Regular Pay = $6.83 | Fringe = $2.05 | OT = — | Fully Loaded = $8.88
USs: Hours = 17,472 | Avg Regular Pay = $8.50 | Fringe = $2.55 | OT = — | Fully Loaded = $11.05
Flex Pool Employees (Baseline)
RNs: Hours = 11,831.7 | Avg Regular Pay = $17.50 | Fringe = $5.25 | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $22.75
LPNs: Hours = 2,490.9 | Avg Regular Pay = $12.30 | Fringe = $3.69 | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $15.99
NAs: Hours = 1,254.4 | Avg Regular Pay = $7.83 | Fringe = $2.35 | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $10.18
Agency Employees (Baseline)
RNs: Hours = 9,196 | Avg Regular Pay = $23.67 | Fringe = n/a | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $23.67
LPNs: Hours = 1,936 | Avg Regular Pay = $17.00 | Fringe = n/a | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $17.00
NAs: Hours = 968 | Avg Regular Pay = $12.33 | Fringe = n/a | OT = n/a | Fully Loaded = $12.33
Under the Baylor Plan, nurses working two 6 am–6 pm shifts (weekend and weekday) actually work 84 hours (7 × 12) but receive pay for 106 hours (36 + 70). This represents an extra bonus of 26.19% (106/84 − 1) above their regular base pay. The fully loaded hourly rates with the Baylor Plan overtime premium applied are shown below:
Fully Loaded Hourly Rates — Regular Employees (Baylor Plan in Effect)
HNs: Hours = 4,368 | Avg Regular Pay = $17.50 | Fringe = $5.25 | OT = $4.58 | Fully Loaded = $27.33
RNs: Hours = 140,217 | Avg Regular Pay = $16.00 | Fringe = $4.80 | OT = $4.19 | Fully Loaded = $24.99
LPNs: Hours = 29,619.4 | Avg Regular Pay = $10.80 | Fringe = $3.24 | OT = $2.83 | Fully Loaded = $16.87
NAs: Hours = 14,759.7 | Avg Regular Pay = $6.83 | Fringe = $2.05 | OT = $1.79 | Fully Loaded = $10.67
USs: Hours = 17,472 | Avg Regular Pay = $8.50 | Fringe = $2.55 | OT = $2.23 | Fully Loaded = $13.28
Annual Baseline Costs — All Employee Categories
Regular Employees:
HNs: 4,368 hours | Regular = $76,440 | Fringe = $22,932 | OT = $20,020 | Total = $119,392
RNs: 140,217 hours | Regular = $2,243,471 | Fringe = $673,041 | OT = $587,576 | Total = $3,504,088
LPNs: 29,519.4 hours | Regular = $318,809 | Fringe = $95,643 | OT = $83,498 | Total = $497,950
NAs: 14,759.7 hours | Regular = $100,858 | Fringe = $30,257 | OT = $26,415 | Total = $157,530
USs: 17,472 hours | Regular = $148,512 | Fringe = $44,554 | OT = $38,896 | Total = $231,962
Regular Subtotal: 206,336.1 hours | $2,888,090 | $866,427 | $756,405 | $4,510,922
Flex Pool Employees:
RNs: 11,831.7 hours | $207,054 | $62,116 | — | $269,170
LPNs: 2,490.9 hours | $30,638 | $9,191 | — | $39,829
NAs: 1,245.4 hours | $9,756 | $2,927 | — | $12,683
Flex Subtotal: 15,568 hours | $247,448 | $74,234 | $0 | $321,682
Agency Employees:
RNs: 9,196 hours | $217,639 | — | — | $217,639
LPNs: 1,936 hours | $32,912 | — | — | $32,912
NAs: 968 hours | $11,939 | — | — | $11,939
Agency Subtotal: 12,100 hours | $262,490 | $0 | $0 | $262,490
Total Annual Cost: 234,004.1 hours | $3,398,028 | $940,661 | $756,405 | $5,095,094
Alternative Strategies for Reducing Labor Expenses
This section evaluates three alternative strategies for reducing labor costs by $500,000: (1) discontinuing the Baylor Plan, (2) improving health information and technical support systems, and (3) outsourcing non-core activities.
Discontinuing the Baylor Plan
The accountant, Mr. Adam, suggests that the CEO discontinue the Baylor Plan to reduce the Burn Care Unit's operating expenses. While this option would reduce costs, its critical drawback is that it would provoke nursing strikes and likely cause significant staff turnover. As noted by the Head Nurse of the Burn Care Unit (Shukla, 2000, p. 2), nurse morale dropped sharply as soon as word spread that management was considering discontinuing the plan. Many nurses considered resigning, and some moved toward organized strike action. Because this option risks destabilizing the nursing workforce, it is not a viable alternative and is not recommended.
Improving Technical Support Systems (TSS)
Technical support systems encompass communication systems, information systems, and distribution systems. Health information systems (HIS) draw on a wide array of data sources including electronic medical records (EMRs), computerized physician medication order entry, and clinical decision support systems. According to Hillestad, James, Katya, et al. (2005), the primary benefit of HIS is its capacity to dramatically reduce operating costs while simultaneously improving patient care and safety. The authors estimate that if most hospitals and clinics in the United States adopted HIS, potential savings for both outpatient and inpatient care would exceed $77 billion annually. The largest savings would come from reductions in hospital length of stay and nursing administrative time, leading to better scheduling and improved patient safety.
When integrated into HIS, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) eliminate paper-based medical records and yield savings through reduced transcription services, fewer paper-chart retrievals, and lower administrative staffing requirements. EHR systems also allow nursing professionals to create medication-ordering templates and enter clinical notes more efficiently, further reducing time spent on administrative tasks. Hillestad, Bigelow, and Bower (2005) corroborate these projections, estimating efficiency savings of up to $77 billion from reductions in nursing administrative time and hospital lengths of stay across the U.S. healthcare system.
Outsourcing Non-Core Activities
Outsourcing involves transferring selected organizational activities to third-party providers so that the organization can focus resources on its core mission. In the United States, outsourcing has become a major strategy that healthcare organizations use to lower costs while maintaining high-quality patient services. Outsourcing can reduce both fixed and variable costs for Burn Care Unit.
Companies such as Aramark and Sodexo provide outsourced services that include housekeeping, food preparation, environmental services (cleaning all patient, staff, and visitor areas), laundry, facility management, and Bio-Med support (Roberts, Henderson, Olive, et al., 2013). On the IT side, Datamark offers mail services, scanning and imaging, document processing, and storage and retrieval services, allowing organizations to leverage volume-based pricing. Outsourcing IT functions can also give Burn Care Unit access to top-tier IT expertise while reducing capital investment in infrastructure.
Despite these benefits, the outsourcing strategy carries significant risks. As Hsiao, Pai, and Chiu (2009) note, outsourcing can fail if not managed effectively. Poorly drafted contracts are a particularly common source of failure. Additionally, affected non-clinical staff may resist or strike in response to outsourcing announcements, creating a parallel risk to the one associated with discontinuing the Baylor Plan. For these reasons, while outsourcing merits consideration for selected IT services, it is not recommended as the primary cost-reduction strategy.
Appendix 1: Detailed Cost Savings from Information Systems Improvements
Direct Cost Savings — Software Clients
Application A: 0% one-time | 20% annual | $200,000 avoided
Application B: 0% one-time | 40% annual | $240,000 avoided
Imaging Tools: 1% one-time | 10% annual | $25,000 avoided
Encryption Tools: 0% one-time | 20% annual | $90,000 avoided
OS Virtualization: 0% one-time | 20% annual | $60,000 avoided
Security Utilities: 1% one-time | 20% annual | $300,000 avoided
Software Client Total: One-Time = $300,000 | Annual = $205,000 | 3-Year = $915,000
Software — Servers
Business Applications: 6 servers | Annual = $52,200
Back-Up/Recovery: 6 servers | $30 per unit
OS Virtualization: 4 servers | $30 per unit
Security Utilities: 4 servers | $30 per unit
Other: 2 servers | $75 per unit
Server Software Total: One-Time = $39,800 | Annual = $57,710
Hardware
Server Consolidation: 4 units | $34,800
Virtualization: 2 units | $17,400
Peripherals/Replacement/Other: $0
Hardware Total: One-Time = $36,000 | Annual = $52,200
IT Services
Consulting Services: 80 hours | Annual = $36,000
Outsourcing: 80 hours | Annual = $36,000
IT Services Total: One-Time = $0 | Annual = $24,000 | 3-Year = $72,000
Power/Electricity Usage
PC savings: Annual = $160,965 | 3-Year = —
Server savings: Annual = $63,072 | 3-Year = —
Power/Electricity Total: Annual = $224,037 | 3-Year = $672,111
Other IT Costs
Reduce Bandwidth Costs: $10 per unit | $0 one-time
Reduce Heating/Cooling Costs: $2 per unit | $0 one-time
Reduce Other Facilities Costs: $10 per unit | $0 one-time
Other IT Costs Total: One-Time = $0 | Annual = $11,700
Business Savings — Travel Expenses
Employees impacted: 5 (average trips reduced)
Trips avoided: 67
Travel Savings: Annual = $73,355 | 3-Year = $220,066
Business Services and Other Business Expenses
All line items (consulting, outsourcing, supply costs, raw materials, inventory carrying costs, operations): $0 across all columns.
Grand Total — All Savings
Organization Total:
Software – Clients: One-Time = $300,000 | Annual = $205,000 | 3-Year = $915,000 | Per PC = $60
Software – Servers: One-Time = $39,800 | Annual = $57,710 | Per PC = $8
Hardware: One-Time = $36,000 | Annual = $52,200 | Per PC = $7
IT Services: One-Time = $0 | Annual = $24,000 | 3-Year = $72,000 | Per PC = $0
Power/Electricity: Annual = $224,037 | 3-Year = $672,111 | Per PC = $0
Other IT Costs: Annual = $11,700 | Per PC = $0
IT Subtotal: One-Time = $375,800 | Annual = $468,307 | 3-Year = $1,780,721 | Per PC = $75
Travel Expenses: Annual = $73,355 | 3-Year = $220,066 | Per PC = $0
Business Services: $0
Other Business Expenses: $0
Grand Total: One-Time = $375,800 | Annual = $541,662 | 3-Year = $2,000,787 | Per PC = $108 annual / $400 three-year
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.