This memo-style paper examines the ethical dilemmas facing Electrocorp as it considers relocating production operations to Mexico, the Philippines, or South Africa to reduce costs. The paper identifies employees as the most adversely affected stakeholders and evaluates alternatives through the lens of utilitarian ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR). It analyzes issues including child labor, environmental degradation, and employee loyalty, ultimately recommending the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) program as the most ethical course of action. The paper proposes a five-month wage extension to support displaced workers while the company fulfills its relocation objectives.
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Project Management Office
RE: Response to the Ethical Dilemma Created by the Relocation Program
DATE: February 22, 2014
This memo is written to inform the Board of Directors that the company is faced with an ethical dilemma. The ethical dilemma presented in this report is based on the challenge of balancing corporate loyalty and corporate responsibility. This report advises the Project Management Office (PMO) on the possibility of applying the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act as part of a broader corporate responsibility plan. The report identifies employees as the most adversely affected stakeholders by the relocation program. To achieve ethical corporate responsibility, the report proposes a bailout program extended to five months from the date of declaration.
Rising production costs in the US have forced Electrocorp to explore the option of relocating its production plants to Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa. These three nations offer diverse conditions that may allow the company's relocation prospects to thrive. Should the company opt to relocate to Mexico, it would benefit from low labor costs of $3 per day and comparatively lenient environmental laws. The Philippines, on the other hand, may be favorable because of wages as low as $1 per day and the availability of workers as young as sixteen years of age. Serious concerns about health challenges arising from industrial operations are pronounced in both Mexico and the Philippines. The third option — relocating to South Africa — presents its own challenges. Strong workers' unions exist in that country, and the wage rate is $10 per day. Labor unrest stemming from environmental concerns related to the company's operations is also considered likely.
Following the industrial expansion of the 1970s, consistent corporate responsibility became a necessary standard. Ethical responsibilities include the primary moral principles that a business upholds in its day-to-day activities — among them honesty, integrity, truthfulness, and transparency. Ethical corporate responsibility extends throughout the business and into its external environment. In business, ambition, competition, prosperity, and innovation are vital considerations; however, their application must be regulated and contained appropriately to prevent insensitive business practices.
Regulations entail the proper application of restraint in minimizing problems associated with unchecked corporate behavior. Any business must look beyond maximizing profits. To this effect, corporate responsibility should focus on the collective formulation of policies oriented toward the general good of society. Ethical responsibility integrates stakeholders — investors, executives, employees, and the community — into a collective business vision, one that respects environmental laws and basic morality.
Corporate executives are obliged to address social, political, and economic dimensions in justifying and interpreting corporate decisions (Horrigan, 2010). Even with its expansion prospects and the intent to maximize profits, it is appropriate for Electrocorp to respect the law. The law exists to ensure that friendly and fair business practices are observed. This company should not seek to exploit legal loopholes to exercise corporate brutality. Instead, the law should be applied to reaffirm the necessity of truthfulness and justice. For instance, a business entity should not exploit legal loopholes to reduce its tax obligations below the threshold it is required to meet. In any case, paying taxes should be an inherent corporate activity. Therefore, in analyzing the facts surrounding Electrocorp's relocation, it is important to note that corporate social responsibility (CSR) should be voluntary and not merely mandatory compliance.
Electrocorp is looking into the possibility of three distinctive offshore investments in Mexico, the Philippines, and South Africa. Several fundamental considerations must be taken into account. First, each of these nations has distinct laws relating to labor and fiscal policy; it is therefore necessary to abide by local laws while enabling each location to pursue a customized corporate responsibility program. Second, Electrocorp intends to relocate its plants entirely to the three countries and establish them in industrial parks. This means a significant number of current employees will be declared redundant and subsequently unemployed. The central ethical question is: what measures is this company planning to take in response?
Loyalty considerations often undermine the collective spirit of corporate responsibility. The question Electrocorp must confront is whether short-term financial gain will triumph over sound ethical reasoning. Ethical dilemmas affecting Electrocorp include short-term goals versus long-term consequences, justice versus truth, and the company's interests versus those of society. The law, in most cases, applies justice rather than truth, and Electrocorp should be mindful of this distinction in its overseas investments. Drawing on consequentialist theory, utilitarianism should be paramount in every venture — maximizing social good while minimizing harm. This report proposes the extension of seventy percent of repayable wages until the termination of affected employees' contracts.
More specifically, the company faces the issue of either continuing its operations in the US at high cost or moving to developing countries. Relocation to Mexico and the Philippines appears to offer solutions to the company's financial difficulties. However, it faces the ethical dilemma of polluting the environment through its operations and, in the case of the Philippines, potentially relying on child labor. The issue of morality is critical at this point. South Africa appears to be the most expensive of the three locations, but workers there are more aware of their rights, and the risk of labor unrest is real. The company also faces the issue of abandoning loyal, long-tenured employees in favor of cheaper labor at new locations. Whether disregarding the loyalty of these employees is worth the financial gamble is a question the company must answer ethically.
Alternative 1 — South Africa versus Mexico/Philippines: Although South Africa appears to be more expensive, the company should consider relocating there. By doing so, the company would avoid the ethical dilemmas of using child labor or significantly degrading the environment. Relocating operations to South Africa would require the company to follow established laws relating to workers' treatment in the workplace, and the company's commitment to environmental stewardship would also be better supported.
Alternative 2 — Moving to South Africa versus staying in the US: The company is facing serious financial challenges and is attempting to reduce operational costs. The viable option in this case is for the company to identify ways of compensating affected employees and then proceeding with the relocation of its plants to South Africa. The WARN program is a viable mechanism for achieving this.
Based on the cost of doing business and competitive pressures, it is appropriate for the company to develop viable alternatives. These alternatives must account for the needs of all stakeholders in a timely and responsible manner. The application of value theory in evaluating alternatives is essential for integrating ethical philosophies to determine the merits of each course of action (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2014). The core question is whether this company respects the economic wellbeing of all its stakeholders — including customers, employees, investors, and both local and foreign communities.
"Comparing South Africa, Mexico, Philippines, and WARN"
"Five-month wage extension and HR implementation steps"
Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2010). Managing business ethics. John Wiley & Sons.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.