Canadian Public Policy Cycle: Problem Definition and Analysis
This paper examines the early stages of the Canadian public policy cycle, focusing on how problems are identified and brought to the attention of policymakers. Drawing on Pal (2013) and Atkinson (1993), it discusses the roles of public opinion, research institutions, ministers, and social norms in problem recognition. The paper also addresses the importance of internal, vertical, and horizontal consistency in policy design, the influence of new institutionalism, and the analytical tools — including gender-based analysis, cultural relativism, and empirical methods — used to evaluate potential policy issues within Canada's rational policymaking framework.
- Introduction to the Public Policy Cycle: Defines public policy and its foundational concepts
- How Policy Problems Are Made Known: Avenues for bringing issues to government attention
- Consistency and Institutional Frameworks: Internal, vertical, and horizontal policy consistency
- The Role of Social Norms and New Institutionalism: Social norms and private-public sector linkages
- Analyzing Policy Problems: Analytical tools applied to recognized policy problems
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly grounds its argument in two well-chosen scholarly sources (Pal, 2013; Atkinson, 1993), demonstrating familiarity with foundational Canadian public policy literature.
- Progresses logically from problem identification through to analytical frameworks, mirroring the actual sequence of the policy cycle.
- Introduces precise policy concepts — internal, vertical, and horizontal consistency — and applies them meaningfully to the Canadian context rather than leaving them as abstract definitions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses conceptual scaffolding: it introduces a theoretical concept (e.g., new institutionalism or policy consistency) and then immediately grounds it in real-world Canadian policy dynamics. This moves the argument beyond definition and into application, which is a hallmark of strong undergraduate policy writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition of public policy and surveys the avenues through which problems reach government. It then examines the conditions under which policy proposals are evaluated against norms and institutional goals, introduces the principle of new institutionalism, and closes by cataloguing the analytical tools — gender-based analysis, empiricism, economic modeling, and normative analysis — applied once a problem is formally recognized. The progression follows the early stages of a standard policy cycle.
Introduction to the Public Policy Cycle
Public policy is defined as "a course of action or inaction chosen by public authorities to address a given problem" (Pal, 2013, p. 3). The first step in making a given problem known is through public opinion, public interest, and related considerations such as values and norms. However, as Pal (2013) points out, a more idealistic motivation for bringing policy issues to the attention of policymakers is public interest itself, particularly in terms of core needs like public safety.
How Policy Problems Are Made Known
There are multiple avenues by which an issue may be made known to the Canadian government. One is via the research route, including university and "think tank" methods of analyzing problems empirically and presenting reports to stakeholder organizations or policymakers. A second avenue comes from ministers themselves, through close attention paid to their constituents and the prevailing interests of the people. Legal restrictions may constrain the ways in which a potential problem is brought to the attention of government, and jurisdiction issues may similarly affect the influence of key stakeholders.
Consistency and Institutional Frameworks
There are various ways policy problems are made known, depending on how the proposed policy fits the prevailing goals and missions of institutions. Moreover, a proposed policy will be measured against current norms, values, and attitudes toward the issue. Whether the subject is same-sex marriage or drug policy, decisions must ultimately be made with regard to three interconnected components: defining the problem with specific implications for Canadians; identifying the goals of stakeholders, including Canadian voters; and selecting the instruments used to develop and implement policy (Pal, 2013).
Likewise, there must be vertical consistency in that all the programs and institutions invoked in the policy relate directly to the policy itself (Pal, 2013). Horizontal consistency is sometimes more difficult to achieve, as it entails connecting the values of one policy with those of another. As Atkinson (1993) points out, new institutionalism reveals the structures and functions of social institutions within the policymaking process.
References
Atkinson, M. M. (1993). Public policy and the new institutionalism. In Governing Canada: Institutions and public policy. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada Inc.
Pal, L. A. (2013). Beyond policy analysis. Nelson.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.