Cannibal Tours (1988): Europeans as the Real Strangers
This paper offers a close reading of Dennis O'Rourke's 1988 documentary Cannibal Tours, examining how the film inverts the expected gaze between Western tourists and the indigenous people of New Guinea. Drawing on the Albert Camus epigraph that opens the film, the paper argues that European tourists are the true curiosities — disconnected from themselves and seeking stimulation in the exotic. The analysis considers specific scenes of posing, photography, and exchange to show how natives knowingly perform for tourists while tourists remain largely unaware of their own motivations. The paper concludes that the natives demonstrate greater self-awareness and maturity than their European visitors.
- The Camus Epigraph and the Film's Central Inversion: Camus quote frames Europeans as the true strangers
- The Camera as a Tool of Othering: Europeans photograph natives as exotic curiosities
- Exchange, Performance, and Mutual Observation: Natives perform knowingly; both sides observe each other
- The European Existential Malaise: Tourism as escape from modern self-alienation
- Conclusion: Who Is the Real Stranger?: Natives show greater maturity than European tourists
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors its central argument in the film's own epigraph, using Camus's quote as a lens that organizes the entire analysis.
- It builds its case through specific scene descriptions — the posing with children, the native speaking to camera, the money exchange — rather than making unsupported generalizations.
- The ironic inversion (Europeans as the real curiosities) is introduced early and consistently reinforced throughout, giving the essay a clear and unified thesis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates close reading of a visual text. Rather than summarizing the documentary's plot, the writer isolates discrete moments — a woman posing with native children as though with a wild animal, a native's amused glance directly at the camera — and uses those moments as evidence for a larger cultural argument about self-alienation and the tourist gaze.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with the Camus epigraph and a thesis inversion, then develops its argument through scene-by-scene analysis in the middle paragraphs, and closes with a broader cultural claim about European existential anxiety versus indigenous equanimity. The structure is essayistic and cumulative rather than formally sectioned.
The Camus Epigraph and the Film's Central Inversion
The quote by Albert Camus says it all at the opening of Cannibal Tours (1988): "There is nothing so strange in a strange land, as the stranger who comes to visit it." The film suggests that the natives of New Guinea are not the ones we should be concerned with, but rather the Europeans who come to photograph them as though collecting snapshots of curiosities and eccentricities to add to their collection of oddities back home. The reality is that the Europeans are far more intriguing, because there is a profound disconnect between themselves and their sense of self. It is almost as if they are unaware of themselves in their hyper-awareness of the natives. The natives, on the other hand, simply accept the Europeans as odd but harmless, and so they act friendly toward them.
The Camera as a Tool of Othering
In one exchange, the Europeans are posing with native children, and one tourist climbs onto a log where a young woman is sitting. She poses as if she is posing with an exotic wild animal. Would she pose this way with children at home? Why is she so eager to have this moment captured on film? This scene cuts to another European woman motioning to her subjects, directing how she wants them to pose for the camera. The act of photography here functions as a form of othering — the tourists frame the native people as objects of spectacle rather than as fellow human beings.
Then we see a native glancing with slight amusement directly into the camera at the viewer. The subtitles translate his words: "When the tourists come to our village, we are friendly towards them. They like to see all the things in the village." There is a strong sense that the natives are simply humoring the tourists, and that the tourists feel entitled to take their pictures and look around. Yet both groups view the other as curiosities — the irony is unmistakable.
Exchange, Performance, and Mutual Observation
The natives pose, the Europeans give them money, and when asked what he does with it, one native explains that he buys things he likes. It is an easy way for them to earn income, and the Europeans are grateful for a few still shots of the "exotic" people. The natives dance and perform, and the Europeans capture the images for memory's sake — as one European later explains to camera when asked why he wants a photograph of himself on a stone beside a native. But what, exactly, is he preserving? What is he truly experiencing?
What the two groups are experiencing, and what they reveal in their interviews, shows very little depth of genuine human interaction. One must ask: why must Europeans travel thousands of miles to a remote corner of the world simply to feel happy and alive, and to feel glad about taking pictures of human beings? Surely there are people in Europe too. The tourist gaze, as theorists have noted, reveals as much about the observer as it does about the observed.
Conclusion: Who Is the Real Stranger?
The natives do not seem to mind the Europeans' presence. They accept them with apparent ease, which suggests that they are probably more mature and self-possessed than their visitors. One supposes that the experience makes the Europeans feel better about themselves. Meanwhile, the natives' willingness to engage — on their own quiet terms — reveals a social confidence and groundedness that the tourists, for all their cameras and money, conspicuously lack. As the film makes clear from its very first frame, the real stranger in a strange land is the one who cannot recognize himself.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.