This paper examines the causes of terrorism by analyzing three case studies — the Baader-Meinhof gang (ideological), the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (nationalist), and alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism (religious) — through the lens of the frustration-aggression hypothesis. Drawing on Margolin's argument that terrorist behavior responds to frustrated political, economic, and personal needs, the paper traces the historical circumstances that gave rise to each group, evaluates the applicability of the hypothesis across all three cases, and assesses its usefulness and limitations as a theoretical framework for understanding terrorism motivation.
The paper demonstrates the use of a single theoretical lens applied comparatively across multiple cases. By selecting the frustration-aggression hypothesis and systematically testing it against three historically distinct terrorist groups, the writer shows how a theoretical framework can structure an argument, generate consistency, and reveal both explanatory power and analytical limits — a core technique in political science and security studies essays.
The paper opens with an introduction that states the theoretical framework and previews the three case studies. A background section on terrorism precedes detailed case study descriptions. The analysis then examines the historical processes behind each group's formation before applying the frustration-aggression hypothesis to each. A dedicated section evaluates the hypothesis's overall usefulness, and a concise conclusion synthesizes the main findings. This six-part structure moves logically from description to application to evaluation.
The causes of terrorism have attracted enormous concern among policymakers and the public, given the increase in terror attacks across the globe in recent years. Modern society has been characterized by the growing emergence of terrorist groups and organizations in various parts of the world. These organizations have continued to use sophisticated methods to accomplish their goals, aided by rapid technological advancements. Some major examples of terrorist groups include the Baader-Meinhof gang, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and the alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism. Following an analysis of these groups, the theoretical framework adopted here is Margolin's argument that "much terrorist behavior is a response to the frustration of various political, economic, and personal needs or objectives" (Joseph Margolin, 1977, pp. 273–274).
This discussion involves analysis of three terrorist groups across three categories: ideological, nationalist, and religious terrorism. The Baader-Meinhof gang, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, and the alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism are used to illustrate ideological, nationalist, and religious terrorism respectively.
Terrorism has developed into one of the major threats to global security in recent years as it continues to evolve because of new motivations, adversaries, and rationales. Terrorist groups and acts are carried out for three major reasons: ideological, nationalist, and religious purposes. The hypothesis chosen for analyzing these groups is the frustration-aggression hypothesis, which implies that when frustrations are addressed, terrorist activities will cease.
Hoffman (1997) argues that terrorism is rapidly changing and has become more accessible to any individual or group with an objective, purpose, grievance, or any peculiar combination of these factors (p. 50). The increased accessibility of terrorism has contributed to its rise as a major global security threat. The changing nature of terrorism has also generated serious questions regarding much of the conventional wisdom and assumptions about terrorists and terrorism. Nonetheless, ideological factors, nationalist objectives, and religion play crucial roles in terrorism's motivations, adversaries, and rationales. These three categories can be understood through the case studies below.
The Baader-Meinhof gang in Germany represents ideological terrorism. The group was founded in 1970 and disbanded in 1998. Based in West Germany, it was formed to protest against allegedly fascist, middle-class, and bourgeois values in the region. As part of its initial orientation, the gang protested against the Vietnam War while expressing support for communist ideals and opposing the capitalist status quo. In its early stages, the gang outlined its goals in its first communiqué on June 5, 1970 and in subsequent communications that year. The main intention of the gang was to deepen the disagreement between the state and its opposition ("Who Were the Baader-Meinhof Gang?" 2007). Notable attacks attributed to the gang include the bombing of U.S. barracks in 1971, the bombing of police headquarters in Munich and Augsburg in 1972, a series of murders in 1977, and the killing of a Siemens executive in 1986.
The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, or Tamil Tigers, in Sri Lanka represents nationalist terrorism. The group was formed in 1976 and commenced violent actions against the country's government in 1983. It designated the northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka as "Tamil Eelam," claiming these territories as an independent homeland. Since its inception, the Tamil Tigers funded itself and purchased weapons in Europe through both legal and illegitimate means, including drug trafficking, fraudulent humanitarian appeals, and partnerships with Indian organized crime. The declared intention of the group is to establish an independent Tamil state in the northern and eastern parts of the country. To fulfill their objectives, the Tamil Tigers targeted political and military leaders as well as civilians, particularly those competing with their militant factions. The most notable attacks carried out by the group include the assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991 and the murder of Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa in 1993.
An example of religious terrorism is the alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism. According to the United States, Iran is regarded as the foremost state sponsor of terrorism in the world. Iran has consistently supported and sponsored terrorist groups for religious reasons, including Hezbollah in Lebanon. While state-sponsored terrorism emerged as a concept in the mid-1970s, it remains unclear precisely when Iran began sponsoring terror activities. The country sponsors terrorism in attempts to exercise indirect political influence in other regions. The religious dimension of the alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism is evident in the link between the Iranian government and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The main objective of this body is to promote the goals of the Islamic revolution through partnerships with other Islamic groups. It is reported that Iran has sponsored the IRGC in training groups such as Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad. In some cases, the IRGC and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard have cooperated in operations against Israel. Furthermore, Iran has in recent years been linked to initiatives involving weapons of mass destruction.
The Baader-Meinhof gang in Germany represents ideological terrorism, which focuses on advancing a particular belief system through violence and terror against governments and civilians. Terrorist groups fueled by ideological objectives typically engage in violent activities in attempts to impose their political beliefs on others. Ideological terrorism emerged from revolutionary terrorism and anti-colonialism and is usually characterized by guerrilla warfare (White, 2012). The gang rose as one of the most prominent leftist organizations in Europe in the early 1970s and was named after its founders, Andreas Baader and Ulrike Meinhof. It is also known as the Red Army Faction, having been formed as a communalist urban guerrilla organization that fought against fascism and oppression.
The circumstances leading to the emergence of this terror group began with the 1967 demonstration against the state visit of the Iranian Shah. The Shah's visit attracted significant support from Iranians living in Germany and opposition from some German residents. German police killed a young man during the demonstration — an incident that acted as the catalyst for the formation of this leftist organization, which resolved to respond to the perceived fascism of the state. As an ideological group, the Red Army Faction sought to enforce its communist ideals while challenging what it saw as the actions of a fascist nation. The gang was thus a by-product of specific German political circumstances as well as the wider leftist trends that characterized Europe during this period.
In contrast, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam represents nationalist terrorism — violent acts fueled by nationalism. Nationalist terrorism groups emerge in pursuit of self-determination, which sometimes includes efforts to achieve independence or to form a self-governing and autonomous nation. These groups are driven by beliefs that they are being oppressed or denied rights by the government, and they seek to resist imperialism and illegitimate authority. Nationalist terrorist groups therefore tend to view themselves as freedom fighters for the minority or for a broader population with legitimate national rights.
The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka stand at the forefront of a contemporary nationalist movement that surfaced from state and ethnic discrimination. The group's nationalist goals are evident in its pursuit of an independent and sovereign state in the northern and eastern parts of the country. This faction is regarded as one of the most violent, disciplined, and well-organized terrorist groups in the world ("Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam," 2001). The primary motivation for the formation of this nationalist organization is the long-standing conflict between the Tamils and the Sinhalese, who dominate the Sri Lankan government. The LTTE rose to oppose ethnic and state discrimination after the Sinhalese established political and cultural authority by making Sinhalese the official language and Buddhism the official religion.
The alleged Iranian state-sponsored terrorism represents religious terrorism, which incorporates dimensions beyond those of purely ideological terrorism. Religious terrorist groups use religion as an ideology to justify violent actions and attacks against governments and populations perceived to hold a different religious orientation. Violent acts are condoned on the premise that they are carried out in accordance with the will of a higher power, making a person's faith the justification for violence.
The United States has consistently designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984, citing Iran's escalating terror-related activities ("State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview," 2013). In addition to sponsoring terror acts worldwide, Iran has provided logistical and material support for terrorist and military groups in parts of Asia. Iran became a religious terror sponsor in 1979 when it supported the overthrow of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and facilitated the establishment of the Islamic Republic. The country's religious motivations are fueled by aggression against Christians and adherents of other religions worldwide. According to O'Hern (2012), Iran endorses and sponsors groups such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps that promote global revolution and the liberation of Jerusalem from non-Muslims.
Terrorism is generally caused by various factors, including the frustration arising from a perceived inability to meet the common needs and expectations of individuals and groups. These acts take different forms depending on their foundations — ideological, religious, or nationalist — which shape how terror groups are formed and how they operate. The frustration-aggression hypothesis is a relevant and useful framework for understanding the causes of terrorism across all three case studies examined here. Grounded in relative deprivation theories, the hypothesis demonstrates the link between frustration and aggression, and implies that political violence and terrorism are consequences of political, social, and economic circumstances that leave fundamental human needs unmet.
Brynjar, L., & Katja, S. (2000). Why terrorism occurs: A survey of theories and hypotheses on the causes of terrorism. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from
"Chapter 3: State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview." (2013, May 30). Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism. Retrieved from U.S. Department of State website: http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209985.htm
Hoffman, B. (1997). Viewpoint: Terrorism and WMD: Some preliminary hypotheses. The Nonproliferation Review, 45–53. Retrieved from http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/hoffma43.pdf
Hudson, R. A. (1999, September). The sociology and psychology of terrorism: Who becomes a terrorist and why? Retrieved September 21, 2014, from
"Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam." (2001). South Asia Terrorism Portal. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from
O'Hern, S. K. (2012). Iran's Revolutionary Guard: The threat that grows while America sleeps. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books.
White, J. R. (2012). Terrorism and homeland security. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
"Who were the Baader-Meinhof gang?" (2007, February 12). One-Minute World News. BBC. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6314559.stm
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.