Cendant Accounting Fraud and the Principal-Agent Problem
This paper analyzes the Cendant accounting fraud scandal as a case study in the principal-agent problem. It begins by explaining the foundational role of accounting in capital allocation decisions made by shareholders, creditors, and stakeholders. The paper then examines how Cendant management deliberately misrepresented the company's financial performance through aggressive revenue recognition practices, fictitious bookkeeping entries, and manipulation of deferred revenue accounts. It argues that misaligned incentives between management and shareholders drove this misconduct, ultimately costing investors billions, undermining confidence in financial markets, and harming employees and other stakeholders.
- The Role of Accounting in Capital Allocation: Accounting enables informed capital distribution across industries
- The Principal-Agent Problem at Cendant: Misaligned incentives drove management to mislead shareholders
- Specific Accounting Fraud Techniques Used: Revenue manipulation and fictitious entries inflated earnings
- Management's Obligations to Shareholders and Stakeholders: Fraud cost shareholders billions and harmed all stakeholders
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Opens with a clear conceptual framework — the role of accounting in capital allocation — before narrowing to the specific case, giving the analysis proper context.
- Connects abstract theory (the principal-agent problem) to concrete examples of fraud (fictitious entries, deferred revenue manipulation), making the argument both rigorous and accessible.
- Maintains a consistent evaluative tone, explicitly judging management's conduct against a defined standard of obligation to shareholders.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of applying a theoretical framework to a real-world case. By introducing the principal-agent problem as the analytical lens and then systematically mapping Cendant's specific fraudulent practices onto it, the author shows how academic concepts explain actual corporate misconduct — a standard approach in business ethics and accounting case analyses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad argument about accounting's societal function, using industry comparisons (technology vs. airlines) to ground the stakes. It then introduces the Cendant case and identifies the principal-agent problem as the root cause. The third section catalogs specific fraud techniques with supporting detail. The final section evaluates the broader harm caused — to shareholders, financial system integrity, and employees — before concluding with a moral judgment on management conduct.
The Role of Accounting in Capital Allocation
Accounting is the language of business. It allows shareholders, creditors, stakeholders, and management to gauge the overall performance of a business enterprise. Through financial evaluation, potential investors and creditors can better assess the economic realities facing a company. This allows society to make better-informed decisions as they relate to capital distribution. Well-run companies that earn high returns on capital often attract a greater share of society's financial capital. Likewise, businesses or industries that do not earn a high enough return to compensate investors for the risks they are taking do not obtain large amounts of capital.
The technology industry, for example, earns high returns on capital and can therefore attract large inflows of investor capital. The airline industry, however, earns abysmal rates of return and consequently has a hard time raising capital. Accounting forms the basis of this decision-making on the part of shareholders, creditors, and stakeholders. Without truthful accounting that reflects economic reality, many errors can be made (Cellan-Jones, 2005).
The Principal-Agent Problem at Cendant
When reflecting on the Cendant case, management did not fairly or adequately represent the true economic performance of the business. Instead, they misled shareholders into believing the firm was doing better than it actually was. As the case illustrates, this stemmed from a misalignment between management and shareholder interests. Due to this principal-agent problem, Cendant's management did not perform admirably with respect to shareholders.
Specific Accounting Fraud Techniques Used
The first dimension of this principal-agent problem involves incentives. Management simply wanted to meet Wall Street expectations at the expense of shareholders. They were more concerned with satisfying those expectations and therefore engaged in very aggressive accounting practices. For example, Cendant used revenue recognition manipulation to inflate earnings. Examining company filings, it becomes apparent that Cendant failed to amortize solicitation costs from sales over the same period in which it reported revenue from memberships.
Management, in order to make the company appear to have steady and consistent earnings growth, would transfer money from the deferred revenue account and apply it directly to revenue. Cendant also committed egregious accounting fraud by making fictitious bookkeeping entries. These entries included understating membership cancellations and moving cancellation reserves directly into revenue. All of these techniques misled investors into believing the company was growing steadily and consistently. In reality, the economic performance of the company was deteriorating. Management did not uphold its obligations to shareholders, as it was not forthright about the true underlying performance of the business. Instead, the company attempted to perpetuate accounting chicanery to sustain a deception that would inevitably unravel.
References
Cellan-Jones, Rory (November 2, 2005). "The end of an epic." BBC News (BBC).
Emshwiller, John and Rebecca Smith. 24 Days: How Two Wall Street Journal Reporters Uncovered the Lies that Destroyed Faith in Corporate America. HarperInformation, 2003. ISBN 0-06-052073-6.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.