This paper critically examines the legacy of Christopher Columbus, challenging the popular narrative that portrays him as a heroic explorer who "discovered" America. Drawing on peer-reviewed scholarship and primary sources, the paper argues that Columbus's arrival in the Americas constituted an invasion rather than a discovery, initiating centuries of exploitation, forced labor, and devastating disease that decimated Native American populations. The paper traces how Columbus's reputation has shifted dramatically over time — from celebrated icon to symbol of colonialism and genocide — and concludes that the federal holiday bearing his name is unwarranted given the historical record.
The paper demonstrates effective use of historiographical analysis — it does not merely assert that Columbus was not a hero, but traces how Columbus's reputation was constructed, elevated, and then dismantled over centuries. By showing that historical reputation is shaped by ideology and selective evidence (e.g., contrasting Washington Irving's flattering biography with Charles Francis Adams Jr.'s archival rebuttals), the paper models critical thinking about how history is written and revised.
The paper opens with a brief introduction that frames the central question and signals a counter-narrative stance. A short biographical section establishes factual grounding. The argument then unfolds in two main analytical sections: the first addresses the "discovery" myth and the human cost of Columbus's arrival; the second traces the long arc of Columbus's reputation in American culture. A concise conclusion restates the thesis and adds a normative recommendation about Columbus Day.
The legacy of Christopher Columbus — in many people's minds — entails bravery, heroism, courage, and resolve. But does this man really deserve the reverent accolades he receives? Does he deserve to have a day named in his memory? Did he really "discover America," as the legend has it? All of these questions, and others, will be addressed in this paper.
We have a holiday to celebrate him. We were taught that he was a remarkable sailor and explorer who helped prove that the world was round. But for some people, Christopher Columbus was anything but a hero. This paper shows why doubters are justified in their skepticism.
Columbus was Italian, but he served Spain when he set sail for India in 1492. Columbus was born in Genoa, Italy, in 1451. His father was a master weaver who had a wine shop and who sailed from time to time to obtain supplies; Christopher accompanied him, becoming familiar with the sea and developing a love of adventure. When Columbus conceived the idea he called the "Enterprise to the Indies," he received funding from Spain. Columbus sailed around many islands in the Caribbean and landed on several of them, but he never fully understood that he had come upon a hitherto unknown — to most Europeans — continent.
An editorial in the peer-reviewed journal History takes a strong position regarding Columbus's alleged feats of glory. Written 500 years after Columbus sailed "the ocean blue," the editorial asserts what many people of good faith in the United States have maintained for hundreds of years: that the American continent was "peopled by millions — how many millions remains open to fierce controversy — of men, women, and children centuries before the Genoan captain rashly undertook to prove that the world was smaller in circumference than it really was" (Cornwell et al., 1992, p. 1).
The so-called "discovery" of the Americas by Columbus was, in reality, "an invasion" by Europeans, Cornwell continues. The results of that invasion were disastrous, with virtually no "beneficial consequences" for the aboriginal peoples. There is no way of knowing how many Native Americans "perished from the exchange of microbes" between the Europeans and the native peoples, but other authors have catalogued the diseases brought from Europe once Columbus opened the floodgates.
Meanwhile, after the Americas were "discovered" — or invaded — Native Americans were exploited by being put into forced labor, further "facilitating their annihilation," until they were pushed aside so that African slaves brought to the Americas could be put to work (Cornwell, p. 1). Given these grim realities, Cornwell writes that it is "easy to see how the commemoration of 1492 has become an embarrassment to many American historians," even as some of those historians hope that "Columbus Day" will pass by quietly without anyone remarking on the fraud that the holiday truly represents (Cornwell, p. 2).
Handlin, Lilian. "Discovering Columbus." The American Scholar 62.1 (1993): 81–96.
Thornton, Russell. American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since 1492. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1987.
Vizenor, Gerald. "Manifest Manners: The Long Gaze of Christopher Columbus." Boundary 2 19.3 (1992): 223–235.
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.