Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996: IT Management in Federal Agencies
This paper examines the Clinger-Cohen Act (CCA) of 1996, which replaced the Information Technology Management Reform Act and the Federal Acquisition Reform Act to establish a unified framework for federal information technology governance. The paper traces the legislative background that motivated the law, defines key terms such as information technology, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Chief Information Officer (CIO), and analyzes how the act set standards and regulations for federal computer systems. It further discusses OMB's management authority over IT investment, budgeting, and workforce training, and explains the procurement and contracting responsibilities granted to the OMB Director. The paper concludes that the CCA represented a significant shift from IT acquisition management to results-based information resources management.
- Introduction: Defines the act, IT, OMB, and CIO roles
- Background: Legislative history and need for the CCA
- Standards and Regulations: NIST standards and Federal CIO Council formation
- Management: OMB authority over federal IT investment and policy
- Procurement and Contracting: OMB Director's procurement powers and Congressional reporting
- Conclusion: CCA's shift to information resources management
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper follows a clear, logical structure that mirrors the act's own organizational logic — moving from definitions and background through standards, management, and procurement to a synthesizing conclusion.
- Key institutional actors (OMB, CIO, Congress) are introduced with precise definitions before their roles are analyzed, which helps a general reader follow policy-specific content.
- The paper consistently links each provision back to the act's overarching goal of results-based and performance-based management, giving the analysis a coherent throughline.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of statutory exposition — the technique of explaining the text and intent of a law by breaking it into its component provisions and tracing how each assigns responsibilities to specific actors. Rather than simply summarizing the act, the author maps authority relationships (Director of OMB → agency CIOs → agency heads) and shows how the law operationalizes those relationships through budgeting, standards-setting, and reporting requirements.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that defines the act and its three key terms (IT, OMB, CIO). The background section explains the legislative history and the deficiencies the act was designed to correct. The standards and regulations section details NIST's role and the formation of the Federal CIO Council. The management section enumerates OMB's operational authorities, and the procurement and contracting section focuses on budget oversight and Congressional reporting. The conclusion synthesizes the act's significance and the shift from IT acquisition to information resources management.
Introduction
The Information Technology Management Reform Act and the Federal Acquisition Reform Act were essentially replaced by the Clinger-Cohen Act (CCA) of 1996. In short, this act seeks to make use of information technology to encourage results-based and performance-based management. Greater focus is placed on IT investment management rather than IT acquisition management, while also seeking to better create and implement policies and strategies for the management of information resources and IT, as distinct from information management alone (Gillam, n.d.).
In this context, the act defines information technology as it was used in the 1998 amendments to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. That section defines the electronic and information technology which is developed, procured, maintained, or used by the federal government, and specifies that it must be accessible.
The act also identifies the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as an important component in the implementation of the act's policies (Gillam, n.d.). The OMB is part of the Executive Office of the President of the United States and is the largest office within it. The OMB reports directly to the President while helping executive departments and other agencies of the Federal Government implement policies, administrative commitments, and priorities.
The roles and importance of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) are also emphasized in the Clinger-Cohen Act. The CIO positions in government executive agencies are established by the act, and such executives report directly to the agency head with information resources management (IRM) as their primary duty (Agresti, 2006). The importance of the CIO is further underscored by the law, as the CIO is responsible for providing advice and assistance on matters related to IT and information resources management to the agency head (Gillam, n.d.).
Hence, according to the Clinger-Cohen Act, the OMB assumes great significance in the conduct of administrative policies and strategies of the U.S. government. The act also establishes the roles of federal agency CIOs as critical to the management of information resources — which forms the basis of the act's results-based and performance-based management philosophy.
References
Agresti, W. (2006). CIOs discuss the role of IT in organizational change. IT Professional, 8(3), 64–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2006.60
Bloem, J., Doorn, M., & Mittal, P. (2005). Making IT governance work in a Sarbanes-Oxley world. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gillam, M. Exploring the impact of the Clinger-Cohen Act on information technology governance: A phenomenological study.
Information technology. (2002). Washington, D.C.
McKinnon, B. (2001). Role of the chief information officer. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
Oversight of the implementation of the Clinger-Cohen Act.
Schick, A. (2001). The changing role of the central budget office. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(1), 9–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art3-en
Tollefson, J. (2011). U.S. federal agency loosens peer-review rules. Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.441
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.