Colonialism to Neocolonialism: Africa's Post-Colonial Reality
This paper traces the arc of exploitation in Africa from the slave trade through formal colonialism to contemporary neocolonialism. Drawing on the thought of Thomas Sankara and Kwame Nkrumah, it examines how former colonial powers and international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF have sustained economic dominance over African nations through debt cycles, unequal trade arrangements, and foreign aid dependency. Using Burkina Faso as a primary case study, the paper explores how "flag independence" has left many African states politically sovereign but economically subordinate. It concludes by arguing that Africa requires a second liberation — one grounded in institutional reform, local production, and self-sufficient economic policy.
- Background: From Colonialism to Neocolonialism: Defines colonialism, neocolonialism, and introduces Burkina Faso
- The Slave Trade, Colonial Exploitation, and Economic Underdevelopment: Traces exploitation from slave trade through colonial era
- Mechanisms of Neocolonialism in Post-Colonial Africa: Explains dependency theory, aid theory, and flag independence
- Debt, Aid, and the Perpetuation of Dependency: World Bank, IMF, and debt as neocolonial instruments
- Critics of the Neocolonialism Framework: Counterargument: corruption and poor leadership as root causes
- Is There a Need for a Second Liberation for the African Continent?: Calls for self-reliance, institutional reform, and second liberation
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates primary voices — Thomas Sankara's speeches and Kwame Nkrumah's writings — to ground abstract theoretical claims in lived political experience, giving the argument both emotional weight and historical credibility.
- Moves logically from historical context (slave trade → colonialism → neocolonialism) to contemporary mechanisms (debt, aid, unequal trade), creating a coherent chronological and analytical progression.
- Acknowledges and directly engages counterarguments (e.g., corruption and poor leadership as alternative explanations) before restating the core thesis, demonstrating intellectual fairness.
- Uses concrete country-level examples — Nigeria's crude oil paradox and Zimbabwe's unprocessed tobacco exports — to illustrate abstract economic concepts effectively.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of theoretical frameworks (dependency theory, foreign aid theory) to interpret empirical case studies. Rather than relying on a single explanatory lens, it layers multiple theories and tests each against real-world examples, producing a nuanced, multi-causal account of African underdevelopment.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with definitional groundwork for colonialism and neocolonialism, introduces Burkina Faso as a case study, then moves into a discussion section covering historical exploitation, mechanisms of neocolonialism, the role of international institutions, and notable critics. It closes with a prescriptive conclusion calling for a "second liberation" rooted in self-reliance and institutional strengthening. The structure follows a classic problem-analysis-solution arc.
Background: From Colonialism to Neocolonialism
During the colonial era, vast regions of Africa and Asia were taken over and subsequently dominated by the more powerful western nations. In essence, the main agenda of colonialism was exploitative — with economically stronger nations seeking to exert control over weaker and less developed countries in order to exploit both their human and natural resources. Colonial powers also deemed their colonies as viable markets for their products. The cultural and social aspects of the subjugated countries were affected and adapted in significant ways, with those countries being forced to embrace the cultural, religious, and social ideals of the colonial powers. Most dominated countries eventually regained their independence through concessions, compromise, or force, giving way to the post-colonial era. During the post-colonial period, former colonies attempted to reclaim their autonomy, with some seeking to build systems and structures of governance that were largely indigenous and reflective of their specific situations and needs. Neocolonialism took form during this post-colonial period.
Colonialism can be defined as "a structured relationship of domination and subordination… where the relationship is established and maintained to serve the interests of all or part of the dominant group" (Trifonas, 2003, p. 12). Colonialism therefore resulted from a foreign ruling state's total political dominance over the dominated country. The political power of society was monopolized by the ruling state, and legal structures were established to secure that political power. Colonial rule effectively made dominated countries fully dependent on a foreign power for sustenance (Trifonas, 2003). It is for this reason that gaining independence did not automatically set newly independent states on a path to self-determination and autonomy — especially from a political and economic perspective. With the end of colonial rule, most newly independent states still needed the support of stronger countries.
Neocolonialism, as Lagan (2017) points out, has been defined as "the continuation of external control over African territories by newer and more subtle methods than that exercised under formal Empire" (p. 4). Neocolonialism is therefore perceived when the economic as well as political influence over a given society persists beyond formal domination — despite there being no formal political control over the society in question. The emergence of neocolonialism in most societies could be seen as a consequence of the end of colonialism in the twentieth century. Lagan (2017) argues that former colonial masters and emerging economic powerhouses have systematically sought to reestablish control in some jurisdictions without necessarily assuming actual colonial rule. With their economic authority, such nations have largely succeeded in extending their influence over Third World nations.
Like many African nations, Burkina Faso was historically an agrarian state. It is, however, important to note that the country has accelerated its production of various minerals in recent years, including pumice, granite, dolomite, and marble. The country also holds sizeable gold reserves. Despite this abundance of natural resources, Burkina Faso remains largely underdeveloped, with a persistently high unemployment rate. The country's ties to France remain close. Could Burkina Faso, like many other African states that maintain close relations with former colonial powers, serve as a case study of modern-day neocolonialism? In reference to Burkina Faso's situation, Thomas Sankara, the country's president from 1983 to 1987, pointed out that "the greatest difficulty we have faced is the neocolonial way of thinking that exists in this country… we are colonized by a country, France…" (Harsch, 2014, p. 109). Thus, although Burkina Faso, like many other African countries, was regarded as an independent country, its former colonial power remained its modern-day colonial master.
References
Dwyer, M. (2018). Soldiers in Revolt: Army Mutinies in Africa. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harsch, E. (2014). Thomas Sankara: An African Revolutionary. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Lagan, M. (2017). Neo-Colonialism and the Poverty of 'Development' in Africa. New York, NY: Springer.
Martin, G. (2012). African Political Thought. New York, NY: Springer.
Mukhtar, H. Y., Kura, S. M., Abba, Y., & Ahmed, M. A. (2013). The slave trade, colonialism and Africa's underdevelopment. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 2(2), 220–228.
Thompson, E. T., & Garratt, G. T. (1999). History of British Rule in India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.). (2003). Pedagogies of Difference: Rethinking Education for Social Justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.