Resolving Curriculum Conflict and Teacher Tenure Review
This paper addresses two interconnected issues in educational administration. The first section analyzes a curriculum conflict between a traditional teacher resistant to change and a reform-minded colleague who believes students are underperforming relative to their potential, proposing a structured board review as the fairest resolution. The second section examines a sixth-grade teacher's tenure review, arguing that average or mediocre performance — even when technically positive — should not automatically qualify a teacher for continued tenure. Drawing on Boyer's (1990) four concepts of scholarship, the paper contends that truly effective teachers must stimulate, challenge, and inspire students, and that the American school system suffers when tenure processes fail to distinguish the exceptional from the merely adequate.
- Introduction to the Conflict: Old-school vs. reform-minded teacher dispute overview
- Resolving the Curriculum Conflict: Board review proposed as fair resolution path
- Mrs. New's Proposal for Curriculum Change: Six-point plan Mrs. New must document
- Tenure Review and Its Importance: Why tenure decisions require rigorous evaluation
- Evaluating the Sixth-Grade Teacher: Boyer's framework applied to mediocre performance
- Conclusion: Raising the Bar in Education: Call for higher standards in American schools
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly frames the central tension in each section — tradition versus innovation in the first case, and mediocrity versus excellence in the second — making the argument easy to follow.
- It uses Boyer's four concepts of scholarship as a structured analytical lens, grounding the tenure evaluation in recognized academic theory rather than subjective opinion.
- The proposed resolution in the curriculum conflict is practical and procedurally sound, specifying exactly what each party should prepare and who should make the final decision.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied use of theoretical frameworks: Boyer's taxonomy of scholarship is not merely cited but used as a direct evaluative checklist against the sixth-grade teacher's performance record. This technique — mapping real-world evidence onto an established framework — is a core skill in educational policy and administrative writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two distinct response sections. The first addresses interpersonal professional conflict resolution, offering a step-by-step procedural remedy and a clear outline of what documentation Mrs. New should prepare. The second shifts to institutional evaluation, critiquing the tenure review process as a system before applying Boyer's criteria to a specific case. Each section builds toward a broader claim: that higher standards across teaching, curriculum, and evaluation are essential to improving American education.
Introduction to the Conflict
The conflict between Mrs. Vei and Mrs. New is essentially a new versus old school issue. Mrs. Vei is a traditional teacher who wants to follow established structure, does not believe in innovation in educational instruction, and is guided by the principle that "if it isn't broken, it doesn't need to be fixed." Mrs. New, on the other hand, believes in just the opposite. She wants to change the curriculum to help children reach their full potential, arguing that students with such favorable demographics should be performing at the 90th percentile rather than the 76th.
Resolving the Curriculum Conflict
The best solution to this conflict would be to call a meeting with school superiors, present a plan for curriculum review, and explore how change might be introduced. Since Mrs. New has dealt with a much tougher school environment and was still able to achieve a 73rd percentile outcome, it demonstrates that she understands what she is talking about. She has experience helping students reach their full potential, and her plan for change is therefore worth serious consideration.
Because Mrs. Vei has more experience, however, she believes that her style of instruction does not need to be corrected. The best resolution would be to present both plans to the school board and allow them to make a final decision. Mrs. New should prepare a written plan describing why she wants to see a change, what changes she wants to introduce, and how those changes might affect instructional style and overall academic performance. Mrs. Vei should similarly prepare a written document explaining why she believes the current system should remain unchanged. In light of each teacher's experience with different student demographics and the results each has achieved, the school board would then be in the best position to decide what course of action is most appropriate.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.