This paper examines the role of DNA profiling in modern criminal justice, focusing on both its potential and its limitations. While DNA evidence has transformed the ability to identify suspects in certain crimes, many offenses — including car theft and some homicides — leave little or no biological evidence behind. The paper discusses the common motivations for car theft and why such cases rarely yield DNA evidence, then turns to homicide investigations, noting how the type and condition of a crime scene significantly affects what evidence is available. Fresh scenes, decomposed remains, and secondary crime scenes each present distinct investigative challenges.
DNA profiling is one of the newest methods being used to identify criminals, and it carries both positive and negative implications for the future of criminal justice and the solving of crimes that could not otherwise be resolved (Scheck, Neufeld, & Dwyer, 2000). In some cases, this is because there were no witnesses to a crime; in others, a variety of additional factors may prevent a straightforward investigation. It is also true, however, that many crimes do not leave behind any kind of DNA evidence, and therefore this new technology would not be useful in solving them (Scheck, Neufeld, & Dwyer, 2000).
Crimes that yield no DNA evidence must continue to rely on eyewitness identification and other factors in order to bring the alleged criminal to justice. This is very much the case with crimes such as car theft, and it is also sometimes true with homicide (Scheck, Neufeld, & Dwyer, 2000). Understanding where DNA profiling can and cannot contribute is essential to evaluating its true role in criminal justice.
There are many reasons why a person would steal a car. Usually, theft is motivated by money, or by the need to travel without access to a vehicle. Sometimes a car is taken simply for a "joy ride" — for the excitement of it. Most often, however, the goal is to deliver the car to a "chop shop," where the thief is paid once the parts are broken down and sold (Scheck, Neufeld, & Dwyer, 2000). Money is the motivator behind a large number of crimes, and most car thefts are no different. In many of these cases, there is no DNA or other physical evidence left behind, and the vehicle is simply gone, never to be recovered.
"How scene type affects available DNA evidence"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.