Essay Undergraduate 830 words

Du Bois vs. Washington: Analyzing "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington"

~5 min read 5 sections History · Atlanta Compromise

Abstract

This essay analyzes W.E.B. Du Bois's 1901 essay "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others" as a successful rhetorical argument against Booker T. Washington's 1895 Atlanta Compromise speech. The paper examines Du Bois's contrasting background and perspective, then evaluates the effectiveness of his argument through four lenses: its methodical structure, its commanding tone, its use of classical rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos), and the historical proof of its success. The essay concludes that Du Bois's critique effectively exposed the costs of Washington's compromise and made a compelling case for full racial equality.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Thesis: Du Bois's argument against Washington's compromise
Background: Washington and Du Bois: Contrasting origins shaping each man's racial views
Structure and Tone of Du Bois's Argument: Methodical structure and commanding tone analyzed
Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos: Classical appeals and proof of Du Bois's success
Conclusion: Summary of Du Bois's case for racial equality

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

The paper establishes a clear thesis early and returns to it consistently, making the argumentative thread easy to follow throughout.
The historical context section effectively contrasts Du Bois's and Washington's backgrounds to explain why the two men reached such different conclusions about racial equality.
The analysis of classical rhetorical appeals — ethos, pathos, and logos — provides a concrete framework for evaluating Du Bois's essay and gives the argument structure and discipline.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates rhetorical analysis, systematically breaking down Du Bois's argumentative strategies rather than simply summarizing his positions. By identifying specific appeals and connecting them to Du Bois's purpose and audience, the writer shows how persuasion works at a structural level — a transferable skill for analyzing any argumentative text.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens with a brief introduction establishing historical context and a clear thesis. A body section covers Washington's Atlanta Compromise and Du Bois's contrasting background. The analytical core then evaluates Du Bois's essay across four criteria: structure, tone, rhetorical support, and historical proof of success. A conclusion restates the thesis and summarizes findings. The organization is straightforward and reader-friendly, making it a solid model for short analytical essays.

📘 Read the full essay guide → Build your outline → Generate a thesis → Generate citations → 📚 More Atlanta Compromise examples →

Essay 830 words

Introduction

In 1895, Booker T. Washington delivered his Atlanta Compromise speech, trading political and voting rights for economic rights. Six years later, in 1901, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others," arguing against that compromise and for full racial equality. Du Bois's argument is successful because of its structure, tone, rhetorical support, and proven impact.

Background: Washington and Du Bois

Du Bois's essay directly engages with a speech Washington delivered and the broader compromises it represented. Born into slavery in the South and educated at Hampton Institute at a time when schooling was not a civil right for Black Americans, Washington addressed a mainly white audience during the post-Reconstruction hostilities between whites and blacks (A & E Television Networks, LLC). Washington argued that politics belonged to mainstream society and that African Americans should remain separate — like separate fingers on a hand — rather than integrate into white civic life. He urged Black Americans to accept an unequal place in society, offering to trade political and voting rights for economic opportunities, while privately funding civil rights litigation. Unfortunately, his speech was seized upon by white segregationists to bolster their own position (A & E Television Networks, LLC).

Du Bois's experiences were markedly different, which helps explain his contrasting view of Black-white relations. Du Bois was not born into slavery. He grew up in the North in a more diverse society, earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Fisk University, and received his Master's and Doctorate from Harvard University (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). Rather than looking backward toward the trauma of slavery and post-Reconstruction violence, he looked forward to full equality for Black Americans. As a member of the Niagara Movement, dedicated to racial equality, Du Bois wrote his 1901 criticism of Washington's compromise.

Structure and Tone of Du Bois's Argument

Du Bois's argument is successful in part because of its methodical and effective structure. He enumerates precisely what Washington surrendered in his compromise: the right to vote; civic equality; and the education of youth according to ability. He then identifies the costs of that compromise: the disenfranchisement of Black Americans; the legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority; and the steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of Black students (Du Bois). Du Bois devotes the bulk of his essay to explaining why those concessions were unjustifiable and documenting how severe their consequences were.

The tone of Du Bois's essay is equally effective. He writes as a well-educated man who demands respect and who entirely rejects the premise that Black Americans are inferior or deserve anything less than complete equality.

1 Section Hidden · 150 words

Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos150 words

To support his argument, Du Bois uses ethos, pathos, and logos. He uses ethos by appealing to the ethics of his audience…

View Full Document

Conclusion

In 1895, a former southern slave named Booker T. Washington gave a speech to a mainly white audience in which he argued that African Americans should separate themselves from white society, surrendering political and voting rights in exchange for economic opportunity. Six years later, W.E.B. Du Bois — a northern African American born free in a diverse society, who went on to earn advanced degrees from one of America's finest universities — argued against the Atlanta Compromise in "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others." Du Bois's argument is successful because of its structure, tone, rhetorical support, and historical proof of impact. Taken together, these qualities show how Washington arrived at his compromise, why that compromise was wrong, and why Black Americans should abandon it in pursuit of the equality they deserve.

Works Cited

A & E Television Networks, LLC. "Booker T. Washington." 1991. www.history.com. Web. 21 May 2016.

Du Bois, W.E.B. "Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others." 1 December 2014. grammar.about.com. Web. 21 May 2016.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. "NAACP History: W.E.B. Du Bois." 2016. www.naacp.org. Web. 21 May 2016.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Atlanta Compromise Racial Equality Rhetorical Analysis Ethos Pathos Logos Post-Reconstruction Niagara Movement Civil Rights Political Rights Disfranchisement Argumentative Structure