Managing Dysfunctional Conflict in Workplace Mergers
This paper examines the dysfunctional conflict that arises during a corporate merger, using the case of Nick Cunningham and Mansfield to illustrate how interpersonal and relational tensions can undermine organizational outcomes. Drawing on Bauer and Erdogan's conflict management framework, the paper distinguishes between functional and dysfunctional conflict, identifies the relational and professional sources of the dispute, and evaluates five conflict management styles — avoidance, accommodation, compromise, collaboration, and competition. The paper argues that accommodation followed by compromise and collaboration offers the most effective path forward. It also highlights the critical role of social and emotional intelligence in preventing and resolving workplace conflict.
- Functional vs. Dysfunctional Conflict: Distinguishing healthy conflict from harmful organizational dysfunction
- Sources of the Conflict: Relational and professional roots of the merger dispute
- Conflict Management Styles: Overview of five core conflict management approaches
- Recommended Approach for Nick Cunningham: Accommodation, compromise, and collaboration strategy for Nick
- The Role of Emotional Intelligence: Social and emotional intelligence as conflict prevention tools
- Conclusion and Key Takeaways: Synthesis of conflict resolution lessons for future leadership
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its analysis in a concrete case scenario, making abstract conflict management concepts tangible and applicable.
- It clearly distinguishes between functional and dysfunctional conflict at the outset, establishing a conceptual framework that guides the rest of the analysis.
- It evaluates all five conflict management styles before recommending a specific approach, demonstrating critical thinking rather than jumping to a conclusion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper consistently integrates external scholarly sources (Bauer & Erdogan, Luthans et al., Liddle) to support each analytical claim, rather than relying on personal opinion alone. This citation-anchored argumentation is a hallmark of undergraduate-level organizational behavior writing and shows how theoretical frameworks can be applied to real-world scenarios.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining functional versus dysfunctional conflict and situating the case within that framework. It then identifies the interpersonal and professional sources of the conflict, evaluates five management styles, and recommends a sequenced strategy (accommodation → compromise → collaboration). The final section broadens the discussion to emotional intelligence as a preventive tool. The conclusion synthesizes the argument. This problem-diagnosis-solution structure is well-suited to case study writing.
Functional vs. Dysfunctional Conflict
Conflict is a normal and healthy part of any relationship. It provides an opportunity for growth and resolution, and can even help to strengthen the bond between two people. However, not all conflict is created equal. Functional conflict is marked by healthy communication and mutual respect for each other's opinions. Both parties feel safe expressing their thoughts and views, and are willing to compromise in order to find a resolution. In contrast, dysfunctional conflict is characterized by a winner-takes-all mentality, stonewalling, and a general lack of respect, and it can harm an organization. As Bauer and Erdogan (2012) state, "Conflict can be dysfunctional if it paralyzes an organization, leads to less than optimal performance, or, in the worst case, leads to workplace violence." This kind of conflict often leads to arguments and resentment, and can damage the relationship beyond repair. It is important to be able to distinguish between these two types of conflict in order to maintain healthy relationships.
The kind of conflict that Nick Cunningham faces is definitely dysfunctional. It is an environment wherein there is a risk of total breakdown — Mansfield is threatening to retire after the way he has been treated by Synergon (Cliffe, 1999). However, this does not mean that the conflict cannot become functional. Nick does have the power to turn the dysfunctional conflict he is facing into a functional one — a conflict that can lead to good and positive outcomes. As Cliffe (1999) explains, "Nick needs to get Mansfield on his side. He needs to empathize with him and express personal regret about how the transition process has gone so far. In return, he needs a commitment from Mansfield that he will stay on and help Nick with the transition. If these two men can begin to understand each other, they may be able to salvage the acquisition."
Sources of the Conflict
The way to resolve the conflict offers a hint at its source: it is a conflict arising from interpersonal and relational issues. The managing director of Beauchamp feels slighted by the Synergon group, and believes that he and his people are being treated as less-than-equals. He does not like this treatment, and rightly feels that he deserves more respect. As Luthans et al. (2015) explain, organizational conflict can take many different shapes, but one must know how to manage stress in order to prevent conflict from escalating into dysfunction. What makes the problem particularly difficult for Nick is that the conflict begins in relational issues but then crosses into tasks and roles. It straddles both the personal and the professional spheres of the workplace environment, leaving Nick unsure of where to start in addressing the problem (Cliffe, 1999).
Bauer and Erdogan (2012) point out that "personal conflicts, such as personal attacks, are never healthy because they cause stress and distress, which undermines performance. The worst cases of personal conflicts can lead to workplace bullying." What Mansfield is experiencing is akin to professional bullying — a kind of micromanaging that is wholly displeasing to someone who has essentially steered his own company for so long. He wants to see his company merge successfully with Synergon, but he is not going to sit still and accept poor treatment while the merger takes place. Nick must be more considerate of Mansfield's personal and professional needs so as not to affront or displease him.
Conflict Management Styles
Conflict management is a critical skill for anyone in a leadership role. There are five basic styles of conflict management: avoidance, accommodation, compromise, collaboration, and competition (Bauer & Erdogan, 2012). Depending on the situation, one style may be more appropriate than another. Avoidance is often used when the stakes are low and there is little potential for resolution. With accommodation, the goal is to maintain relationships and avoid further escalation. Compromise may be used when both parties have something to lose and need to find a middle ground. Collaboration is used when there is a need to find a creative solution that meets the needs of both parties. Competition may be necessary when there is a zero-sum situation and one party must prevail at the expense of the other. Understanding these five styles of conflict management can help leaders make better decisions in times of dispute.
Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Research has shown that people with higher levels of social and emotional intelligence are better able to defuse conflict situations before they escalate. They are also more likely to use effective conflict resolution strategies when disagreements do occur. The case of Nick Cunningham and Mansfield illustrates how unaddressed interpersonal tensions during a corporate merger can quickly become dysfunctional. By applying the right conflict management style — beginning with accommodation and moving toward compromise and collaboration — and by cultivating emotional intelligence, leaders can transform dysfunctional conflict into a productive, forward-looking working relationship.
References
Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2012). Chapter 10: Conflict and negotiations. Organizational Behavior. Lardbucket.org.
Cliffe, S. (1999). Can this merger be saved? Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 28–44.
Liddle, D. (2017). Managing conflict: A practical guide to resolution in the workplace. [Books24x7 version].
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2015). Chapter 9: Stress and conflict. Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (pp. 258–264). Information Age Publishing.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.