This paper analyzes writing samples from four English Language Learner (ELL) students at different stages of second language acquisition. Drawing on Haynes's (2005) framework of ELL fluency stages, the paper identifies each student's likely proficiency level—early production, speech emergence, or intermediate fluency—based on observable features such as sentence structure, vocabulary range, and error patterns. For each student, the paper describes the assigned writing task, evaluates the evidence pointing to a specific fluency stage, and proposes targeted instructional strategies to support continued language development. The analysis demonstrates how writing samples serve as practical diagnostic tools for classroom teachers working with ELL populations.
English language learning (ELL) students within the United States face a significant challenge when entering the classroom. Unlike other students who already know English and are simply expected to write, ELL students are still required to complete writing assignments while barely grasping the language (Hill, 2009). To make matters even more complicated, ELL students acquire language very differently than native speakers. Remarkably, even under such pressure, most ELL children reach a proficient level relatively quickly and are able to adapt. This transition is best observed through the students' completed work.
The following analysis examines writing samples from four ELL students at different stages of second language acquisition. Each student is evaluated based on sentence structure, vocabulary, and error patterns, with reference to the recognized ELL fluency stages described by Haynes (2005). Targeted instructional strategies are recommended for each learner.
Student one is most likely a middle school aged ELL student with an Asian native language. This student is at near fluency with regard to her writing.
This student was assigned the task of writing her own version of a narrative story. She chose to write about a time when she found a diary and tried to open it. The student was required to write one full page on the subject.
From the student's writing sample, it is clear that she is at the intermediate fluency stage of her ELL development. This is the stage where children actively use roughly 6,000 words, can share their opinions, and form complex sentences (Haynes, 2005). There are three clear examples in the sample that support this conclusion.
The first example is her sentence structure. The sentences are complete and include added expression. For example, she wrote, "I saw her...diary!" It is clear that this student understands how to combine words and punctuation to form meaningful sentences. The second example is her vocabulary. In one sentence she wrote, "I secretly looked everywhere so I could see if it is ther (sp)." She used an advanced adjective and full descriptive words. The final example is one that distinguishes her from an advanced fluency student: errors. Among other issues, including spelling errors, there are very few periods used throughout the paper, examples of incorrect singular/plural usage, and no commas. This student is clearly very close to grasping the English language fully, but has not yet arrived.
A student at this level is relatively easy to guide in the right direction. The recommended approach would be to first encourage the student to become familiar with the English dictionary by circling all of her errors and asking her to correct them, which will help solidify proper spelling. In addition, sentence and grammar worksheets would help ensure she fully comprehends how to properly form sentences.
Student two is most likely a high school aged ELL student with a Spanish native language. This student is at the emergence stage with regard to her writing.
This student was assigned the task of writing a scary story. She chose to write about a haunted house adventure. The student was required to write one full page on the subject.
From the student's writing sample, it is clear that she is at the emerging stage of her ELL development. This is the stage where children use roughly 3,000 basic words, can sound out stories phonetically, and can write brief stories and dialogue journals (Haynes, 2005). There are three clear examples in the sample that support this conclusion.
The first example is her sentence structure. The sentences are complete but simple. For example, she wrote, "Chelsea has black hair and straight hair blue eyes and she is age ten." It is clear that this student understands how to combine words and form sentences, but the words used represent basic vocabulary. None of the words are more than two syllables, and all are basic descriptive words including colors. The second example is her vocabulary. In one sentence she wrote, "Chelsea was playing tag..." This is about as basic as a statement can be: there is a name, a passive verb, and a subject. All the words are simple English words, but they are used properly. The final example is one that distinguishes her from a student at a higher stage: substantial errors. In just the first paragraph she made the following spelling errors: hase, carls, hase, strate, cary, hase, tomd, scaerdy. She does demonstrate a better grasp of grammar than the previous student; however, that may be accounted for by her age. This student is clearly beginning to experiment with the language and learn its nuances.
Because this student seems eager to fully use her vocabulary, additional vocabulary building activities would be beneficial. Spelling correction exercises — in which the teacher circles errors and the student consults a dictionary to make corrections — would also support her development.
"Second high school student at emerging fluency stage"
"Grade school student forming simple structured sentences"
Across all four students, writing samples reveal a clear progression through recognized ELL fluency stages, from early production through speech emergence to intermediate fluency. Each stage presents distinct characteristics in sentence structure, vocabulary range, and error type that allow teachers to diagnose a student's level and respond with targeted instruction. Strategies such as dictionary-based error correction, grammar worksheets, vocabulary-building activities, oral storytelling, and pictorial flashcards are all grounded in the specific needs demonstrated by each student's writing. Thoughtful analysis of student work remains one of the most practical tools available to teachers supporting ELL learners in the classroom.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.