This paper examines environmental management and health and safety practices within a UK printing company, drawing on guidance from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). It identifies key workplace hazards — including poor ventilation, fume exposure, faulty machinery, and fire risk — and outlines a hierarchy of control measures ranging from elimination and substitution to engineering controls and personal protective equipment. The paper also discusses the business case for improving safety standards, including reduced absenteeism, lower insurance costs, and increased productivity. Management frameworks such as OSH standards, risk management systems, and ISO 14001:2004 environmental management systems are evaluated as tools for creating a safer, more efficient workplace.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in the UK identifies the major health and safety concerns in the printing industry as accidents from manual handling, trips and slips, and contact with machinery. HSE guidance indicates that health and safety in the printing workplace should address health topics such as noise, dermatitis, chemicals, and manual handling. It should also factor in safety topics including slips, falls, trips, machinery hazards, explosions, and fires.
This report identifies several health and safety concerns on the printing company's factory floor. The first is an increased risk to the health of employees and visitors from exposure to fumes from UV varnish, ink from the litho printer, and vapors from injection moulds. This risk arises from the frequent breakdown of the air conditioning and ventilation unit, causing a buildup of fumes and vapors on the factory floor and, consequently, in the office area at the front. Health concerns are further elevated by poor ventilation in the small room used to mix inks and in the main production area where solvents are used.
Safety concerns also arise from potential accidents involving machinery. The probability of an accident is high given that one of the format press machines has disabled stop buttons and guard interlocks, making it impossible for anyone to stop the machine in an emergency. Additionally, accidents can result from the poor location of a balcony overlooking the main production area, which is occupied by employees and machinery. The risk from this balcony is high because sections of the rail are removable and the balcony is used to store pallets by forklift.
The risk of fire and explosion is also high due to the buildup of fumes and vapors from both high-flashpoint and low-flashpoint solvents. This risk is compounded by the frequent breakdown of the air conditioning, limited ventilation, and lack of open windows. Finally, the company's overall safety index is low due to a high risk of accidents stemming from a semi-skilled, overworked workforce, a situation that will worsen under future expansion plans.
Improving the health and safety standards of the workplace offers a business financial benefits and a return on investment in meeting legal requirements. Environmental standards set by the company can improve efficiency, reduce staff absenteeism, lower employee turnover, and increase the quality and productivity of work (Wallis 2004). Good safety management systems can assist this printing company in making considerable savings, achievable through the reduction of financial resources spent on insurance premiums and sick pay for employees (Wallis 2004). A health and safety standard combined with an environmental safety strategy will reduce overall health and safety risk factors.
By creating a health and safety workplace policy and increasing environmental management standards, this company will realize several benefits. The policy will address accidents and health concerns, reducing the company's risk level and thereby lowering premium payments and reducing cases of illness caused by fumes and vapors. While the changes and investment required to establish the policy will carry an upfront cost, they will ultimately improve business and management strategies, reduce workload, lower employee absenteeism and sick pay, and increase efficiency and productivity. The result will be increased sales volume, reduced production and running costs, and improved overall profitability.
Hazards and risks are controlled using several measures, including elimination, substitution, isolation, engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee 2009). Control measures encompass all actions taken to eliminate, mitigate, or remove the likelihood of risk exposure or harm.
Elimination: The first procedure is the elimination of hazards and thereby the associated risks. In this factory, this involves eliminating risks associated with the second-floor balcony by fitting all loose rails and finding an alternative storage location for the pallets.
Substitution: The second step is the substitution of a hazard with a lower-risk alternative. This includes improving fume extraction on the production floor to remove all vapors created by high- and low-flashpoint solvents, and improving ventilation in the small room used to mix inks — or finding an open space to mix inks away from the confined room. The small room could then be repurposed for storing pallets, printing media, and paper.
Isolation: Isolating a hazard entails restricting it to a specific part of the plant. In this case, the company can isolate the mixing of inks to an open space away from any electrical outlets. This can take the form of installing a fume cupboard to mix inks and solvents. Isolation also applies to the storage of high- and low-flashpoint solvents, whose vapors are combustible.
Engineering Controls: Using engineering controls entails redesigning a production process to reduce a hazard. In this case, the company should repair the multi-color format press, re-enable its stop buttons, and restore its guard interlocks to reduce the risk of injury when an employee cannot stop the machine. This category also includes constructing and opening windows and increasing ventilation outlets on the factory floor, in the office area, and in storage areas.
Administrative Controls: Administrative controls involve adopting standards for factory operation, environmental management, and health and safety practices. The company must adopt HSE health and safety standards for printing companies and comply with government environmental standards for waste management and disposal, particularly for printing waste and inks. This includes creating a workplace health and safety policy that describes how the company will manage safety and health, and that informs employees and stakeholders of its commitment to these areas. It also entails redistributing work to reduce workloads, renewing the service contract for the air conditioning unit, and training employees on health and safety rules and printing processes to reduce the proportion of semi-skilled workers.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Protective equipment must be provided for all employees and individuals in the production area. This includes gas and toxin masks, earplugs and headphones, gloves, overalls, boots, and safety glasses to reduce exposure to toxic vapors and fumes, spilled inks and solvents, and falling equipment.
"Evaluates OSH, risk management, and ISO 14001 frameworks"
"Weighs costs of safety systems against measurable benefits"
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.