This paper examines a family counseling scenario involving a Korean family that has been attending therapy for five weeks. The paper analyzes the implications of two biblical passages—Mark 10:6–9 and Luke 14:26–27—issued to the family's daughter, evaluating whether their use was appropriate in a therapeutic context. Drawing on the AACC, AAMFT, and IAMFC codes of ethics, the paper addresses boundary violations, the family as the primary client, anti-discrimination obligations, and respect for cultural autonomy. The paper concludes that separating the daughter from the family unit would be ethically problematic and that counselors must uphold professional codes to protect vulnerable clients.
The paper demonstrates applied ethical reasoning by systematically mapping a real counseling scenario onto multiple professional codes of ethics. Rather than discussing ethics in the abstract, the writer identifies specific code sections and explains how each one applies to the facts of the case — a technique central to professional ethics writing in counseling and therapy programs.
The paper opens by framing the scenario and introducing the biblical passages. It then analyzes those passages in context before turning to each major ethical code in sequence. Cultural considerations are addressed near the end before a brief conclusion emphasizing client vulnerability and counselor responsibility. The structure follows a logical progression from contextual interpretation to applied ethical analysis.
In the presented scenario, there are issues that are clear and that are bound to influence both the direction and effectiveness of the family counseling, as well as present significant ethical concerns. To properly evaluate the situation, it is first important to understand the contents of the biblical passages referenced and their implications for the case.
The book of Mark 10:6–9 is relevant in marriage situations and is commonly referenced in marriage ceremonies or when establishing marital boundaries between children and their parents. The book of Luke 14:26–27, on the other hand, is indicative of a spiritual call. The words in this passage can be misrepresented; to understand it more accurately, one needs to refer to situations in the New Testament where Jesus was calling his disciples.
Whereas the first passage would be applicable in setting family boundaries, the second, if used or referenced inappropriately, could be harmful to family ties — particularly in a setting such as the one presented. To gain a clear picture of the implications of these Bible verses, it is important to understand the reasons that prompted their issuance. According to the scenario, the passages were issued to the daughter so that she might see how one must distance themselves and become self-differentiated.
The family has been seeking counseling for the past five weeks and must have sought counseling as a unit. It is essential for a counselor not only to view, but also to treat a group of people operating as a unit as a client whose collective needs must be addressed. According to AACC Code of Ethics 1-540, in family counseling, the family is identified as the primary client and as a unit.
In addition, individuals exist within the group. In this case, the daughter, as an individual in the group, seemed to show signs of independence; however, the problems each member is experiencing are not individual in nature but rather social. These issues are better understood and handled in their social context. Therefore, a boundary violation occurs when the counselor places his or her own needs above the client's needs and gains in the process.
Clients usually become vulnerable in the process of seeking professional expertise and knowledge. This vulnerability increases in cases of group or family counseling, where an individual's reaction can impede the whole process. It is vital for counselors to adhere to codes of ethics to monitor their performance and uphold professionalism, thereby protecting their clients' vulnerability throughout the therapeutic process.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.