This paper examines the article by Charnchai Tangpong and James G. Pesek, which investigates ethical and moral decision making among economic agents in business settings. The review explores two central frameworks — shareholder value ideology and the norm of reciprocity — and evaluates how each shapes managerial decisions affecting suppliers, employees, and customers. The paper summarizes the authors' experimental findings, situates their work within the broader field of business ethics research, and reflects on the implications for understanding organizational behavior. It concludes by identifying remaining gaps in the literature and proposing directions for future inquiry into the forces driving moral and immoral conduct in business.
The paper demonstrates source-based critical reflection: it moves from summarizing an academic article's thesis and methodology, to evaluating the scope and limitations of its findings, to connecting those findings to the writer's own evolving understanding. This technique is characteristic of a well-structured article review or reading response at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens by introducing the authors and their central concerns, then explains the two theoretical frameworks under study. It presents the authors' experimental findings with a direct quotation, evaluates the article's position within the broader research field, and concludes with personal reflection and suggestions for future research. The flow moves logically from summary to evaluation to implication.
Charnchai Tangpong and James G. Pesek commence by recognizing the multitude of problems encountered within the business community, generated by the mixed application of ethics and morals in decision making. The two authors assess the issue of ethical and moral conduct within the modern business context through the lenses of the shareholder value ideology and reciprocity.
The shareholder value ideology argues that stock owners are the ones financing business operations and that the economic agent has the obligation to maximize their investments. On the other hand, the reciprocity concept argues that the economic agent should make decisions in a manner in which their actions are beneficial for the stakeholders who are important for the overall support and success of the firm.
Based on gradual research, Tangpong and Pesek find that there is no direct relationship that could universally explain the moral reasoning of economic agents. As the authors note:
"From the experiment, the ideology of shareholder value significantly increased the likelihood of participants' decision outcome to increase profits at the expense of suppliers (not customers and employees), while the norm of reciprocity significantly decreased the likelihood of participants' decision outcome to increase profits at the expense of suppliers and employees (not customers). This provides mixed support for our ideology of shareholder value and norm of reciprocity hypotheses" (Tangpong and Pesek).
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.