Evidence-Based Practice Culture in Labor and Delivery
This paper examines how to create and sustain a culture of evidence-based practice (EBP) in a labor and delivery unit at an urban hospital, using the clinical question of whether women should be kept NPO (nothing by mouth) during labor as a case example. Part 1 outlines the sequential steps of EBP implementation: selecting a decision-making framework, critically appraising evidence, grading recommendations, incorporating findings into practice, evaluating outcomes, and disseminating results. Part 2 identifies three essential characteristics of effective EBP mentors — knowledge and skill in EBP, credibility with frontline staff, and leadership ability — and explains how each trait supports sustainable EBP adoption in clinical settings.
- Introduction: EBP and the NPO During Labor Question: EBP rationale and institutional culture context
- Steps in Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Framework selection and critical appraisal steps
- Grading Evidence and Moving to Practice: Evidence grading systems and clinical recommendations
- Evaluation and Dissemination of EBP Outcomes: Assessing outcomes and sharing findings broadly
- The Role of EBP Mentors: Why EBP mentors are essential for sustainability
- Core Characteristics of Effective EBP Mentors: Knowledge, credibility, and leadership traits explained
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a concrete clinical scenario — the NPO-during-labor policy — to ground abstract EBP implementation concepts, making the argument practically relevant.
- It moves logically from the steps of EBP implementation to the human infrastructure (mentors) needed to sustain it, creating a two-part structure that builds on itself.
- The three mentor characteristics are supported by specific behavioral examples, not just definitions, which strengthens the analytical depth of Part 2.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — taking established EBP models and grading systems (SORT, GRADE, AGREE II) and applying them to a specific clinical context. Rather than simply describing the frameworks, the author maps each step onto the NPO-during-labor scenario, showing how abstract methodology becomes actionable clinical guidance.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two clearly labeled parts. Part 1 follows a sequential, step-by-step structure tracing the EBP process from framework selection through dissemination. Part 2 shifts to a categorized analysis, using three numbered characteristics (knowledge/skill, credibility, and leadership) to define what makes an effective EBP mentor. Each characteristic is supported by citations and behavioral specifics, lending the argument both theoretical grounding and practical applicability. The conclusion of each part flows naturally into the next, creating a coherent argument for institutional EBP adoption.
Introduction: EBP and the NPO During Labor Question
Using critically appraised and scientifically proven data, nurses can utilize evidence-based practice (EBP) to deliver high-quality healthcare to specific patient populations. In the case of keeping women NPO (nothing by mouth) during labor, EBP provides the best approach for addressing the conflict between professional recommendations and the available scientific evidence (Tucker et al., 2021). An EBP institutional culture must be developed within the labor and delivery floor of an urban hospital to facilitate effective change in practice.
Steps in Implementing Evidence-Based Practice
In the current case, the EBP process has advanced to a research report that does not support keeping women NPO during labor. The next phase of the process is therefore the incorporation of research results into practice. The first step in this phase is to choose a decision-making framework (Chiwaula et al., 2021). Implementation science has shifted to a more systematic approach, with theoretical frameworks guiding the process of translating research into practice.
The next step is a critical appraisal of the evidence. The validity, reliability, and applicability of research to answer the clinical question must be assessed. During the literature search, team members must determine how much high-quality evidence was discovered. The strength of clinical evidence can be measured by assigning an evidence level to each study. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and systematic reviews are generally considered the highest level of evidence for clinical decision-making in most evidence hierarchies.
Grading Evidence and Moving to Practice
The next stage is to assign a grade that helps guide recommendations for putting results into practice. The team's assessment of the strength of evidence for implementing a therapy or intervention determines the recommendation grade. Grades are frequently expressed as A, B, or C, or as plus signs. Although grading is a crucial element of the process, it is not uniform across health professions. Three prominent grading systems include: (1) SORT (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy); (2) the GRADE Working Group (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation); and (3) AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation 2) (Sims et al., 2019).
The next crucial step is to put the evidence into practice. Following a rigorous review of the literature, the team must decide whether to proceed with incorporating the evidence into patient care. A clear plan and robust methodology are required to integrate the best evidence into clinical practice.
The Role of EBP Mentors
EBP mentors are key to integrating EBP into organizational culture and achieving both implementation and sustainability of EBP in practice settings. To accomplish this successfully, three characteristics are considered vital.
References
Chiwaula, C. H., Kanjakaya, P., Chipeta, D., Chikatipwa, A., Kalimbuka, T., Zyambo, L., ... & Jere, D. L. (2021). Introducing evidence-based practice in nursing care delivery, utilizing the Iowa model in intensive care unit at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 14, 100272.
Melnyk, B. M., Tan, A., Hsieh, A. P., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2021). Evidence-based practice culture and mentorship predict EBP implementation, nurse job satisfaction, and intent to stay: Support for the ARCC© model. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(4), 272–281.
Sims, C. R., Warner, M. A., Stelfox, H. T., & Hyder, J. A. (2019). Above the GRADE: Evaluation of guidelines in critical care medicine. Critical Care Medicine, 47(1), 109–113.
Tucker, S., McNett, M., Mazurek Melnyk, B., Hanrahan, K., Hunter, S. C., Kim, B., ... & Kitson, A. (2021). Implementation science: Application of evidence-based practice models to improve healthcare quality. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 76–84.
Wang, M., Zhang, Y. P., & Guo, M. (2021). Development of a cadre of evidence-based practice mentors for nurses: What works? Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(1), 8–14.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.