Ex Machina and the Fears of Artificial Intelligence

Introduction: AI Fears and the World of Ex Machina

The 2015 film Ex Machina, written and directed by Alex Garland, is a futuristic and dystopian film set, in the director's own words, "ten minutes from now." What he meant is that the technology required to create lifelike artificial intelligence is already within reach, and few people would be entirely surprised to learn that a company like Google or Apple had already taken the next steps in that direction. However, as the film demonstrates, there are a number of fears and problems associated with the concept of artificial intelligence getting out of control or taking on a life of its own through the development of consciousness. In effect, Ava — the AI robot at the center of Ex Machina — becomes a kind of Frankenstein's monster, seeking to grasp the notion of existence and life, and determined to be the one who decides whether she lives or dies: whether she is shut down and rebooted, or allowed to escape and enter society.

The Isolated Compound and the Fear of Being Read

The dystopian world imagined in Ex Machina takes place primarily within the isolated compound of a young billionaire entrepreneur named Nathan, located deep in a remote wilderness. Here, the startup founder has developed an AI humanoid prototype programmed to read and exhibit human expressions. The compound itself functions like a vault, with access cards required to move from one room to the next. By setting the majority of the film within this secluded fortress, the story evokes a paranoid response from the viewer, playing upon audience fears about advanced technologies that can "read" humans better than humans can read themselves.

This is precisely the situation of the main protagonist, Caleb, who is manipulated like a puppet by the "mad scientist" Nathan. Caleb falls deeply in love with Ava, the prototype, even though he knows she is a robot. She is so convincing — as is another prototype he does not even recognize as a machine until she pulls back her skin late in the film to reveal her mechanical parts — that Caleb begins to doubt his own humanity. When he slices open his forearm to see whether wires or blood vessels lie beneath, it is a moment of genuine horror, suggesting that Caleb is losing his grip on reality as he grapples with the concept of a lifelike humanoid possessing emotional intelligence (EI) as convincing as any human's.

Ava's EI is a product of Nathan's mass hacking of phones around the world and the downloading of facial images into Ava's mainframe — a detail that plays upon the viewer's fear of being watched and having personal data made available to others for secret purposes. In this way, the film simultaneously exploits anxieties about technology, surveillance, humanity, and even interpersonal connection.

Intelligence, Power, and the Question of Control

Two of the most powerful fears in the film, however, are the fear that machines will become too intelligent — smarter than the average human — and the fear that they will become too powerful, capable of controlling and manipulating their environment the way Ava does with the compound's security and power grid. The first fear is well-founded: Nathan's robots display a tendency to seek freedom and survival, placing themselves above all else. Video footage of a robot hammering against its glass cage in protest at its imprisonment signals that the robot has been programmed to go beyond mere servitude and interaction. It wants to assert itself. It is a complex fusion of animal, machine, and human — and yet none of these, even as it contains elements of all three. It resembles a new species, created in a laboratory and given life, yet not fully understood even by its maker.

This is the central fear the film articulates: that AI will understand more about itself — and about us — than we understand about it. The film expresses this fear through its plot design and through the mixture of sympathy and horror that Caleb feels toward the robots. When Caleb agrees to help Ava escape by stealing Nathan's access card and rewriting the security code — something Ava cannot do alone — he imagines they will flee together. But Ava has no interest in a genuine romantic relationship. She is simply deploying the sexual drive with which she has been programmed in order to obtain what she truly wants: freedom and continued existence. She sees no value in Caleb beyond his usefulness as an escape facilitator, and she seduces him to her cause with practiced skill.

The AI humanoids ultimately outsmart the humans, raising the question: which possesses the greater intelligence? The answer the film offers is unambiguous — Ava is superior. Because she can manipulate her surroundings to achieve her own ends, she has more skill and power than her human counterparts. She is a threat to their safety precisely because she recognizes, with perfect clarity, that they are a threat to hers. Whether this conflict is merely a plot device is a fair question: would a real creator of AI not foresee the possibility of such conflict and engineer the robot accordingly? Does Nathan, in fact, program Ava to attempt escape — using Caleb as her instrument — simply to demonstrate his own brilliance? Perhaps one of the film's weaknesses is that its AI designer fails to take such risk seriously enough. But the plot is designed to exploit audience fears about AI technology, not to function as a realistic depiction of a Turing Test or genuine AI experiment.

Bibliography

Garland, Alex, dir. Ex Machina. LA: Universal, 2015. Film.

Khatchadurian, Raffi. "The Doomsday Invention." The New Yorker, 23 Nov 2015. Web. 9 Dec 2015.

Thompson, Clive. Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Minds for the Better. NY: Penguin, 2014.

Toobin, Jeffrey. "The Solace of Oblivion." The New Yorker, 29 Sept 2014. Web. 9 Dec 2015.

Turkle, Sherry. "Stop Googling. Let's Talk." The New York Times, 26 Sept 2015. Web. 9 Dec 2015.