This paper reviews Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, a landmark political documentary examining President George W. Bush's first term in office. The review discusses Moore's openly one-sided "op-ed" approach, the film's central allegations — including ties between the Bush family and Saudi interests, the handling of the 9/11 attacks, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — as well as its most memorable scenes. The paper also considers the film's broader political effectiveness, noting that despite record-breaking box-office success, Bush's re-election in November 2004 suggests the documentary ultimately preached to an already-converted audience.
Michael Moore's political documentary Fahrenheit 9/11, examining the Bush administration's first four years in office, generated significant controversy and in the process broke all box-office records for the genre. The film remains one of the most discussed and debated documentaries in American political history.
Described by Moore himself as an "op-ed" piece, Fahrenheit 9/11 is anything but a run-of-the-mill documentary. As the film's producer, writer, director, and narrator, Michael Moore has no intention of presenting "the other side of the picture" when judging President George W. Bush and his performance in office. As a result, the film was bound to offend Bush supporters — and does. At the same time, it raises provocative and thought-provoking questions about the Bush administration's handling of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and their aftermath. Not all of the charges against President Bush are new, but they are presented in an innovative manner on film.
The Bush family is accused of having maintained long-standing business relations with the Bin Ladens and other Saudi interests. Moore attributes the government-sponsored evacuation of the Bin Laden family following the 9/11 attacks to this connection. Bush's "War on Terror" in Afghanistan and Iraq is depicted as a cynical attempt to benefit his allies in the oil and defense industries.
"Famous behind-the-scenes Bush and Wolfowitz clips"
"Film's failure to shift 2004 election outcome"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.