Family Tradition vs. Individuality in American Literature
This essay examines how three short literary works explore the tension between family tradition and individual identity. Drawing on Alice Walker's "Everyday Use," Margaret Walker's poem "Lineage," and Seamus Heaney's "Digging," the paper argues that familial customs can either anchor or constrain an individual's sense of self. Each work presents a distinct perspective: Walker's story contrasts wholesale acceptance versus rejection of family values; Margaret Walker's poem depicts a narrator who feels she has fallen short of her ancestors' strength; and Heaney's poem suggests that honoring a family's spirit need not mean replicating its exact practices. Together, the works map a spectrum of responses to inherited tradition.
- Introduction: Family Tradition and Identity: Tradition shapes identity; individuals may accept or reject it
- Alice Walker's 'Everyday Use': Acceptance or Rejection: Two sisters embody total acceptance vs. total rejection
- Margaret Walker's 'Lineage': Living Up to Ancestors: Narrator feels diminished compared to her grandmothers' strength
- Seamus Heaney's 'Digging': Honoring Tradition Through Individual Work: Narrator honors family spirit by writing rather than laboring
- Conclusion: Heritage and Individuality Across the Three Works: Three authors map a spectrum of tradition and individuality
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The introduction establishes a clear thesis about the dual role of family tradition — as both anchor and constraint — before introducing the three texts, giving the comparative analysis a focused lens.
- Each body paragraph is devoted to a single work, making the comparative structure easy to follow and ensuring each text receives adequate close reading.
- The conclusion synthesizes the three authors' contrasting positions rather than merely summarizing, showing the student can move from description to argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis: it reads three distinct texts against a single thematic question (tradition versus individuality) and uses the differences among them to build a nuanced argument. Rather than treating the works in isolation, the student explicitly contrasts Walker's either/or framing with Heaney's integrative vision, showing how juxtaposition can strengthen an analytical claim.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a classic five-part structure: an introduction that frames the central tension and names all three texts; three body paragraphs, one per work, arranged from most conflict-driven to most resolved; and a brief conclusion that maps the spectrum of positions across all three authors. This clear scaffold keeps the comparative argument coherent throughout.
Introduction: Family Tradition and Identity
The traditions of a family serve to help create the collective identity of that family. For some people, this is a benefit because it helps them find their own sense of morals and ethics and allows them to enter the larger world with some of the basic questions of life already answered. For others, however, the pressures of familial culture can inhibit individuality when a person's inner sense of what is appropriate runs counter to the rules imposed by family tradition. The influence that family has on the individual ultimately seems to rest with the individual: they have the option of living up to the customs and traditions of their family or of rejecting those customs and accepting an altogether different identity. These two types of traditional influence can be seen in several works of literature, including Alice Walker's "Everyday Use", Margaret Walker's poem "Lineage," and Seamus Heaney's "Digging."
Alice Walker's 'Everyday Use': Acceptance or Rejection
In Alice Walker's "Everyday Use," two sisters exhibit the difference between embracing family tradition and allowing outside cultural influences to reshape a family dynamic. The two sisters at the heart of the story are very different. Maggie is a traditional girl who has stayed with her mother throughout her life and harbors only the ambition of marrying and beginning her own family. Her sister Dee is the complete opposite. Her world is much larger, and so her personality is different. She has been shaped by education and by new social ideas, so much so that very little of her upbringing remains visible in her character. Dee has never been comfortable with her family's values and has spent her life trying to distance herself from their principles in pursuit of what she believes is a better way of living.
When Dee arrives home, she and her male companion have embraced an identity built around what they perceive as traditional Africanism. The conflict comes to a head when Dee attempts to take quilts that have belonged to the family for generations. She sees them as artworks — objects to display as evidence of her new identity — while Maggie and their mother use the quilts as blankets. The sisters' values are entirely at odds, and it is evident from the text that the mother and Dee will never be as close as the mother and Maggie, because their values are too different. When a person breaks away from the perspective of the family unit, meaningful communication can become very difficult. That is not to say Dee is wrong to break away, only that her view of the world has diverged sharply and that this divergence is a consequence of separating from familial tradition. In Walker's story, the choice seems to be either accepting the family in all its positives and negatives, or breaking away entirely and formulating a unique identity that is not necessarily an improvement. Walker does not appear to allow for a middle ground.
Margaret Walker's 'Lineage': Living Up to Ancestors
The narrator of Margaret Walker's "Lineage" is separated from the actions of her ancestors — whom she calls her "grandmothers." This voice reflects on the people who came before her and, in comparing herself to those ancestors, finds herself lacking. Her grandmothers were able to use their muscles and work the land. They were physically strong and, by extension, mentally strong, capable of performing hard labor to support their families without surrendering to despair over their own constrained ambitions. Unlike her grandmothers, this narrator does not believe she is living fully. The scents and sounds she associates with her grandmothers suggest lives wholly and authentically lived. She laments that she is not as strong as they were.
It is unclear whether she despairs because she has not lived up to her potential or because she is emotionally fragile, but she regards herself as less than those who came before her. This feeling speaks to an important aspect of familial custom and tradition: when someone in your family was powerful or achieved a measure of success, either within the home or in the larger world, pressure falls upon the next generation to match or surpass that achievement. The narrator clearly does not believe herself capable of doing so, and she has given up trying.
Conclusion: Heritage and Individuality Across the Three Works
The three works present different perspectives on the conflict between heritage and individuality. The stronger a person's familial culture, the more pressure is upon the individual to agree with that culture and take part in it. Alice Walker and Margaret Walker both suggest that a family's customs must be accepted on their own terms, or else a person risks isolating themselves from the family altogether. Heaney, on the other hand, believes that a person can embrace the virtues of family tradition while still achieving their own individual identity.
Works Cited
James, Missy, and Alan P. Merickel. Reading Literature and Writing Argument. 5th ed., Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2013.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.