This paper examines the relationship between family violence and health outcomes, focusing on intimate partner violence (IPV), child abuse, and related forms of domestic abuse. Drawing on national surveys, U.S. Department of Justice data, and the Healthy People 2010 initiative, the paper documents how family violence contributes to physical injuries, mental health disorders, substance abuse, reproductive health risks, and chronic illness. The paper also applies the field model of determinants of health to frame a holistic nursing response, arguing that advanced nursing practice must address the full range of psychological, social, and physical factors that characterize family violence situations.
The paper demonstrates effective use of institutional and government sources to substantiate epidemiological claims. By anchoring each health outcome in a named study or federal initiative, the author builds credibility and shows readers how to ground policy-relevant arguments in authoritative data rather than anecdote.
The paper opens with a broad framing of domestic violence as underreported and socially complex. It then moves through family profiles and specific health consequences of IPV, covering physical, mental, reproductive, and behavioral health risks. A dedicated discussion of child psychological impacts follows before the paper turns to the field model of health determinants and Healthy People 2010 objectives. The conclusion synthesizes the argument through the lens of holistic nursing practice.
Domestic violence is one of the most underreported and insidious forms of violence in our society. The complex nature of this violence, and the fact that it takes place in the privacy of the home, often complicates reporting and hampers the development and implementation of effective solutions to this widespread problem. Research shows that domestic violence has a profound effect on society and carries serious implications for psychological and community health and well-being.
Family violence encompasses a wide variety of factors that contribute to morbidity and health issues, including child abuse and the increasing prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV). Central to this paper is the argument that psychological and physical abuse can lead to a wide range of health issues that exacerbate the family situation. As many studies indicate, the extent and dimensions of family violence are often difficult to determine due to the variety of data sources and privacy concerns involved (Family Violence).
According to the National Family Violence Survey, it is estimated that one in six couples experiences intimate partner violence (Brewster, 2002, p. 24). A study considered to be more accurate — the National Violence Against Women Survey, conducted by the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — surveyed 16,000 men and women and revealed that 1.5 million women and 830,000 men are victims of intimate violence each year in the United States. About 1.5% of the women surveyed reported having been physically assaulted and/or raped by a current or former intimate partner within the past year, and approximately one quarter had been assaulted or raped by an intimate partner within their lifetime. This study also indicates that there are strong signs that family and domestic violence is increasing at an alarming rate (Brewster, 2002, p. 24).
In light of these findings, several relevant aims articulated as part of the Healthy People 2010 (HP2010) injury and violence prevention goals include the following objectives:
It should also be noted that victims of domestic violence are more likely to attempt suicide and to experience mental health problems (Castillo and Alexander).
There are numerous factors to consider with regard to family profiles and domestic violence. Some studies indicate that urban rather than rural populations are more likely to experience family violence, though the data on this point are conflicting. One statistic that does show consistency, however, is that women suffer the most through domestic violence. A recent study by the U.S. Department of Justice reports that "intimate partner violence is primarily a crime against women… Of those victimized by an intimate partner, 85% are women and 15% are men. In other words, women are 5 to 8 times more likely than men to be victimized by an intimate partner" (Domestic Violence Facts).
More significant and less debatable are the various health issues related to and comorbid with family violence. Intentional injuries, as identified by Healthy People 2010, are strongly linked to family and intimate partner violence. Sexual assault, child abuse, and elder abuse all fall within the scope of family violence. A related dimension is that spousal abuse is often linked to child abuse: "Data from the 1997 U.S. Department of Justice National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) for 12 states show that 13% of child abuse incidents reported to the police are associated with spouse abuse" (Castillo and Alexander).
These forms of family violence can lead to serious health consequences, both psychological and physical. The figures regarding IPV are particularly alarming: "Nearly one-third of American women will experience intimate partner violence (IPV) as the leading cause of female homicides and injury-related deaths during pregnancy. IPV also accounts for a significant proportion of injuries and emergency room visits for women" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
The Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF) defines Intimate Partner Violence as "a pattern of assaultive and coercive behaviors that may include inflicted physical injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive social isolation, stalking, deprivation, intimidation and threats. These behaviors are perpetrated by someone who is, was, or wishes to be involved in an intimate or dating relationship with an adult or adolescent, and are aimed at establishing control by one partner over the other" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
IPV can produce a variety of psychological ailments, such as depression and anxiety, that affect both quality of life and social functioning. Research has linked IPV to some of the most significant health indicators defined in the federal Healthy People 2010 initiative. For instance, "women who have been victimized by an intimate partner and children raised in violent households are more likely to experience a wide array of physical and mental health conditions including frequent headaches, gastrointestinal problems, depression, anxiety, sleep problems and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
Another important health issue related to family violence is obesity. Results from a project by the Family Violence Prevention Fund suggest a close correlation between IPV and obesity. Numerous studies have found a significant relationship between family violence — particularly against women — and morbid obesity and disturbed eating behaviors (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
Studies also link addictive behaviors and their attendant health risks to the consequences of family violence. For example, in a study of 557 women, 42% of those who reported a history of lifetime IPV currently smoked cigarettes (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet). Alcohol abuse and its associated health risks are similarly connected to spousal abuse: "Spousal abuse has been identified as a predictor of developing a substance abuse problem. Additionally, women in abusive relationships have often reported being coerced into using alcohol by their partners" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
Another area of concern is the abuse imposed on women during pregnancy, which is also linked to drug and substance use within violent family situations. In a study of more than 2,000 prenatal patients in North Carolina, "victims of violence were significantly more likely to use multiple substances before and during pregnancy than women who had not experienced IPV" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
Women who experience family violence also tend to engage in sexual behaviors with negative health outcomes, and there is a higher rate of abortion-seeking among women from violent families — with subsequent health risks. "In a study of 486 women seeking an abortion, 39.5% reported abuse" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
This dynamic is also connected to serious health risks such as HIV/AIDS. Violence often occurs after an HIV diagnosis: "In a study of 310 HIV-positive women, 68% had experienced physical abuse as adults, 32% had experienced sexual abuse as adults, and 45% experienced abuse after being diagnosed with HIV" (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
Additional health-related findings from the Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet indicate that women with a history of IPV are more likely to experience pelvic inflammatory disease, invasive cervical cancer, and preinvasive cervical neoplasia (Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet).
In the final analysis, the health issues relating to family violence constitute a complex and sensitive area that requires professional care and insight. The contemporary professional nurse and healthcare worker must be aware of the various dimensions of this problem. There have been profound changes in the nursing profession that accord with this holistic approach. The modern nurse is no longer seen merely as an adjunct to the medical process, but rather as an expert in a field that is unique in its wide-ranging and inclusive character.
The holistic treatment of the patient means, in effect, that health and medical needs are addressed across physical, social, and psychological dimensions. In short, holistic theory expands the range and depth of nursing responsibilities. "Nursing theorists often describe the care of the patient as attending to the whole patient. Such theories emphasize the interaction of the physical, psychological, sociocultural, and spiritual dimensions of the patient in a model of holistic care" (Engebretson). This view aligns with the objectives of the Healthy People 2010 project and is especially relevant to the treatment of health issues that arise within the context of family violence.
Brewster, Mary P. "Domestic Violence Theories, Research, and Practice Implications." Handbook of Domestic Violence Intervention Strategies: Policies, Programs, and Legal Remedies. Ed. Albert R. Roberts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 23–44.
Castillo, G. and Alexander, J. Injury and Violence Prevention in Rural Areas: A Literature Review. Retrieved 20 August 2006.
Coker, A.L., Sanderson, M., Fadden, M.K., and Pirisi, L. "Intimate Partner Violence and Cervical Neoplasia." Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 9.9 (2000): 1015–1023.
Domestic Violence Facts. Retrieved 20 August 2006.
Engebretson, Joan. "Hands-on: The Persistent Metaphor in Nursing." Holistic Nursing Practice. 1 July 2002.
Family Violence. Retrieved 20 August 2006.
Intimate Partner Violence and Healthy People 2010 Fact Sheet. Retrieved 19 August 2006.
Leading Health Indicators for Healthy People 2010: Final Report. 1999. Retrieved 19 August 2006.
Maher, B. "Patching Up the American Family." World and I 18 (January 2003).
Preventing Domestic Violence: Clinical Guidelines on Routine Screening. Family Violence Prevention Fund. San Francisco, CA, 1999.
Regional Healthy People 2010 Information Page. Retrieved 22 August 2006.
Sandelowski, Margarete. "Looking To Care or Caring To Look? Technology and the Rise of Spectacular Nursing." Holistic Nursing Practice. 1 July 1998.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.