Flood Myths: Epic of Gilgamesh vs. Book of Genesis
This paper examines the striking parallels between the flood narrative in the Biblical Book of Genesis and its Mesopotamian counterpart in the Epic of Gilgamesh. The author argues that the Genesis account, attributed to approximately 1400–1200 B.C.E., may derive from the earlier Gilgamesh epic, composed around 2000 B.C.E. Key similarities analyzed include the gods' displeasure with humanity, divine commands to build a vessel and preserve living creatures, specific instructions regarding the vessels' dimensions, the release of birds to test receding floodwaters, and the final blessing of each story's survivor — Noah and Utnapishtim respectively. Together, these parallels suggest a shared ancient tradition underlying both texts.
- Introduction: Two Ancient Flood Traditions: Genesis flood narrative may derive from Gilgamesh
- Divine Displeasure and the Decision to Flood: Gods punish humanity's wickedness with a great flood
- Commands to Build a Vessel and Preserve Life: Both heroes ordered to build ships and save creatures
- Vessel Dimensions and Construction Details: Parallel cubit measurements given for each vessel
- The Release of Birds and the Receding Waters: Birds released to detect dry land after the flood
- Divine Blessings and the Conclusion of Both Myths: Noah and Utnapishtim rewarded by their respective gods
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper builds its argument methodically, moving point by point through parallel elements in both texts rather than discussing each narrative separately, making the similarities immediately clear to the reader.
- Direct quotations from primary sources — the King James Bible, Kovacs's translation of Gilgamesh, and Magill's Masterplots — ground every claim in textual evidence rather than paraphrase alone.
- The thesis is stated concisely in the opening paragraph, giving the reader a clear interpretive frame before the evidence is presented.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective parallel-text comparison: rather than summarizing one work and then the other, the author pairs corresponding passages side by side. This technique makes similarities visible at the sentence level and gives the argument cumulative force as each new parallel reinforces the central claim of derivation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a thesis linking the two texts chronologically, then develops five parallel points — divine motivation, the command to build, the instructions for dimensions, the release of birds, and the divine blessing — each supported by direct quotation. A brief works-cited list closes the paper. The structure is tightly focused and linear, suited to a short comparative essay at the undergraduate introductory level.
Introduction: Two Ancient Flood Traditions
The Biblical story of the Flood as found in the Book of Genesis contains many similarities to the Mesopotamian myth known as the Epic of Gilgamesh. In fact, it appears that the Biblical account, as related by Noah around 1400–1200 B.C.E., may have been derived entirely from the Epic of Gilgamesh, written some six hundred years earlier around 2000 B.C.E., when the so-called Flood Myths had their origins.
Works Cited
Clough, Brenda W. A Short Discussion on the Influence of the Gilgamesh Epic on the Bible. Internet. July 3, 1999. Accessed March 5, 2003.
Kovacs, Maureen G. The Epic of Gilgamesh. Connecticut: Stanford University Press, 1989.
Magill, Frank N., Ed. Masterplots. Vol. 4. New York: Salem Press, 1964.
Mendelsohn, Isaac. Religions of the Ancient Near East. New York: Library of Religion, 1955: 100–06.
The Holy Bible. Authorized King James Version. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.