This essay examines the Epic of Gilgamesh as one of the earliest known epic poems, focusing on its flood narrative and the striking parallels it shares with the Biblical story of Noah in Genesis. The paper compares the figures of Utnapishtim and Noah, noting similarities in divine warning, ark construction, animal preservation, and the use of released animals to signal the flood's end. It also situates these parallels within a broader cross-cultural context, noting that flood narratives appear across many ancient civilizations. The essay concludes by analyzing the social and ideological functions of these myths, including the reinforcement of divine authority, social order, and a sense of cultural identity and elitism among ancient peoples.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is one of the earliest epic poems ever written. Not surprisingly, it parallels a number of other creation myths, particularly in its references to a great flood that cleansed the earth. Such a flood narrative can be found not only in the Sumerian and Babylonian tradition in which Gilgamesh was composed, but also in various Chinese and Indian (from the country of India, not Native Americans) creation myths as well.
It is fairly obvious that the flood story chronicled in Gilgamesh bears a striking number of similarities to the flood story told in the Bible's Book of Genesis. In this latter tale, Noah is told by God that, due to the wickedness taking place throughout the earth, God intends to destroy the entire world and everything in it to make way for a new race of people — except for Noah and his family. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, Utnapishtim conveys that there was also a point at which his gods were going to destroy the world, yet were willing to preserve him and his family.
That means of preservation is remarkably similar to that which enabled Noah to escape the flood. Both men essentially built an ark, the dimensions of which were precisely outlined by their respective gods. Moreover, the inhabitants of those arks included not only these men and their families, but also at least one of every animal that existed — in Genesis, a pair of each species was included to account for the repopulation of animals after the flood.
After following these divine instructions, both Noah and Utnapishtim built their boats and endured terrible floods that eradicated all other inhabitants of the earth, except for those safely sheltered in their vessels. There are also striking similarities in how these tales conclude. Both men were able to determine that the flood had ended and that it was safe to disembark by releasing animals to "test" whether the earth was truly safe to reclaim. While this parallel is particularly salient in the tales of Gilgamesh and Genesis, it is vital to recognize that virtually every ancient civilization has some form of this narrative, in which the gods send a great flood to destroy the earth and then begin the world anew.
"Myths reinforce divine authority and social order"
"Myths justify existence and promote cultural elitism"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.