This essay analyzes the Epic of Gilgamesh as both a character study and a thematic work, examining how the ancient Sumerian narrative addresses universal questions about mortality, friendship, and what it means to be human. Beginning with Gilgamesh's tyrannical rule and his transformation through companionship with the wild man Enkidu, the essay traces the hero's spiritual journey toward acceptance of death. It considers how Enkidu's death catalyzes Gilgamesh's search for immortality, how encounters with figures such as Utnapishtim challenge him, and how his ultimate return to Uruk signals hard-won wisdom. The paper concludes that Gilgamesh achieves a form of lasting legacy through leadership and storytelling.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is an ancient Sumerian legend about a semi-divine king. Etched on a series of clay tablets in the third millennium BC, the Epic of Gilgamesh remains relevant in the twenty-first century. Its characters and themes are universal and archetypal. Although some of the original story has been lost because certain clay tablets were destroyed, enough of the epic survives to reconstruct a cohesive narrative. Different translations of the ancient Sumerian do not alter the meaning of the epic. The story introduces Gilgamesh as the King of Uruk, a man who is two-thirds god and one-third man. The epic explores what it means to be human, and Gilgamesh also learns about the relationship between human beings and the divine. His encounters with Enkidu teach him about the nature of mortality — the meaning of life and of death. Modern readers can therefore appreciate the Epic of Gilgamesh for its insights into human nature, human consciousness, and human history.
To understand the central meaning of the Epic of Gilgamesh, readers must examine its basic plot and how it is structured. Doing so allows us to ask questions about the characters' motives. From a character's actions, readers learn about his or her personality traits. The narrator of the epic also helps the reader believe in the plot and characters — we accept what the narrator is saying in order to enjoy the story and appreciate it as a work of literature. Accepting the narrator's words allows us to view the story as a cohesive whole. The Epic of Gilgamesh is both a character study and a thematic work.
The narrator informs us early on that Gilgamesh is two-thirds god and one-third man. This detail sets the tone for the rest of the tale, because it is Gilgamesh's divided nature that generates the central conflicts of the story. The title character is driven by conflicting urges; he does not quite understand how to be either god or man. His conflicted nature causes him personal turmoil, especially as he develops a friendship with Enkidu and learns more about the meaning of life, death, and immortality. Gilgamesh is a heroic man, and thus he is mortal in spite of his semi-divine nature. One of his central personal tests is to reconcile himself with his mortality and with his humanity. It is precisely that mortality which makes him more capable of accepting his human nature. Ultimately, Gilgamesh learns to accept that he will die.
When we first encounter Gilgamesh, he is a powerful and dictatorial ruler. He is not the shepherd of his people but a tyrant who wields authority recklessly and egotistically. As a result, the people petition the gods for help. To answer their plea, the gods create a strong man named Enkidu. Enkidu is wild; he lives in the woods and is uncivilized. He was designed to be a perfect match for Gilgamesh, who represents the corrupting force of civilization. Eventually, Gilgamesh and Enkidu fight, and through their encounter they develop tremendous mutual respect and a deep friendship. It is that friendship which helps Gilgamesh realize the meaning of humanity. Enkidu's death later teaches Gilgamesh about mortality, forcing him to confront his own.
Enkidu is the central means by which the narrator introduces the themes of humanity and civilization. As a wild man, Enkidu is uncivilized. After sleeping with a woman, he gains a taste of what it means to be civilized and consequently loses his fully wild nature. In a sense, Enkidu falls from a state of grace and must now contend with the trappings of civilization. His fall ejects him from the world of beasts and draws him closer to Gilgamesh. The friendship leads ultimately to his death, because as he grows closer to Gilgamesh the two men embark on heroic quests together.
Among their shared adventures, Gilgamesh and Enkidu take on the formidable monster Humbaba. They triumph over the beast with the help of the gods. As a result, the goddess Ishtar falls in love with Gilgamesh. Ishtar, the goddess of love, expects her affections to be returned, but Gilgamesh rejects her. Enraged, Ishtar persuades the gods to send the Bull of Heaven as punishment. Together, Gilgamesh and Enkidu kill the bull. The gods view this as an insult and resolve to punish the two men. They afflict Enkidu with illness, and he soon dies.
"Grief, fear of death, and the wilderness journey"
"Utnapishtim's test and the stolen plant of immortality"
"Gilgamesh rebuilds, leads wisely, and achieves lasting legacy"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.