This paper examines Ford Motor Company's international financial management through the lens of globalization, flexible exchange rate systems, and balance of payments analysis. It explores how globalization and comparative advantage theory inform Ford's outsourcing decisions, how floating exchange rates create both opportunities and risks for the automaker, and how balance of payments data shapes Ford's market strategies. A focused case study on Greece illustrates these concepts in a real-world context, considering the country's sovereign debt crisis and its implications for Ford's positioning in the European market. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for Ford's continued presence in Greece.
The paper demonstrates applied concept analysis: it introduces each financial concept (e.g., floating exchange rate, balance of payments) with a brief definition, then immediately applies it to Ford's specific situation. This structure — define, then apply — is a reliable and clear technique for business and economics papers, helping readers understand both the concept and its relevance simultaneously.
The paper is organized into six sections. An introductory section establishes Ford's industrial context, followed by three analytical sections covering globalization, exchange rate systems, and balance of payments respectively. A fifth section applies all three frameworks to the Greece case study. A brief conclusion synthesizes the findings and restates the core recommendations. This funnel structure — broad theory narrowing to a specific country case — is well suited to international business analysis.
The American automobile industry has faced the continued threats of the internationalized economic crisis. Demand for automobiles has decreased — a trend driven not only by the crisis itself, but also by the inability of American automakers to adjust their offerings to the emergent demands of consumers. As the population confronted rising oil prices and grew more environmentally conscious, consumers demanded smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles, yet the industry failed to adapt its product line accordingly. Gradually, the American auto industry began generating declining revenues, closing plants, and downsizing its workforce. The onset of the economic crisis only aggravated this trend.
Ford Motor Company is one of the American automakers that followed this trajectory. Yet while it did close plants and reduce staffing, Ford turned the threat of the crisis into an opportunity by using the period to focus on internal restructuring and organizational strengthening. These efforts are evident both within the United States and across its global operations.
Within the global market, the automobile manufacturer is affected by numerous additional forces. The international financial sector is one of the most significant, and this paper assesses Ford through the lens of several specific issues: globalization and its impact on financial management, flexible exchange rate systems, balance of payments analysis, and a focused case study on Greece.
Globalization is generally understood as the weakening of borders between countries — a process that allows economic, political, and cultural values to transcend national boundaries and influence corresponding values elsewhere. Globalization is most visible at the practical level, through the liberalization of markets and the free circulation of resources. As a result, people can travel more freely, capital can circulate with greater ease, and commodities can be transported from one region to another with fewer barriers.
The current trend of globalization is one of continued liberalization. Countries across the globe sign free trade agreements, and these international arrangements are largely overseen by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which promotes the elimination of trade barriers and the expansion of open markets.
One important application of globalization is that it creates the conditions for applying David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage. According to this theory, each country is better positioned to produce certain goods for which it holds a comparative advantage. Countries should therefore concentrate on producing items in which they have an advantage and exchange them in international markets for items they would produce less efficiently. As globalization deepens, this theory becomes increasingly applicable. The sources of comparative advantage vary widely and may include an abundance of natural resources, technological development, or a cost-effective labor force.
The management team at Ford Motor Company has recognized this opportunity and has opened manufacturing plants in more cost-effective regions. The comparative advantage they sought was primarily labor cost efficiency — the belief that plants in foreign regions would operate at lower costs than those in the United States, thereby allowing Ford to retain more profit.
This international financial management decision reflects the practice of outsourcing — taking work outside the original company and having it completed in a different region in order to benefit from that region's comparative advantage. Beyond the primary goal of generating higher profits, outsourcing also produced a secondary benefit for Ford: by relocating certain operations, the company could focus more intensively on its core competencies. Management became better positioned to concentrate on administration, internal processes, marketing, and design — all of which are central to the Ford brand and contribute significantly to sales and long-term success.
As part of the broader process of market liberalization, the international community has moved toward allowing currency exchange rates to be determined by market forces — the supply and demand for a given currency relative to others. In this system, the role of governments and central banks is reduced, as they intervene less in the setting of exchange rates. As defined by Investopedia, a floating exchange rate is one in which "a country's exchange rate regime [allows] its currency [to be] set by the foreign-exchange market through supply and demand for that particular currency relative to other currencies. Thus, floating exchange rates change freely and are determined by trading in the forex market" (Investopedia, 2011).
The flexible exchange rate system affects Ford at multiple levels. Among the notable advantages:
When selling automobiles in countries with flexible exchange rate systems, Ford is protected against extreme currency rigidity, allowing for more natural price adjustments. Additionally, by operating in countries that implement flexible exchange rates, Ford can avoid certain crisis scenarios: if major shifts in currency values occur, the flexible system allows these changes to be quickly reflected in prices, reducing the risk of prolonged imbalances. Furthermore, the flexible exchange rate system enables an economy to adjust rapidly to both internal and external shocks — for example, the continually shifting price of oil, which affects price indexes and the purchasing power of automobile consumers.
Nonetheless, the flexible exchange rate system also presents disadvantages for Ford. The company can rarely construct strict long-term financial plans, as floating exchange rates introduce significant uncertainty, which in turn reduces financial discipline. Ford also faces risks from speculation and inflation in countries with floating systems. As Biz/ed notes, flexible rates attract speculative activity, and when the value of a national currency falls, the prices of imports rise and inflation follows (Biz/ed, 2011). For Ford, this could result in one of two outcomes: either an increase in revenues through the sale of the same volume at higher prices, or a contraction of demand caused by reduced consumer purchasing power.
The balance of payments is a national accounting document that records all money flowing into and out of a country. The analysis of a country's balance of payments, combined with key financial planning information, has a significant impact on Ford's financial management decisions. Several notable examples illustrate this relationship:
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.