This paper examines the structure and purpose of free trade agreements (FTAs), explaining how they differ from customs unions and how mechanisms such as rules of origin prevent tax evasion through re-exportation. The paper identifies major FTAs worldwide and discusses their general aims, including reducing trade barriers, encouraging specialization, and creating comparative advantage. A case study of the ASEAN Free Trade Area illustrates how regional economic integration has supported the political stability and economic development of Southeast Asian nations. The paper concludes by reflecting on the relevance of FTAs to international business and globalization, and raises questions about tariff uniformity and the fiscal sustainability of member states.
Free trade agreements are trade blocs created between different countries to encourage commerce by eliminating or reducing tariffs, taxes, and import quotas, and by giving preferential treatment to member countries. Some trade agreements also encourage the free movement of people across borders — a situation commonly referred to as an open border. Countries that choose to form free trade agreements as their mode of economic integration are said to be complementary (Manger, 2005).
A free trade agreement establishes a free trade area between member countries. Members of a free trade area maintain their own individual quotas, tariffs, and customs but do not share a common external tariff, which distinguishes a free trade area from a customs union. A customs union is essentially a free trade area that adopts a common external tariff, though it may still have varying quotas. Customs unions are established among competitive economies in order to prevent a deficiency of competition (Kowalczyk & Riezman, 2009).
To prevent tax evasion through re-exportation, members of a free trade area use a system of certifying the origin of goods, commonly referred to as the rules of origin. This system requires that a minimum amount of local material be used in the transformation of goods, thereby adding value to them domestically. Re-exportation occurs when a country charges lower tariffs to non-member countries and then re-exports the goods to another free trade area member tariff-free, effectively circumventing the agreement (Kowalczyk & Riezman, 2009).
Examples of free trade agreements include the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the G-3 Free Trade Agreement (G3), the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA), the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), and the South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) (Kowalczyk & Riezman, 2009).
Free trade agreements generally aim to eliminate significant barriers to trade between member states. By reducing or eliminating trade tariffs and import quotas, they enable the easier exchange of goods and services. As a result, goods can pass from one country to another with fewer delays at the border, allowing trade to flow faster and more efficiently. Furthermore, because free trade area agreements typically harmonize taxes and regulations across members, the overall environment for trade is improved (Jason & Dayton, 2008).
Free trade areas, as a form of economic integration, help grow member economies by encouraging the division of labor, specialization, and the development of comparative advantage. In an unrestricted marketplace, each producer tends to specialize in the activity that gives it a comparative advantage. Consequently, net revenues for member countries increase, boosting their overall economies (Jason & Dayton, 2008).
The ASEAN Free Trade Area was established in 1993, partly as a result of the end of the Cambodian conflict. Its creation helped open up the Southeast Asian (SEA) region to new trade partnerships and stronger international negotiations. This development increased the volume of trade and strengthened cooperation among SEA countries in their efforts to improve their economies and living standards. In the early years of ASEAN, the economic development of SEA countries was extremely low. However, the region has since grown into a significant player in the global trade market, furthering economic development across the region (Tay, 2001).
ASEAN has also contributed to economic development by helping to maintain the political stability of the region. This stability, in turn, has facilitated collaboration with international organizations such as the World Bank and the IMF to secure funding for various industries and development projects in SEA countries (Keling, Som, Saludin, Shuib, & Ajis, 2011).
The economies of ASEAN member nations are largely primary producers, and manufacturing industries had not been fully developed, contributing relatively little to the national GDP of SEA countries. The level of industrialization also varies significantly among member states, which can be attributed to differences in the size of each country's domestic market and its overall stage of economic development. Singapore and Indonesia have benefited substantially from ASEAN, as they are among the larger SEA economies. Malaysia has also benefited considerably due to its high degree of industrialization and its role as an outsourcing hub for companies seeking lower labor and input costs (Keling et al., 2011).
"FTAs, globalization challenges, and policy requirements"
"Student reflections and open questions on FTA sustainability"
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.