This paper examines the economic effects of international trade restrictions — including tariffs, quotas, and sanctions — on international commerce and domestic production costs. Using NAFTA and a hypothetical auto parts manufacturer as a practical example, the paper illustrates how free trade lowers production costs through access to cheaper labor, while restrictive policies raise prices for consumers and redirect domestic resources. The paper also addresses when trade restrictions may be justified, acknowledging exceptions such as national security and responses to unfair trading practices, while generally arguing in favor of free trade and the principle of comparative advantage.
A lack of free trade reduces overall international trade. Domestic consumers reduce their consumption of goods as prices rise due to tariffs, quotas, and similar measures. As a result, restrictive trade policies will either directly or indirectly cause imports to fall (Wallenius). Interestingly, however, restrictive commercial policies may actually decrease costs of production for domestic producers (Wallenius). Higher prices make it profitable for domestic producers of a protected product to increase their output. As this happens, resources are attracted into the protected industry and away from other sectors of the economy.
Understanding these dynamics is central to evaluating international trade policy. When governments impose tariffs or quotas, the immediate effect is a price increase for imported goods, which shifts consumer demand and redirects investment toward domestic production — often at greater overall economic cost.
Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), there are no tariffs or sanctions on auto parts imported from Mexico into the United States. As a result, a manufacturer such as Acme can take advantage of cheaper labor rates available in Mexico by producing auto engines there and then shipping them into the U.S. This arrangement lowers production costs and generates greater profit margins. Conversely, had trade restrictions existed, they would have increased the cost of the product, and Acme would have passed that cost on to the consumer.
This example illustrates how free trade agreements can directly benefit firms by enabling them to source components from the most cost-efficient locations, reducing per-unit production costs and keeping final prices competitive for end consumers.
"Arguments for free trade with acknowledged exceptions"
"Cited sources on trade policy and comparative advantage"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.