Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,337 words

FTX Collapse and the Crypto Market Catastrophe Explained

~7 min read 5 sections Finance · Corporate Finance
Abstract

This paper examines the collapse of FTX, the crypto exchange co-founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, situating it within the broader context of cryptocurrency market volatility, inadequate regulation, and reckless risk management. The paper explains what crypto exchanges are, how FTX projected legitimacy while allegedly commingling client funds, and how a public confrontation between FTX and rival exchange Binance triggered the firm's bankruptcy. Drawing parallels to traditional banking failures such as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, the paper argues that FTX's collapse reflects systemic problems of over-leverage and fraud that appear across financial systems — and considers what the fallout means for the future of crypto markets.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Crypto Exchanges and the Regulatory Gap: Regulatory vacuum enables fraud in crypto markets
  • Bitcoin's Rise, the Crypto Winter, and the Skeptic's Case: Bitcoin's origins, price crash, and skeptic arguments
  • What Is a Crypto Exchange and Why Did People Trust FTX?: How exchanges work and FTX's manufactured legitimacy
  • How FTX Collapsed: Leverage, Fraud, and a Rival's Tweet: CZ's tweet triggers FTX bankruptcy and client panic
  • Risk Management, Accountability, and the Road Ahead: Leverage dangers and crypto's uncertain survival
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds abstract financial concepts — commingling of funds, rehypothecation, margin calls — in concrete, timely examples that make them accessible to a general academic audience.
  • It draws a provocative and analytically useful parallel between FTX's alleged misconduct and standard banking practices, giving the argument genuine critical depth rather than simple condemnation.
  • The narrative arc is well-paced: it moves from broad crypto context, to exchange mechanics, to the specific FTX collapse, and finally to lessons about risk management, creating a coherent analytical journey.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper effectively uses analogy as an analytical tool. By comparing FTX's alleged fund commingling to the legally sanctioned banking practice of rehypothecation, the author challenges the reader to consider whether the real distinction between fraud and accepted finance is accountability rather than behavior. This rhetorical move elevates a news-driven topic into a critical argument about systemic financial risk.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with an abstract that frames the regulatory vacuum enabling crypto fraud, then introduces the commingling-of-funds allegation against FTX. The body traces Bitcoin's origins and the 2022 crypto winter before explaining exchange mechanics and FTX's manufactured legitimacy. It then reconstructs the collapse sequence — from Binance CEO CZ's tweets to bankruptcy — and closes with reflections on leverage, risk, and survival of the broader crypto ecosystem. Citations are drawn from Reuters, CoinDesk, Business Insider, Bloomberg, and Coinbase.

Essay 1,337 words

Introduction: Crypto Exchanges and the Regulatory Gap

What sets commodities or securities exchanges apart from the majority of crypto exchanges is that the former are tightly regulated and the latter are not. Some crypto exchanges, like Coinbase, take self-regulation seriously in the hopes of winning over and working with institutional investors — such as BlackRock, a partnership that is very much underway (Tejpaul and Tusar). Others, like FTX, projected an image of professionalism to clients while underneath operating as a shaky house of cards: over-leveraged and, allegedly, using client funds in a Ponzi-type scheme to support their own expansion, growth, and real estate acquisitions in the Bahamas (Qing).

Theoretically, that kind of practice is known as commingling of funds — that is, taking clients' deposited money held in portfolios on an exchange like FTX and mixing it with the exchange's own business funds. That is a serious violation, and FTX stands accused of having done exactly that.

It is worth noting, however, that the big banks engage in a similar practice — only they have a formal word for it: rehypothecation. Regulators, who maintain close relationships with major financial institutions, permit this practice for the supposed good of the broader financial system. The distinction between what FTX allegedly did and what large banks routinely do may be less about the behavior itself and more about accountability and regulatory cover.

Bitcoin's Rise, the Crypto Winter, and the Skeptic's Case

When it comes to asset classes, none is more controversial than crypto. From the start, cryptocurrency has been a head-scratcher for most people. No one really knows the original founder of Bitcoin — the original cryptocurrency. He is known as Satoshi Nakamoto, but that is widely understood to be a pseudonym. Nonetheless, Bitcoin rose from obscurity when early transactions were facilitated by gamers using GPUs who "mined" it and made the network possible. Today, some of the wealthiest companies in the world — like ExxonMobil — are mining Bitcoin, and certain countries have begun to adopt it as legal tender. Yet few people still fully understand how it works, why it has utility, or why it holds any value at all. Some continue to view it as a speculative mania — comparable to tulip-mania or the dot-com bubble — and believe it will ultimately go to zero.

One reason skeptics hold this view is the dramatic price action the crypto market has experienced in recent years. Bitcoin, for instance, fell from an all-time high of $69,000 in November 2021 to a low of approximately $15,460 just one year later. Such a spectacular collapse — in a market pumped up by an accommodative Federal Reserve and priced to perfection — seemed to many skeptics like confirmation of their suspicions. The resulting bear market, commonly called the "crypto winter," was widely regarded as the worst downturn in crypto history.

Much like the crypto winter that followed the 2017 price surge, the winter of 2022 may have more to run — or may be nearing its end. No one knows for certain. But skeptics have accumulated considerable ammunition for their "it's all a con" narrative, and perhaps no single episode has given them more material than the fall of FTX.

What Is a Crypto Exchange and Why Did People Trust FTX?

Before examining FTX specifically, it helps to understand what a crypto exchange is. In simple terms, it is a platform where people can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrency. Like any exchange, users can open an account and hold funds on the platform — but they can also move their funds off the exchange and store them in a personal wallet, using the exchange only when they want to execute a transaction. Some users do both. More cautious participants keep their crypto in private wallets rather than on exchanges, precisely to avoid the risks that events like the FTX collapse made painfully clear.

FTX, however, had cultivated a powerful appearance of legitimacy. It sponsored the World Series, ran television commercials featuring celebrities such as Tom Brady, Steph Curry, and Larry David, and purchased the naming rights to an NBA arena. People trusted it. Sam Bankman-Fried — the young co-founder and public face of FTX — regularly appeared on stage at high-profile events alongside figures like former President Bill Clinton. Author Michael Lewis, best known for The Big Short, was reportedly in the process of writing a book about Bankman-Fried when everything suddenly fell apart.

2 Sections Hidden · 485 words
How FTX Collapsed: Leverage, Fraud, and a Rival's Tweet290 words
In reality, turbulence had been building across the crypto space before FTX's implosion. But the pattern is familiar: exchanges play fast and loose with…
Risk Management, Accountability, and the Road Ahead195 words
The bright side of all this is that crypto survived. The crypto community of miners, stakers, users, and traders remains. The…

Works Cited

Chafkin, Max. "The Winklevii Are the Latest Crypto Founders to Blame Everybody But Themselves." Bloomberg, 2023.

Nelson, Danny. "Ukraine Partners With FTX, Everstake to Launch New Crypto Donation Website." CoinDesk, 2022.

Qing, Koh Gui. "Bankman-Fried's FTX, Senior Staff, Parents Bought Bahamas Property Worth $300 Mln." Reuters, 2022.

Rosen, Phil. "'You're an Absolute Fraud': CME Group CEO Says He Called Out Sam Bankman-Fried the First Time He Met Him, Months Before FTX's Collapse." Business Insider, 2022.

Tejpaul, Brett, and Greg Tusar. "TLDR: Coinbase and BlackRock to Create New Access Points for Institutional Crypto Adoption." Coinbase, 2022. https://www.coinbase.com

Key Concepts in This Paper
FTX Collapse Crypto Exchange Commingling Funds Rehypothecation Crypto Winter Sam Bankman-Fried Over-Leverage Bitcoin Volatility Crypto Regulation Ponzi Scheme
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). FTX Collapse and the Crypto Market Catastrophe Explained. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/ftx-collapse-crypto-market-catastrophe-2177787

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.