Gender Construction in Mona Lisa Smile (2003 Film)
This paper examines the social construction of gender as depicted in the 2003 film Mona Lisa Smile. Drawing on Paula Rothenberg's framework and feminist theory, the paper analyzes how characters at the fictional Wellesley College embody competing gender constructions — conservative, marriage-centered norms on one side and progressive, career-oriented feminism on the other. Key conflicts include art professor Katherine Watson's struggle against institutional conservatism, the firing of a school nurse for dispensing contraception, and student Betty Warren's privileged exemptions rooted in traditional gender roles. The paper argues that the film illustrates how socially constructed gender statuses are taught, enforced, and contested within institutional settings.
- Social Construction of Gender: Theoretical Framework: Defines gender as culturally constructed, not biological
- Overview of Mona Lisa Smile: Film's setting, cast, and central gender tensions
- Katherine Watson and Feminist Resistance: Watson challenges Wellesley's marriage-centered gender norms
- Conservatism, Healthcare, and Gender Conflict: Nurse firing and Betty Warren's privilege illustrate norm enforcement
- Conclusion: Competing gender constructions inevitably clash in institutions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its film analysis in an established theoretical framework — Rothenberg's concept of socially constructed gender statuses — before applying it to specific scenes and characters, giving the argument academic credibility.
- Concrete scene-level examples (the nurse's firing, Betty's class exemptions, Watson's confrontation with the school president) are used to illustrate abstract theoretical claims, keeping the analysis grounded.
- The paper maintains a clear comparative structure, consistently juxtaposing progressive and conservative gender constructions to show how they produce conflict.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied textual analysis: it takes a primary source (the film) and reads specific plot events through the lens of secondary theoretical literature. By quoting both the film's dialogue and Rothenberg's scholarship, the writer bridges popular culture and academic theory — a useful technique in cultural studies and women's studies essays.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction stating its thesis, then establishes the theoretical framework for social construction of gender. It moves into a character-by-character analysis of the film, tracing how each conflict illustrates competing gender constructions. A short conclusion synthesizes the argument and returns to the broader implications for women's studies. The structure is linear and straightforward, making it accessible as an undergraduate analytical essay.
Social Construction of Gender: Theoretical Framework
The 2003 film Mona Lisa Smile contains within its plot and themes a number of examples of gender construction, and its characters play out their roles based largely on the concept of the social construction of gender. This paper examines how gender roles are portrayed in the film, drawing on available literature and critiques of gender as a social construct.
An article in The Feminist Agenda points out that a social construction does not simply appear in the natural world; instead, it is invented or created by society. It is developed through "cultural practices and norms," and as it becomes a social construct it may "govern the practices, customs, and rules concerning" the way we understand and use them (Feminist Agenda). The article explains that various social pressures work to "reinforce the idea that gender is a social construction" rather than some "essence" that originates from biology (Feminist Agenda).
The social construction of gender also means that within each of the two genders there are differences in status, entitlement, language, knowledge, attitude, and goals, among other distinctions. Social statuses are "carefully constructed through prescribed processes of teaching, learning, emulation, and enforcement" (Rothenberg, 2007). Indeed, Rothenberg asserts on page 56 that "gender cannot be equated with biological and physiological differences between human females and males." The "building blocks" of gender are "socially constructed statuses," and that is precisely where gender construction comes into play in Mona Lisa Smile. Social activities, cultural beliefs, and practices eventually distinguish one character's philosophy and goals from another character of the same sex — which is another way of describing the social construction of gender.
Works Cited
Ebert, Roger. "Mona Lisa Smile [2003]." RogerEbert.com. Sun-Times News Group, June 2003. Retrieved July 30, 2014.
Mona Lisa Smile. Revolution Studios / Columbia Pictures. Directed by Mike Newell, produced by Fredward Johanson. 2003.
Rothenberg, Paula S. Race, Class, and Gender in the United States. New York: Macmillan, 2007.
"The Social Construction of Gender." The Feminist Agenda. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://thefeministagenda.blogspot.com. 2009.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.