This paper offers a comparative analysis of two major 2010 publications on global renewable energy: the REN21 Renewables 2010 Global Status Report by Sawin and Martinot, and the UNEP Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010. The paper examines how each report approaches the subject from a distinct angle — one focusing on policy change and technology adoption, the other on public and private financing — while arriving at mutually reinforcing conclusions. Key themes include the rapid geographic diversification of renewable energy, the emerging leadership of China and India, investment growth despite the global recession, and the expanding role of developing nations in biofuels and wind production. The paper also notes a shared limitation: neither report adequately contextualizes renewable energy growth against total non-renewable energy consumption.
The paper demonstrates source synthesis: rather than reviewing each document in isolation, it reads both reports against each other to show where they diverge in methodology and converge in findings. This comparative technique is especially useful in literature reviews and research papers where multiple primary sources address a common phenomenon from different disciplinary angles.
The paper opens with a broad contextual claim about renewable energy growth, then introduces the two reports under review. It proceeds through two rounds of contrast — first on scope (policy vs. finance), then on data methodology — before pivoting to shared findings. The geographic diversification section constitutes the empirical core, drawing heavily on direct quotation. The paper closes with a brief but pointed critique of both reports' shared blind spot regarding the scale of non-renewable energy still in use.
Investment in renewable energy resources has grown exponentially over the last decade. While the availability of renewable technology, its ease of use, and the possibilities for its application have expanded, the costs of such technologies have decreased substantially. These changes, coupled with international pressure and growing interest in renewable energy, have created a wave of policy change and both public and private investment in renewable energy projects and systems — almost in spite of the global recession, with only a slight overall decline in total investment as a result of the economic downturn (Sawin and Martinot; United Nations Environment Programme).
Since the first edition of REN21's annual Renewables Global Status Report in 2005, the renewable energy sector has grown strongly and steadily. Even in 2009, when facing strong headwinds caused by the economic recession, low oil prices, and the lack of an international climate agreement, renewables managed to hold their own. In 2009, governments stepped up efforts to steer their countries out of recession by transforming industries and creating jobs, giving a boost to the renewable energy sector (Sawin and Martinot 4).
The overall trend of growth in renewable resources and policy has in fact been bolstered, to some degree and in some areas, by the desire of many nations to invest in their economies through positive infrastructural development. One of the most significant changes resulting from the global economic downturn has been the motivation among governments and private institutions to reduce waste and invest in renewable technologies that will, both in the short and long run, improve the global energy landscape.
By early 2010, more than 100 countries had some type of policy target and/or promotion policy related to renewable energy, compared with just 55 countries in early 2005. Wind power and solar PV additions reached record highs during 2009, and in both Europe and the United States, renewables accounted for over half of newly installed power capacity that year. More than $150 billion was invested in new renewable energy capacity and manufacturing plants, up from just $30 billion in 2004. For the second year in a row, more money was invested in new renewable energy capacity than in new fossil fuel capacity (Sawin and Martinot 4).
The overall trend, according to Sawin and Martinot, for investment in renewable energy has remained positive and will likely aid in the global financial recovery as well as in the long-term goal of reducing non-renewable energy usage.
Two of the most well-documented and well-developed works addressing global change in this area are: first, Renewables 2010 Global Status Report (Sawin and Martinot), which focuses on global policy change with regard to renewable energy development; and second, Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010: Analysis of Trends and Issues in the Financing of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (United Nations Environment Programme), which addresses global public and private investment in renewable and efficiency technologies. Each document, read alongside the other, illuminates the state of the global renewable energy market and the trends shaping its development.
The first contrast between the two documents is that, although both are global in scope — each delineating different regional and national growth in renewable energy — they address different aspects of that change. Renewables 2010 Global Status Report focuses on technology growth as well as the policy changes driving renewable energy development and adoption across the world, noting remarkable shifts in the global push for renewable energy and the reduction of dependence on non-renewable sources. Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010, by contrast, focuses on the development of public and private sector financing that is making such changes possible.
The second contrasting point is that Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010 develops a broader picture of the situation by also discussing efficiency upgrades and their financing worldwide. The Renewables 2010 Global Status Report, in contrast, addresses only renewable energy development, discussing efficiency only in the minimal context of the renewable fuels themselves — for example, in the case of more efficient feedstocks for biofuel production (Sawin and Martinot 24).
Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010 relies heavily on a single, though extremely comprehensive, interactive database:
"The Bloomberg New Energy Finance Desktop collates all organisations, projects and investments according to transaction type, sector, geography and timing. It covers 32,500 organisations (including start-ups, corporates, venture capital and private equity providers, banks and other investors), 21,500 projects and 17,000 transactions." (United Nations Environment Programme 8)
Renewables 2010 Global Status Report, by contrast, draws on a broader set of statistical sources — 296 mostly discrete resources — seeking a more comprehensive picture of trends rather than focusing on specific project financing.
Sawin, Janet L. and Eric Martinot. "Renewables 2010: Global Status Report." 2010.
United Nations Environment Programme. Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010: Analysis of Trends and Issues in the Financing of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency. Paris: UNEP, New Energy Finance Ltd., Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2010.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.