Globalization of Agriculture, Food Production, and Resources
This paper critically examines Thomas R. DeGregori's arguments in The Environment, Natural Resources and Modern Technology (2002) and Origins of the Organic Agriculture Debate (2003), evaluating his claims that the environmentalist and organic farming movements cause real harm to developing nations by obstructing access to genetically modified crops, pesticides, and modern agricultural technology. The paper surveys DeGregori's provocative rhetoric — including comparisons of environmentalism to fascism — while questioning his uncritical embrace of free-market capitalism as the solution to global hunger. It concludes that while some of his criticisms of ideological excess have merit, his analysis overlooks the legacy of colonialism, the role of government in funding agricultural innovation, and legitimate concerns about industrial farming practices.
- The Ideology and Reality of Modern Food Production: Introduces tension between environmentalist ideology and agricultural technology
- DeGregori's Critique of Organic and Environmental Movements: Overview of DeGregori's core arguments against organic consumerism
- First-World Idealism and Its Consequences for Developing Nations: How consumer ideology harms African and indigenous communities
- The Limits of DeGregori's Free-Market Argument: Colonialism and government funding undercut DeGregori's capitalism thesis
- Rhetoric, Polemic, and the Nazi Analogy: DeGregori's extreme rhetoric and its analytical weaknesses
- Industrial Farming, Food Safety, and Overlooked Concerns: Mad cow disease and industrial farming blind spots in DeGregori
- Conclusion: Separating Ideology from Evidence: Balanced assessment of technology, capitalism, and environmental critique
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper demonstrates critical engagement by not simply summarizing DeGregori's arguments but actively identifying their internal contradictions, such as his simultaneous championing of developing nations while adopting a paternalistic tone toward them.
- It uses specific textual evidence — direct quotations and page references — to support each analytical point, grounding critique in the source material rather than generalization.
- The student effectively balances conceding points to the author (acknowledging the excesses of environmental ideology) while maintaining a clear counterargument about the limits of free-market capitalism.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models source-based argumentation: it reads a non-fiction argument closely, identifies the author's rhetorical strategies (such as the "either/or" framing and the Nazi analogy), and evaluates both the logical and ethical implications of those strategies. This is a strong example of analytical book critique at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a hook contrasting popular environmentalist slogans with a counterargument, then introduces DeGregori's thesis. It proceeds chapter-by-chapter through the books, escalating the critique as DeGregori's rhetoric becomes more extreme. The final section steps back to offer a balanced assessment, acknowledging valid insights while identifying blind spots. The conclusion ties the thread together without introducing new evidence.
The Ideology and Reality of Modern Food Production
"Green is good. Buy organic. Down with genetically modified 'franken foods'!" Such environmentalist assertions have the ring of modern truisms. The impetus to recycle and consume responsibly often carries a moral drive, enforced on every street corner — from the shrill wastebaskets proclaiming "for cans and bottles only" to the supermarket aisles that scream "no pesticides used." The modern distaste for technology can be hypocritical as well as hysterical in its intensity. After all, technological innovations such as the CD transmit far better musical sound quality than the LP (DeGregori, 2002, p. 152). More to the point, the modern revolution in food production and shipping has enabled consumers to access enormous amounts of healthy produce, in and out of season, and to eat high-protein, high-calcium foods at great convenience and relatively little cost.
Not all the world's consumers enjoy this bounty, however. Who is to blame for this? Thomas R. DeGregori, a professor of economics and food science, would suggest that African nations in states of privation and hunger — nations that have turned away food simply because it is genetically modified — are victims of the modern environmentalist movement. DeGregori sees this movement as a kind of ideological cult of purity, as well as a dangerous political movement with hints of racism and exclusivism at its ideological core. In his 2002 book The Environment, Our Natural Resources, and Modern Technology, DeGregori argues that supposedly positive assertions such as "buy organic" are quite questionable and have had dangerous worldwide implications. He opens the first chapter by stating that such consumerism is still consumerism, creating the perception that if one simply "buys right," one can change the world (DeGregori, 2002, pp. 9–18). These assertions are not only foolish, he contends, but they create victims of middle-class moral dietary fads and "junk science."
What is so harmful about such ideas, and why is DeGregori so exercised about their far-reaching implications? The American environmentalist or worldwide green movement may seem harmless on its surface. DeGregori's initial point can seem well-taken — even humorous — when portraying individuals who believe they are helping the world by purchasing a more expensive and dubiously labeled tomato, or by placing a glass bottle in the correct recycling receptacle. But what makes this behavior more than an object of satire? What makes the belief that buying organic produce changes or helps the world genuinely dangerous? (DeGregori, 2003, p. 10)
Works Cited
DeGregori, Thomas R. (2002). The Environment, Natural Resources and Modern Technology. Ames: Iowa State Press.
DeGregori, Thomas R. (2003). Origins of the Organic Agriculture Debate. Ames: Iowa State Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.