This paper argues that grades serve as an effective motivational and assessment tool in educational settings. Drawing on insights from educators such as Walvoord and Anderson and Guskey and Bailey, the paper contends that assignment-specific grading encourages active student engagement, helps learners identify areas for improvement, and provides tangible feedback on academic progress. The paper also addresses counterarguments regarding grading objectivity while maintaining that well-designed grading criteria can be fair and constructive. Finally, it examines how grades support higher-level academic motivation, career planning, and peer competition among older students.
This paper introduces and analyzes the topic of education and learning, arguing specifically that grades do encourage learning in educational settings. Grades give students something to aim for while simultaneously assessing their progress in the classroom. Teachers note that grades should be used as a tool to encourage learning, rather than simply assigning a letter or number to a student's work without care or forethought. Two educators, Barbara E. Walvoord and Virginia Johnson Anderson, believe grades should be assignment-specific rather than uniform across every task and class. They argue that this approach encourages learning by making the learning model different for each assignment, which motivates students to become more actively involved in their work (Walvoord and Anderson).
Many people believe that grading is not an essential part of learning, but grades motivate most students and encourage them to learn more in order to earn a better grade. In addition, grades help encourage learning by continually assessing student performance on specific tasks or problems, allowing students to identify what they understand and what they still need to work on. This awareness encourages them to work harder on more difficult material, which promotes both learning and mastery simultaneously.
Two educators note that "[m]ost students need to be shown the explicit benefits of putting forth appropriate effort on formative assessment devices" (Guskey and Bailey 31). In other words, students need to understand the benefit of their effort, and grades provide a tangible, visible result. Once students grasp how formative assessment tools such as grades can help them understand their own learning, they tend to become more enthusiastic about both assessments and learning in general.
"Addressing concerns about bias in teacher grading"
"Grades drive competition, career planning, and future success"
In conclusion, grades encourage learning for a number of reasons. They motivate students to do better and learn more in order to earn a higher grade, and they challenge high-achieving students to continue developing new skills and techniques. Grades motivate and stimulate students broadly, and teachers should employ creative grading strategies in the classroom so that grades remain meaningful and engaging rather than routine and discouraging. When used thoughtfully, grading practices can promote ongoing learning and sustained classroom growth.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.