Graphic Design: History, Theory, and Liberal Arts Education
This paper examines the breadth of knowledge required by graphic designers, drawing on scholarship by Gunnar Swanson, Jan Tschichold, and others. It investigates the argument that graphic design functions as a liberal art, touching on sociology, rhetoric, anthropology, and political science. The paper explores the current absence of a clearly defined scholarly framework for design, traces the historical evolution of visual communication symbols, and argues that history and theory must be integrated into design education. It concludes that an interdisciplinary approach — combining design practice with social sciences and liberal arts — provides the most effective foundation for graphic design study and professional practice.
- Introduction: Paper's purpose and scope introduced
- Graphic Design as a Liberal Art: Design as intersection of multiple academic disciplines
- Design Scholarship: Challenges of defining design's scholarly subject matter
- History and Theory in the Classroom and Studio: Why historical context strengthens design practice
- Historical Symbols in Graphic Design: Taxonomy of visual symbols from pictograms to crests
- Rhetoric, Social Science, and Interdisciplinary Integration: Rhetoric and social science in design curriculum
- Summary and Conclusion: Interdisciplinary approach essential for design education
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in direct quotations from recognized design scholars, lending authority to each claim about design education and practice.
- The inclusion of a historical taxonomy of graphic symbols (pictograms, logotypes, monograms, etc.) connects abstract theory to concrete, familiar examples.
- The paper consistently ties theoretical discussion back to a practical question: what knowledge does a working graphic designer actually need?
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesized secondary sources to build a cumulative argument. Rather than relying on a single authority, it draws on Swanson, Tschichold, Buchanan, Salmon, and Gritzer to show convergence around the idea that design education must be interdisciplinary. This multi-source corroboration strengthens the central thesis without requiring original empirical research.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statement of purpose, then moves through four substantive sections: the liberal arts framing of design, the problem of design scholarship, the role of history and theory in the studio, and the case for social science integration. A historical symbol list provides a concrete interlude before the rhetorical and interdisciplinary arguments close the body. A brief conclusion synthesizes the main findings. The structure is linear and thesis-driven, appropriate for an undergraduate survey paper.
Introduction
The objective of this paper is to examine the knowledge needed by the graphic designer, both historically and in today's modern world. As Swanson (2010) writes in "Graphic Design Education as a Liberal Art: Design and Knowledge in the University and the 'Real World'": "Though hardly homogeneous, the vast majority of graphic design programs, whether in vocational schools, art schools, or universities, are, at least in concept, vocational training programs" (p. 3).
Graphic Design as a Liberal Art
Swanson examines what graphic design would entail as a liberal art and argues that it would take various forms. Swanson states specifically that design should be:
"…about the relationship of form and communication. It is one of the fields where science and literature meet. It can shine a light on hidden corners of sociology and history. Design's position as conduit for and shaper of popular values can be a path between anthropology and political science. Art and education can both benefit through the perspective of a field that is about expression and the mass dissemination of information. Designers, design educators, and design students are in a more important and interesting field than we seem to recognize." (Swanson, 2010, p. 5)
References
Salmon, M., & Gritzer, G. (1992). Parallel content: Social sciences and the design curriculum. Design Issues, Fall 1992.
Swanson, G. (2010). Graphic design education as a liberal art: Design and knowledge in the university and the "real world." Retrieved from http://www.gunnarswanson.com/writing/GDasLiberalArt.pdf
Symbols: The alphabet of human thought. History of Graphic Design. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://designhistory.org/symbols.html
Tschichold, J. (n.d.). Good designers learn from history. Retin Art. Retrieved from http://retinart.net/graphic-design/good-designers-learn-from-history/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.