Human Capital Development in the US, Turkey, and China

Introduction

Within the contemporary business community, employees occupy an increasingly favorable position. Protected by laws and legislation, trained and motivated, the worker in modern society is more developed than ever before — or at least this is what the textbooks suggest. To assess the reality, it is important to examine the status of human capital development in three distinct national contexts: the United States of America, Turkey, and China.

Human Capital Development in the United States

Within the United States, employees are generally well treated and rewarded. They are continually presented with opportunities for personal and professional development, and American corporations have become a symbol of the broader national culture. This can be observed clearly in companies that have expanded beyond the US, such as fast food giant McDonald's. At McDonald's, for instance, employees span all ages and come from a wide range of cultural, political, and religious backgrounds. American employers place great emphasis on diversity, the inclusion of diverse individuals, and the elimination of discrimination.

American employers also broadly operate with the understanding that the employee is the organization's most valuable asset (Hickman, 2005). They therefore offer a wide array of development opportunities, including performance premiums and bonuses, training and professional development programs, educational support, adoption assistance, inclusion of sexually diverse employees, internal promotion pathways, and other incentives. In this context, the levels of employee development in the United States are very high.

Human Capital Development in Turkey

In Turkey, however, the situation is markedly different. Despite being an internationally popular tourist destination and an exotic, appealing country, modern Turkey is caught between the demands of the new era and its deep-rooted traditions, values, and culture. Women in Turkey, for instance, are torn between their historically subordinate role in the home and the emerging opportunities to work outside the home and build a career. While Turkish legislation formally establishes gender equality, women continue to face discrimination in the workplace, at home, and in public life. They remain poorly represented in both the labor force and in decision-making systems (United Nations Development Programme). Male workers, by contrast, benefit from comparatively stronger development opportunities, resulting in overall medium levels of human capital development across the country.

Conclusion

Overall, the level of human capital development in each country differs, and the differences could be attributed to the levels of economic development, international relations, and access to financial resources. But these differences are also tied to several social factors, the most significant of which is the degree of cultural development. In countries where human rights are more fully applied and where respect for individuals is higher, employee development tends to be stronger. In countries where discrimination remains pervasive and where the prevailing culture is one of exploitation, levels of human capital development are significantly lower.