Identifying Practice Gaps for Healthcare Quality Improvement
This paper examines the role of practice gap identification in healthcare quality improvement, with particular attention to cardiovascular disease risk management as a potential DNP project focus. Drawing on Kitson and Straus's knowledge-to-action framework and Heeley et al.'s AusHEART Study, the paper discusses how needs assessments determine the nature and size of performance gaps between current and desired practice. It also evaluates practical tools — including chart audits and decision support systems — that general practitioners can use to close identified gaps and improve patient outcomes in cardiovascular disease prevention and management.
- Introduction to Practice Gap Identification: Framework for identifying and analyzing healthcare practice gaps
- Cardiovascular Disease Risk as a Quality Improvement Gap: Cardiovascular risk assessment gaps in general practice
- Tools and Methods for Closing the Practice Gap: Chart audits and decision support tools as solutions
- References: Cited sources supporting the discussion
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from a broad conceptual framework (gap analysis and needs assessment) to a specific clinical application (cardiovascular disease risk management), giving the argument concrete grounding.
- It integrates peer-reviewed sources consistently, using Kitson and Straus's knowledge-to-action cycle as a theoretical backbone while applying Heeley et al.'s empirical findings as a real-world example.
- The final section translates the identified gap into actionable solutions — chart audits and decision support tools — demonstrating applied critical thinking appropriate to a DNP-level discussion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based argumentation: each claim is supported by a specific citation, and the student moves from identifying a problem (barriers to cardiovascular risk assessment) to proposing evidence-backed interventions. This technique — problem identification followed by solution synthesis — is central to professional doctoral writing in healthcare.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into three substantive paragraphs functioning as implicit sections. The first establishes the conceptual framework for practice gap identification. The second narrows focus to cardiovascular disease risk as a specific gap, citing the AusHEART Study. The third surveys tools available to address that gap. A formal reference list closes the paper. The structure reflects a concise discussion-post format suited to graduate nursing and healthcare management coursework.
Introduction to Practice Gap Identification
Identification of practice gaps in healthcare organizations is essential for quality improvement. Identifying gaps helps in assessing and examining an organization's performance in order to determine differences between what should be happening and what is actually happening in practice. From the gap analysis, healthcare organizations are then able to develop actions or projects that can be implemented to close those gaps and improve quality of care. Essentially, identifying gaps initiates the implementation of knowledge in practice (Kitson & Straus, 2010).
There are various approaches that can be used to identify quality improvement practice gaps. For instance, there may be a need to carry out a gap analysis at the hospital level. According to Kitson and Straus (2010), a needs assessment determines the nature and size of the gap in practice, as well as the desired behaviors, outcomes, attitudes, skills, and knowledge. The authors further suggest that the strategy used for the needs assessment depends upon the resources available, the type of data, and the purpose of the assessment. For instance, to identify information gaps relating to the use of restraints, mortality, and infection control, one would draw on data collected with regard to those cases, as required by bodies such as the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations.
Cardiovascular Disease Risk as a Quality Improvement Gap
A potential quality improvement practice gap relevant to a DNP project relates to the management of cardiovascular disease risk. According to Heeley et al. (2010), cardiovascular disease is a major cause of disability and death worldwide. A research study conducted in 2005 in Australia found that cardiovascular disease was accountable for approximately 1.4 million disabilities and 35% of deaths. In addition, eighty-five percent of Australians visit general practitioners to seek care for the disease. At present, there appears to be limited knowledge on how existing evidence can be deployed to improve outcomes in clinical settings.
One significant problem is the failure of general practitioners to perform cardiovascular disease risk assessments. Heeley et al. (2010) suggest that general practitioners fail to perform these assessments owing to a lack of incorporation of risk tools into practice software, poor understanding of how those tools are used, and a lack of understanding of the difference between relative and absolute risk. If these barriers are addressed, significant improvements in prevention and management could be achieved.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.