This paper examines the distinctive economic behavior of firms operating in oligopoly markets, where a small number of sellers must anticipate and respond to rivals' strategic moves. It explores the strong incentives for collusion that oligopolies create, contrasting these with conditions in perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic competition. The paper also analyzes how barriers to entry and the inability to gain lasting advantage through price competition push oligopolistic firms toward innovation as the primary path to long-run economic profit. The argument concludes that protected oligopolies offer the strongest structural incentive for sustained technological and product innovation.
Oligopoly firms operate in a market characterized by a few sellers, often only two or three. This characteristic breeds unique behavior in these firms. Firms in an oligopoly typically operate in relation to each other's moves. This means that a price increase by one firm will result either in that firm losing market share or the other firm matching the price increase. Firms in oligopolies typically do not know what the other firms are going to do strategically, and therefore make their own decisions based on the expected moves of their rivals.
For firms in an oligopoly, there are strong incentives to collude (Investopedia, 2011). Collusion would allow the firms to restrict output and then set prices so that each firm can earn economic profit. Acting individually, oligopoly firms have an incentive to lower prices, as this will not only win customers from the other firm in the oligopoly but also attract new customers who otherwise would not participate in the market. The chart below illustrates how collusion in an oligopoly allows firms to earn economic profit while equilibrium conditions do not (source: Investopedia).
These characteristics differ from other types of markets. In perfect competition, there is no profit, and therefore no incentive to invest in technology. In a monopoly, there is also no incentive to invest because there is no competition. In monopolistic competition, there is an incentive to innovate because there is opportunity for short-run profit; however, in the long run there is no economic profit. It is only the lure of short-run profit that encourages innovation in that market type.
"How entry barriers shape long-run innovation strategy"
"Innovation as the key path to sustained profit"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.