This paper presents a real-world case study of inter-group conflict at a large community center, where an unexpected facility maintenance issue forced two departments—adult men's basketball and early childhood programming—to compete for the same limited space. Tracing the conflict from its origins through a series of proposed and rejected solutions, the paper examines how an assistant executive director navigated competing interests and arrived at a practical compromise. The case illustrates key principles of conflict resolution, including active listening, resource-based negotiation, and the importance of maintaining relationships between departments over the long term.
The organization in which this conflict took place is a large community center that maintains many programs, including a sports, health, and recreation department, senior services, childcare services, and early childhood education programs. Generally, careful planning and resource allocation enables program administrators to make the most efficient use possible of shared facilities, balancing the needs of various departments and programs that sometimes conflict. Usually, for example, the early childhood exercise component of the early childhood education program utilizes the aerobics and dance studio on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons because the gymnasium is reserved for adult basketball league practice.
On this particular occasion, repairs to the air conditioning system precluded the aerobics and dance studio's use for any programs. The early childhood director therefore asked for permission to use half of the basketball court for its program activities. The men's sports director objected adamantly and argued that the adult basketball league could not hold a meaningful practice on only one half of the basketball court. The children's programming director countered that it was not much to ask that the men's basketball league confine its practice to half the court for a single day. It was a classic example of inter-group conflict.
It became clear almost immediately to the assistant executive director in charge of programming operations that neither group could be fully accommodated and that one or the other would have to sacrifice something.
"Yoga studio and outdoor options rejected for safety and logistics"
"Director brokers court-sharing compromise with positive aftermath"
You’re 31% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.