Ethical Interpersonal Communication in Political Negotiations
This paper analyzes the breakdown in communication between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker of the House John Boehner during negotiations over the Bush-era tax cuts. Drawing on Johnson's (2012) framework of ethical interpersonal communication, the paper identifies their exchanges as examples of monologue communication and an I-It relationship characterized by self-centeredness and a lack of genuine engagement. The paper recommends a shift toward an I-Thou relationship by developing specific communication competencies, including mindfulness, the HURIER model of effective listening, and emotional intelligence. Together, these strategies are presented as a pathway to productive, respectful dialogue capable of resolving critical policy disagreements.
- Introduction and Scenario Overview: Reid-Boehner tax cut conflict introduced
- Communication Failures: Monologue and the I-It Relationship: Self-centered monologue and I-It behavior diagnosed
- Recommendations for I-Thou Communication: Shift to dialogue and I-Thou relationship proposed
- Mindfulness and Effective Listening Strategies: HURIER model and mindfulness competencies explained
- Emotional Intelligence in Political Dialogue: Emotion recognition and mood management strategies
- Conclusion: I-Thou dialogue recommended for productive policy resolution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its recommendations in a clearly identified theoretical framework — Johnson's (2012) distinction between I-It and I-Thou relationships — and applies it consistently to a real-world political scenario.
- Uses a vivid, documented exchange between Reid and Boehner as concrete evidence of communication breakdown, making the abstract concept of monologue communication immediately tangible.
- Organizes recommendations into discrete, named competencies (mindfulness, the HURIER model, emotional intelligence), giving the paper a practical, actionable structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis: it moves from theoretical definition (I-It vs. I-Thou, monologue vs. dialogue) to empirical observation (the documented confrontation) to prescriptive recommendation. This theory-to-practice structure is a hallmark of applied ethics writing and shows how abstract communication frameworks can be used to diagnose and address real interpersonal failures.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a scenario description that establishes the conflict, then transitions into a diagnosis of the communication problem using established theory. The recommendations section forms the bulk of the paper, subdivided by competency (mindfulness, listening, emotional intelligence). A brief conclusion synthesizes the argument and reaffirms the policy stakes. The structure is linear and functional, moving clearly from problem identification to solution.
Introduction and Scenario Overview
This paper focuses on the disagreement over the Bush-era tax cuts between Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, and John Boehner, the Speaker of the House. The two leaders took opposing positions: Senator Reid believed the tax cuts policy should focus on people earning less than $250,000 per year, while Speaker Boehner believed tax cuts should apply to everyone, including the wealthiest Americans. Both leaders had a history of difficulty reaching consensus and engaging in effective communication. Despite their differences, both parties recognized that allowing the tax cuts policy to expire would have a significant detrimental effect on the nation's economic recovery.
The objective of this paper is to guide both Reid and Boehner toward productive communication and behaviors that will foster an I-Thou relationship — one that will allow them to work together to resolve the tax cuts dispute amicably and address other critical issues facing the nation.
Communication Failures: Monologue and the I-It Relationship
A review of the case reveals that neither Boehner nor Reid engaged in ethical communication. Their communication was not grounded in genuine dialogue, which is the foundation of effective interpersonal exchange. Johnson (2012) argues that a communicator should integrate ethical communication into his or her approach, and that the outcome of any communication depends on the attitude each individual holds toward the other party. The communication relationship between Reid and Boehner is an example of what Johnson (2012) describes as monologue communication and an I-It relationship.
Spaeth (2013) documented a particularly striking exchange between the two leaders during fiscal cliff negotiations:
"Go f— yourself," Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present. Reid, a bit startled, replied: "What are you talking about?" Boehner repeated: "Go f— yourself." (Spaeth, 2013, p. 1).
This type of exchange is a clear example of an I-It relationship. A communicator operating within an I-It framework is self-centered and not genuinely interested in the perspective of the other party. Similarly, a monologue communicator is self-centered, and monologue communication is characterized by manipulation, coercion, exploitation, and deception. The interaction between Reid and Boehner reflects precisely this kind of dysfunctional communication system.
Recommendations for I-Thou Communication
Identifying the shortcomings in the communication between Reid and Boehner leads to a clear recommendation: both parties should adopt the I-Thou relationship as a framework for approaching the tax cuts issue and other pressing national concerns. In practice, this means treating one another as unique human beings and genuinely seeking to understand the other's perspective. Rather than engaging in monologue communication, both Reid and Boehner should commit to dialogue — a mode of engagement that emphasizes understanding and mutual respect, and that is the defining feature of the I-Thou relationship.
To foster this relationship, both leaders must set aside existing misconceptions and personal hostilities. While the I-Thou framework is essential, both parties currently lack the skills needed to adopt it consistently. The following strategies are recommended to help them develop the necessary competencies:
The first strategy both Boehner and Reid should employ is a commitment to default dialogue — an approach in which both parties consistently act as good listeners and treat each other with respect. Each should take advantage of every opportunity for the other to open up a meaningful exchange.
Mindfulness and Effective Listening Strategies
Both Reid and Boehner should incorporate mindfulness into their communication. Mindfulness involves simultaneously devoting complete attention to one's own thinking and to the perspective of the opposing party. It is the practice of full, present-centered attention to the issue at hand. The benefits of mindfulness in communication are well established: parties who practice mindfulness are more likely to experience a positive mood during exchanges and less likely to suffer from anxiety or defensiveness. More importantly, mindful communication promotes stronger relationships by helping each partner welcome new information from the other while remaining aware of their own behavior during the conversation. A mindful approach also creates space for differing points of view to be heard and considered.
Johnson (2012) argues that listening is a key aspect of dialogue. Both Reid and Boehner should work to understand each other's perspectives in order to arrive at shared solutions. One useful framework for this is the HURIER model, which consists of the following components:
By integrating the HURIER model into their interactions, both leaders can develop more effective listening skills. For example, each should exercise patience when the other is presenting an argument, taking note of key points for further consideration. This practice supports remembering, interpreting, and evaluating the information received, ultimately enabling each party to formulate a more informed and persuasive response.
Conclusion
This paper has examined the disagreement between two prominent political leaders, Reid and Boehner, over the Bush-era tax cuts. An analysis of their interactions reveals a consistent reliance on monologue communication and an I-It relational stance, characterized by self-centeredness and an unwillingness to engage genuinely with the other's perspective. This paper recommends that both parties adopt the I-Thou relationship as their guiding communication framework, supplemented by specific competencies including mindfulness, effective listening through the HURIER model, emotional intelligence, trust building, and moral argument. Developing these skills will not only allow Reid and Boehner to resolve the tax cuts dispute productively, but will also strengthen their capacity to collaborate on other critical issues affecting the nation's economic well-being.
References
Johnson, C. E. (2012). Organizational ethics: A practical approach (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Spaeth, R. (2013). Fiscal-cliff drama: John Boehner reportedly told Harry Reid to go f— himself. The Week, January 2, 2013.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.