International Paper Annual Report Communication Analysis
This paper evaluates International Paper's 2003 annual company report against twelve principles of effective managerial communication drawn from Smeltzer, Leonard, and Hynes's textbook. The analysis examines how the report handles word precision, length, concreteness, economy, avoidance of clichés and jargon, courtesy, conversational tone, sentence length, active versus passive voice, paragraph development, coherence, and editing. The paper identifies both strengths — such as well-structured paragraphs and a generally active voice — and weaknesses, including excessive abstraction, negative framing of financial results, and unnecessarily long sentences, offering specific textual examples throughout.
- Introduction and Scope: Overview of report and analytical framework used
- Word Choice: Precision, Length, and Concreteness: Evaluating denotation, word length, and abstraction
- Economy of Language and Avoidance of Clichés: Wordiness, jargon, and glossary use assessed
- Tone, Courtesy, and Conversational Style: Negative framing, gender language, and formality
- Sentence Length and Voice: Long sentences and active vs. passive voice
- Paragraph Structure, Coherence, and Editing: Structure, coherence, and editorial quality reviewed
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each analytical point is directly supported by a quoted passage from the source document, giving the critique concrete grounding rather than relying on vague assertions.
- The paper consistently pairs a criticism with a suggested improvement, demonstrating applied rather than purely evaluative thinking.
- The structured, checklist-style format makes the argument easy to follow and shows methodical application of a communication framework to a real-world text.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates textual analysis applied to professional documents: the student selects specific excerpts from the annual report, evaluates them against named communication principles, and proposes rewritten alternatives. This technique — quote, evaluate, revise — is a core skill in business communication courses and shows the ability to translate theoretical criteria into practical editorial judgment.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a numbered framework corresponding to twelve communication principles from the course textbook. Each section opens with a general observation about the report, provides at least one direct quotation as evidence, delivers a verdict, and often suggests a rewritten version. The conclusion to each point is brief, keeping the overall piece concise. The bibliography cites the single textbook source used as the evaluative framework.
Introduction and Scope
This analysis evaluates International Paper's 2003 annual company report against twelve principles of effective managerial communication, as outlined in Managerial Communication: Strategies and Application (Smeltzer, Leonard, & Hynes, 2002). Each principle is examined in turn, with direct quotations from the report used as evidence and, where appropriate, suggested revisions offered. The goal is to assess how well the report communicates financial and operational information to its intended audience of investors and other interested parties.
Bibliography
Smeltzer, L., Leonard, D., & Hynes, G. (2002). Managerial Communication: Strategies and Application (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.