This paper investigates whether attendance at a company outing — Camp Feel Good — is associated with improved employee job satisfaction scores. Using descriptive statistics and a two-sample t-test applied to SPSS output data, the study identifies the independent variable (meeting attendance) and dependent variable (job satisfaction score), reports key measures of central tendency, and evaluates a directional hypothesis. The analysis finds that attendees scored approximately 15% higher on job satisfaction and that the null hypothesis is accepted, supporting the conclusion that camp attendance had a positive effect on employee attitudes toward their jobs.
This research was conducted to identify any relationship between job satisfaction and employee attendance at a recent company outing to Camp Feel Good. Essentially, the manager designed this experiment to determine how effective attendance at Camp Feel Good is in influencing employee attitudes toward their jobs.
The study defines the following notation for hypothesis testing:
μ₁ = mean job satisfaction score of employees who attended the outing and did not experience an increase in job satisfaction
μ₀ = mean job satisfaction score of employees who attended the outing and did experience an increase in job satisfaction
Alternative hypothesis (H₁): μ₁ > μ₀
Null hypothesis (H₀): μ₁ = μ₀
Two variables were examined in this analysis:
Meeting Attendance: This variable is discrete, as it can only take the values "yes" or "no" with no values in between. It is a quantitative measurement and serves as the independent variable in this study.
Job Satisfaction Score: This variable is continuous and nominal. It is a qualitative variable that must be interpreted in context to understand its meaning. It serves as the dependent variable in this analysis.
The descriptive statistics reveal several important points relevant to the research question. The mean job satisfaction score for the entire group was 34.15 out of 50. The standard deviation was 7.516, which is relatively high and represents a potential limitation of this analysis. The median score of 34 is close to the mean, which helps support the mean's relevance to the analysis.
Breaking down the numbers further, job satisfaction scores and camp attendance do appear to have a statistical relationship. This is suggested by the mean scores differing by nearly 15%, with employees who attended the outing being more likely to report higher job satisfaction than those who did not.
The manager used a two-sample t-test to further examine the relationship between the two variables. This test helped to rule out the possibility that the relationship identified through descriptive analysis was due to chance alone. The means for each group were compared to calculate a p-value, which indicated that the null hypothesis is acceptable. It is therefore concluded that attending the Camp Feel Good outing had a positive effect on employee job satisfaction scores.
"T-test results support null hypothesis acceptance"
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.