This paper examines the distinction between job satisfaction and organizational commitment as drivers of employee motivation. Drawing on research by Tella, Ayeni, and Popoola (2007) and Moynihan, Boswell, and Boudreau (2000), the paper argues that job satisfaction is more strongly correlated with motivation than organizational commitment. It applies these findings to real workplace observations and discusses implications for performance management, incentive design, and the cultivation of employee engagement. The paper concludes that intrinsic motivation tied to meaningful work is more effective than loyalty-based motivational strategies, and that companies benefit more from stimulating job design than from appeals to organizational mission.
The paper demonstrates the technique of applied literature synthesis — using two distinct research studies not simply to summarize findings, but to build a layered argument. Tella et al. establishes the primacy of job satisfaction, while Moynihan et al. adds nuance by linking organizational commitment back to satisfaction, showing the author can handle complexity without undermining a core thesis.
The paper opens by defining the two key constructs, then presents empirical evidence, connects it to real organizational experience, and transitions into prescriptive recommendations for employers and performance managers. The conclusion reinforces the thesis by tying intrinsic motivation to job quality rather than company loyalty. The structure follows a classic claim → evidence → application → recommendation pattern, making it easy to follow and argue from.
There is a distinct difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Job satisfaction relates specifically to the job itself. While it is influenced by organizational factors, a job can be satisfactory even when there is little commitment to the organization. Either one can serve as a source of motivation, but it is important for management to know which dynamic is at play and which one might be more valuable as a motivating force.
Tella, Ayeni, and Popoola (2007) studied this issue and found that motivation was correlated with both job satisfaction and organizational commitment, but that the correlation with job satisfaction was strong and positive while the correlation with organizational commitment was weak and negative. This means that the job itself is more important to motivation than the organization. Intuitively, this makes sense. Motivation is related to the job because that is what a person does on a daily basis. The organization might be a source of motivation, but if commitment to the organization results in a person doing a job he or she does not find fulfilling, the result will be a lower level of motivation. Because people are primarily concerned with their own daily experience, it is unsurprising that motivation is more highly correlated with the factor that most directly affects their working lives.
Moynihan, Boswell, and Boudreau (2000) also studied the link between organizational commitment and job satisfaction — a connection that ideally would have been included in the Tella study as well. They found that workers showed greater job satisfaction when they had higher organizational commitment. While this may not translate directly to greater motivation, it is worth considering that there are strong links among all three factors, and that job satisfaction plays a central role in both organizational commitment and motivation.
From workplace experience, it is clear that these findings hold. There is a much higher level of commitment to the job than there is to the company. This reflects a tendency for companies to show low loyalty to their workers, with workers responding in kind. When employees are employed at will, it is primarily the job and compensation that keep them in place. Motivation derives far more from the nature of the work than from compensation alone. Workers who feel stuck in a poor job — even if they otherwise appreciate the company — are more likely to leave and are less motivated by their contribution to the company's overall success.
In part, this has important lessons for organizational behavior. Employees with a high level of organizational commitment should, in theory, be motivated by that commitment. In practice, however, many do not appear to feel genuinely engaged with the company's overall success. Insufficient linkages between individual performance and bonuses further reduce motivation to perform at higher levels.
For managers, finding ways to make jobs more stimulating might coax greater levels of motivation from workers. Most employees are content with their jobs but are not necessarily driven to work harder unless there is a threat of losing those jobs. In an ideal situation, the intrinsic motivation that employees feel in a fulfilling role would be sufficient. In reality, however, many companies simply do not have enough genuinely engaging jobs to go around. These companies attempt to substitute loyalty to the company as a motivating factor, only to encounter the reality that this is not an effective substitute.
Such companies therefore experience lower overall motivation and struggle to attract and retain their best people as a result. Both personal workplace experience and the academic literature support the same conclusion: the job is more important to motivation than the organization, and performance incentives linked directly to the job are likewise more powerful because employees respond more readily to clear connections between their individual performance and their rewards.
Moynihan, L., Boswell, W. & Boudreau, J. (2000). The influence of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on executive withdrawal and performance. CAHRS Working Paper Series #00-16, Cornell University.
Tella, A., Ayeni, C. & Popoola, S. (2007). Work motivation, job satisfaction and organisational commitment of library personnel in academic and research libraries in Oyo state, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practices. Retrieved November 9, 2013 from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.