Judy Brady's "I Want a Wife": Argument, Language & Audience
This paper analyzes Judy Brady's landmark feminist essay "I Want a Wife," addressing three key dimensions: the effectiveness of Brady's arguments (distinguishing emotional appeals from practical ones), her use of figurative language, and the audience she was writing for. The paper evaluates which of Brady's arguments are most and least persuasive, considers how language choices shape her tone, and reflects on why the essay resonated with women readers in its original context and continues to hold relevance today despite decades of social change.
- Brady's Arguments: Heart vs. Self-Interest: Evaluating emotional and personal appeals in Brady's argument
- Effectiveness of Brady's Practical Claims: Assessing factual claims about childcare and household labor
- Figurative Language and Its Impact: How Brady's word choices shape tone and credibility
- Audience, Purpose, and Lasting Relevance: Brady's intended readers and the essay's continuing resonance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves systematically through three distinct analytical questions, giving each its own focused treatment rather than blending them into one undifferentiated discussion.
- The writer balances genuine appreciation for Brady's stronger arguments with honest critique of weaker ones, demonstrating critical thinking rather than uncritical agreement.
- Specific quotations from the source text are used throughout to anchor claims, grounding the analysis in the actual language of the essay.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models multi-criteria rhetorical evaluation: rather than judging Brady's essay as simply effective or ineffective, it distinguishes between different types of appeals — emotional arguments rooted in family values, practical factual claims about childcare and household labor, and moments where the argument weakens into apparent self-pity. This nuanced approach shows that good literary analysis requires graduated judgment, not binary verdicts.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized around three explicit questions. The first section (Questions One) is the longest, analyzing emotional sincerity, domestic values, practical arguments, and rhetorical weak points. The second section (Question Two) examines figurative language and evaluates its contribution to Brady's overall argument. The third section (Question Three) situates the essay in its historical publication context and explains its continuing relevance to contemporary readers. Together the sections form a compact but complete rhetorical analysis.
Brady's Arguments: Heart vs. Self-Interest
While many of the arguments Brady makes are based on her personal and professional needs, a few of the arguments she makes in her desire to have a wife seem to come from the heart. She wants a wife who will "sympathize with my pain" — that seems genuine — and she also wants a wife to help pay for her schooling so she can not only become independent but also "support those dependent upon me." This shows she is not simply thinking about herself in a selfish sense.
The desire Brady has to help her children in several ways reveals her character and her values. She wants them to eat properly; she wants them to have "an adequate social life with their peers"; she feels it is important that her children go to the zoo and to the park. Because she will be going to school, she recognizes she will not have time to do the things for her children that she knows need to be done. Brady's values include keeping a clean house and ensuring her children are well fed and entertained. Education is also important to her, and she mentions its significance in a number of instances throughout the essay.
Brady's argument is most effective when she talks about her children's needs. She seems less effective when she talks about her own needs. For example, wanting "a wife who will pick up after me" comes across as rather selfish. Any grown person — working or not, going to school or not, with several children or none — should be able to pick up after herself. Similarly, when Brady says she needs a wife to "see to it that my personal things are kept in their proper place" so she can find them when needed, the argument weakens because it sounds like she is complaining about an inability to keep her own belongings organized.
Effectiveness of Brady's Practical Claims
The factual elements of Brady's argument include practical, concrete demands: she needs a wife to keep track of doctors' appointments and to be willing to give up certain work hours when the children's needs outweigh her wife's schedule. She needs a wife to pay for childcare during school breaks when her wife is at work. She needs a wife to plan menus and do the grocery shopping; she needs meals cooked and her children served "pleasantly." Someone has to clean up after the meal is served, and Brady cannot do that because she needs that time for studying.
These practical claims carry genuine rhetorical weight because they reflect the real, documented burden of domestic labor that falls disproportionately on women. When Brady grounds her argument in these concrete responsibilities, readers — particularly women readers — recognize the daily reality she is describing, which makes her case more persuasive.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.