This essay examines the origins and development of human rights, arguing that no single cause accounts for their emergence. Beginning with the Protestant Reformation's challenge to Church authority, the paper traces how governmental tyranny, colonial exploitation, and social oppression each contributed to successive waves of rights consciousness. Drawing on the American and French Revolutions, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, the essay demonstrates that the desire for human rights is a fundamental human condition — one that repeatedly reasserts itself when people face unchecked power and injustice.
The paper demonstrates multicausal historical analysis — the practice of identifying several distinct contributing factors to a phenomenon rather than accepting a single-cause explanation. By systematically introducing and connecting each cause (Reformation, governmental abuse, oppression), the writer builds a cumulative argument that is more persuasive than any single-factor explanation would be.
The essay opens with the Protestant Reformation as a potential origin point, then expands outward through the American and French Revolutions, the post-WWII Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the U.S. Civil Rights Movement. Each historical case reinforces the central claim. The conclusion loops back to the opening proposition and offers a balanced synthesis, giving the paper a clear arc from hypothesis to evidence to reasoned conclusion.
The sudden "flowering" of respect for rights could relate to the Protestant Reformation, which certainly changed the religious world and questioned the relationship between the state and the individual. The Reformation reduced the power of the Catholic Church and showed people they could be responsible for their own lives — an idea that directly fed into emerging concepts of human rights and justice. People discovered they could happily exist without the all-encompassing rule of the Catholic Church, and it set them free to develop other ideas, models, and theories of justice and rights. The Reformation truly changed the world, adding new options for belief and spirituality, and that transformation led to broader philosophical questions about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
However, the sudden desire for human rights, and the continuation of those rights throughout modern history, cannot possibly be attributed to only one cause. The desire for human rights seems like a very basic human need, and the flowering of rights consciousness in the 17th and 18th centuries was also a result of powerful governments and the abuse of their powers. This is clearly represented in the case of the United States, which began its Revolution as a reaction to British policies imposed on a distant colony. The government taxed the colonists without allowing them representation, controlled importing and exporting, and generally trampled on the people's rights.
Eventually, the colonists had enough and revolted. One of the primary concerns during the revolt was the protection of their rights, which were written into the founding documents of the new nation — including the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The same holds true for France, which had its own Revolution in the 1790s. This revolution arose from rule by a despot, and the people revolted against the power and corruption of the wealthy king and his upper class. Human rights and basic freedoms were at the roots of the revolt, and the French, too, gained these through revolution and uprising.
The sudden flowering of respect for rights could date back to the Reformation, but it also has roots in the continued tyranny of powerful governments and the people's eventual dissatisfaction with that tyranny. Too much power concentrated in the hands of too few will always result in revolt, and history has proven this repeatedly. The Reformation formed the foundation of change, and continued tyranny helped it grow and flower into a true and enduring demand for human rights.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.