Leadership Best Practices in Military and Corporate Settings
This paper examines leadership best practices across multiple contexts, including individual relationships, group dynamics, corporate environments, and military operations. Drawing on contingency theory, social and emotional intelligence, and resilience training, the paper argues that no single leadership style fits all situations. Instead, effective leaders must be adaptable, drawing from a broad toolkit of strategies to meet the needs of their followers and their environment. The paper discusses how sharing best practices equips leaders to motivate individuals, foster group cohesion, navigate corporate diversity, and achieve military objectives through empowerment and transparent communication.
- Introduction: Situational leadership drives military and organizational success
- Defining Leadership: Leadership as empowerment and avoiding micromanagement
- How Sharing Leadership Best Practices Can Help: Sharing practices expands leaders' adaptive toolkit
- Leading Individuals: Emotional intelligence and resilience motivate individual followers
- Leading Groups: Communication and accountability sustain effective group leadership
- Leadership in Corporations and Military Objectives: Vision, empowerment, and data inform corporate and military leadership
- Conclusion: Adaptable best practices enable leadership across all contexts
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically moves from a broad definition of leadership to increasingly specific contexts — individuals, groups, corporations, and military — giving the argument a clear and logical progression.
- It integrates peer-reviewed sources (Conger, Stogdill, Reivich et al., Schyns & Schilling) to ground each claim, avoiding unsupported generalization.
- It uses concrete examples, such as resilience training in the Army and multigenerational workforce challenges, to illustrate abstract principles and make them tangible.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied synthesis: rather than summarizing each source independently, it weaves multiple theoretical frameworks (contingency theory, empowerment theory, resilience training) into a unified argument about situational leadership adaptability. This technique shows how different scholarly perspectives reinforce a single central claim.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad framing of military leadership, defines leadership using Conger's empowerment model, and then develops its central thesis — that sharing best practices matters — across four distinct stakeholder contexts. Each section builds on the last, culminating in a conclusion that loops back to the thesis and synthesizes the practical takeaways.
Introduction
Military leadership depends upon the ability to motivate, support, and drive a team to accomplish the mission. Leadership styles are diverse in the military and can include everything from the autocratic style to the servant leadership style. The key to employing best practices in military leadership, however, is to understand the needs of the situation, the needs of the stakeholders, and the needs of the moment so that the right strategy is employed and the goal is achieved. For this reason, Stogdill asserts that contingency theory is the best way to explain how leaders should perform. This paper discusses leadership best practices, and particularly how sharing leadership best practices can help individuals, groups, corporations, and military units succeed.
Defining Leadership
Leadership has been defined as the ability to give empowerment to others (Conger). Leaders make a difference in the lives of others by helping them achieve their objectives — not by doing the work for them, but by giving them everything they require in order to succeed. This can include clear directions, a clear vision of what the mission is, a clear sense of what to do, or a clear path so that workers can exercise their skills and talents without constraint.
The leader can make many mistakes, such as falling into micromanaging — the problem of not giving workers enough space and freedom to do their jobs without feeling that their every move is being watched and monitored. This added stress reduces overall performance and productivity. The leader must be cognizant of how his or her tone, example, and behavior are received by workers and must act accordingly. A leader who is obtuse and disconnected from his or her workers sends a damaging message — namely, that he or she does not care about workers or what they are doing (Schyns, Schilling).
Works Cited
Conger, Jay A. "Leadership: The Art of Empowering Others." Academy of Management Executive 3.1 (1989): 17–25.
Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., and McBride, S. "Master Resilience Training in the US Army." American Psychologist 66.1 (2011): 25.
Schyns, B., and Schilling, J. "How Bad Are the Effects of Bad Leaders? A Meta-Analysis of Destructive Leadership and Its Outcomes." The Leadership Quarterly 24 (2013): 138–158.
Stogdill, R. M. "Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature." Journal of Psychology 25 (1948): 35–71.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.