This paper examines the nature of leadership by analyzing eight historical figures: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, Harriet Tubman, Andrew Young, Napoleon Bonaparte, Ross Perot, Pope John XXIII, and King David. Drawing on the "Great Man" theory and situational leadership scholarship, the paper argues that effective leadership combines innate personality traits with the demands of specific historical contexts. Each figure is considered individually to show how their principles, vision, and willingness to challenge the status quo produced lasting change in society and culture. The analysis bridges ancient history and the modern era, illustrating that certain leadership qualities are both timeless and context-dependent.
Having a leadership position and being a leader are not the same thing, even though many people believe they are. Being appointed to a leadership role is entirely dependent upon circumstances; being a leader is an innate quality that moves beyond the tactical and into the strategic, allows those with greatness to rise to the occasion, and often results in drastic changes in society and culture. We can ask, then, about the traits that make leaders successful.
There is scholarly evidence showing that certain personality traits are more developed in leaders than in non-leaders. When combined with particular historical circumstances, these traits become dominant, and the "Great Man" theory of leadership is fulfilled. This view holds that leaders are born, not made — that there is some genetic or innate configuration that allows certain individuals to exceed even their own greatest expectations. The theory was very popular in the 19th century, when scholars sought to understand how personalities shaped history.
In the 20th century, Thomas Carlyle used something called "social profiling" to identify the talents and skills he believed defined leadership, arguing that true leaders are larger than life and naturally extend their leadership traits to others (Carlyle and Tenneyson, 2000). This view may be somewhat simplistic in the modern world, however, because leaders often rise to the occasion in response to stressful situations: "In fact, leadership is highly situational and contextual. A special chemistry develops between leaders and followers and it is usually context specific" (Wren, 1995, p. 30).
When we look critically at eight individuals — Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, Harriet Tubman, Andrew Young, Napoleon Bonaparte, Ross Perot, Pope John XXIII, and King David — we might at first wonder what they have in common. After all, King David lived in the Middle East 1,000 years before Christ, while Andrew Young and Ross Perot, both born in the 1930s, are figures of the modern era. However, if we think of each as a leader who accomplished something extraordinary within their lifetime and left a clear mark on history, we see that each possessed the qualities of great leadership, was able to move millions of people, and held ideas and took actions that changed history forever.
Essentially, each of these individuals took a path that may not have been popular, but was necessary — one grounded in their own principles and aimed at inciting the change their time demanded. Looking at each individually:
King David — King David was a Hebrew king who ruled over the ancient Kingdom of Judah and Israel approximately 1,000 years before Christ. David is credited with forging a coherent Jewish kingdom, and the entire concept of modern Christianity is rooted in his lineage — as the founder of the core traditions of the Old Testament and as an ancestral link to the New Testament.
Napoleon Bonaparte — Napoleon challenged the status quo of Europe and brought France to the pinnacle of power in the early 1800s. He pushed exploration into Egypt, nearly conquered Russia, and upended the idea of European royalty as the sole governing force on the continent.
Harriet Tubman — Harriet Tubman was an African-American abolitionist and Union spy during the Civil War. She made many dangerous trips along the Underground Railroad and helped John Brown recruit fighters for his raid on Harpers Ferry. After the war, she continued her activism by struggling for women's rights. She pushed the bounds of society at a time when Black women were not recognized as leaders, and she inspired generations of African Americans.
"Shared qualities across all eight figures"
"How context shapes and activates leadership potential"
History shows that great leaders are neither purely born nor purely made. The evidence across these eight figures suggests that innate traits must meet the right historical moment to produce truly transformative leadership. King David, Napoleon, Harriet Tubman, and their counterparts each illustrate that personal qualities — courage, vision, conviction, and the ability to inspire — matter enormously, but that these qualities are activated and shaped by circumstance.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.